The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete per WP:SMALLCAT and a category for such a small village as Kasina Wielka is too much detail (no need to merge, the one person in the category is already in the county parent category). Marcocapelle (talk) 16:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Category:People from Limanowa County Small community with not enough entries. Since the one person was in the County category, I removed it as overcategorized....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Either way, it has the same end result. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Ukrainian-speaking countries and territories[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete the first, no consensus on the second. – FayenaticLondon 22:18, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:delete, this is not a defining characteristic, e.g. Poland and Kazakhstan aren't primarily known as Ukrainian-speaking countries. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nonsense category.GreyShark (dibra) 15:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for Category:Ukrainian-speaking countries and territories, with the exception of Ukraine (surprise!) none of the other articles included are known for this. Not sure how I feel about the second category nominated though, my vote for now applies for the first one. Inter&anthro (talk) 14:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. – FayenaticLondon 21:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fell the whole tree (by upmerging to retailers) -- The whole bookstores tree contains 16 articles and does not need to be split by date. We should also delete 20th and 21st century and 2nd millennium parents. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge as nominated, fell the whole tree per nominator and Peterkingiron. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Indiscriminate category, not useful for it is a category of miscellaneous articles. There are no other categories beginning with "Things...". - CHAMPION(talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A category that violates every word of WP:OCAT. Unencyclopedic. AusLondonder (talk) 15:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As mentioned above unencylopedic and violates several category guidelines. Inter&anthro (talk) 18:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. – FayenaticLondon 21:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Inappropriate intersection of race, nationality and political opinions. TM 02:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Restructure to Category:White South African anti-apartheid activists, which is a notable intersection. How left wing they were on other political issues is not necessarily material. (Note we have often deleted "conservatives", "liberals", "progressives", etc, except where the criterion is membership of a political party). Peterkingiron (talk) 22:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Rename - per above, although I'm not sure if Peterkingiron's suggestion is the best possibility, the current category name is too vague. Inter&anthro (talk) 14:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
