Category:Australian rules football trade unions[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: These "trade unions" aren't - they're representative bodies for participants in professional sport but they aren't (legally) trade unions. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Favor Rename What would be the right description, "professional associations"? RevelationDirect (talk) 02:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
REname somehow, rather than delete. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom. No category members so no need for a merge. VegaDark (talk) 09:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:South Texas Independent School District Libraries[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete per WP:SMALLCAT, only one article and little growth potential. No need to merge, the article is already in the parent category. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support With no objection to recreating if we ever get up to 5 or so articles. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- the one article is already in the parent. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
When foreign leaders visit South Africa, or vice versa, the Order of Good Hope is given out as souvenir to commemorate the visit. Recipients like Bill Clinton and Fidel Castro just don't seem to defined by this award. If you want to see the clutter this type of category creates at the article level, take a look the train wreck at the bottom of this article. If we delete this category, the recipients will still be listed here. - RevelationDirect (talk) 04:15, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
