The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Small one-county community with just 2 entries. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a very small locality with just 220 residents. Very limited possibility of expansion, does not aid in navigation and and makes sense to upmerge. AusLondonder (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support this is what the 'notable people' section on a city/geography article is for; and where the list is long, it is typically instantiated as a list rather than as a category. I'll add a 'notable people' section to the Garden, Michigan article momentarily. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:WikiProjects participating in Wikipedia 1.0 assessments[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:withdrawn. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category with just two entries. One of which is a cancelled project. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@WilliamJE: Are there any parent categories that that it should be merged to? Marcocapelle (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No but some of the categories this category are in, might have to be put back on the article page....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Ammazing World Records:Research Achievement[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Part of a user's self-serving set of categories, templates and drafts. Populated only by his draft article. Speedied multiple times under various names Has been been told more than once not to create new categories for his draft article, and not to use cats in draft articles. Meters (talk) 06:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it does appear to be self-serving with no apparent usefulness outside of their draft. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – not a viable category. Oculi (talk) 14:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Could an admin warn/block this editor? More categories have been created today for the sandbox article. Oculi (talk) 20:37, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- If spelt right, this would be a POV category. Clearly useless. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 1. Blank, and 2. Most likely a POV category. I would delete right now. —JJBers 15:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment After ANI discussion creator indeffed and all creations not already at XFD speedied. Meters (talk) 06:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Research Achievement,Ammazing World Records[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – not a viable category. Oculi (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if spelt correectly, this would be a POV category. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment After ANI discussion creator indeffed and all creations not already at XFD speedied. Meters (talk) 06:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Who is Who of Indian Writers(online)/search[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Part of a user's self-serving set of categories, templates and drafts. Populated only by his draft article. Speedied multiple times under this name and Category:Sahitya Akademi:Who is Who of Indian Writers. Has been been told more than once not to create new categories for his draft article, and not to use cats in draft articles. Meters (talk) 05:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – not a viable category. Oculi (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- now essentially an empty category. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment After ANI discussion creator indeffed and all creations not already at XFD speedied. Meters (talk) 06:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, only one or two articles per category. The nominated categories have all been created by the same editor User:Hocimi of whom some more Dutch history categories have been nominated in the past weeks. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:merge two categories with overlapping scope. This is another Hocimi creation. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge -- obviously the same thing. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support – consistent with naming convention for the subject matter. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. – FayenaticLondon 23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- This feels like a performance by performer category. I am surprised that participants are notable, unless for other reasons. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:27, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Classic example of a performer category. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lists of concert tours of South Korea[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: These are not lists of concert tours of South Korea, they are lists of concert tours by South Korean musicians that take place in South Korea, among other countries. Alternatively, this can be upmerged to its parent categories as too small. ℯxplicit 01:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As it is currently named, this is a horrible idea: imagine how many concert tours have gone thru America! Tours by artist nationality is probably trivial and wouldn't be used for navigation. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge or rename per nom. Deletion of the South Korean subcat on its own is not appropriate, it should only be considered for deletion if the parent Category:Lists of concert tours is discussed in conjunction. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
