The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Redundant to other categories (and only contains one thing) Amisom (talk) 14:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Category:Pakistani legume dishes. However, I doubt that Pakistani cuisine differs much from north Indian cuisine, so that I wonder if it should not all be merged to "South Asian". Peterkingiron (talk) 17:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. ℯxplicit 04:37, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If kept, I agree with the rename. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom, unless the category begins population immediately. Keira1996 21:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional concepts of the afterlife[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. ℯxplicit 04:37, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: the two categories mainly contain fictional works, there is no reason to keep them apart. The proposed new name is more in line with the overall tree of Category:Fiction by topic. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:32, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and suggested new title is better and succinct. Brandmeistertalk 14:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Same topic, no need for two categories. Dimadick (talk) 07:57, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge New title is more concise, self explanatory, and doesn't exclude any specifics to the two categories proposed to be merged. Keira1996 01:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Creator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. I do not understand the argument. There are dozens if not a hundred or more basketball teams in Helsinki. Potential for growth is clearly given. Stephreef (talk) 10:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Stephreef: There may indeed be dozens of basketball teams in Helsinki, but how many of them are WP:Notable? I very much doubt that there dozens of notable basketball teams in Helsinki which would meet the criteria of WP:Notability (organizations and companies).
I would have no objection to this categ being re-created in the future if and when there are enough articles to populate it. Categories exist to navigate between articles, and if the articles don't exist, we don't need the category. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 10:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I would guess that the creator is exaggerating numbers, but most will be NN amateur teams, which will (or should) never have an article. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
