The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge and delete as nominated. ℯxplicit 01:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Each category contains two or 3 articles and most are smaller communities with little room for growth. TM 21:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge for Now/Consolidate Nomination Merge per WP:SMALLCAT, small category with limited growth potential. @Namiba: It probably makes sense to do a group nomination for ease in participation in CFD.RevelationDirect (talk) 01:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
RevelationDirect I'm not entirely sure how to do that while merging. If you do, please help us all out and do so. Thanks--TM 01:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Namiba: I just rewrote your rationale and left your signature at the end so you probably want to make sure I didn't misrepresent your intent. (The nominations themselves are yours though.) When you do a group nomination like this, you would use {{subst:Cfd|GroupNominationSectionName}} so that your notices don't point to a non-existent section named after the specific category. (If you're going to go back and update the notices now that it's a different day, I would edit what's there and put the section name after the "1=" because the normal notice will automatically point to 9/30.) Feel free to use this as a template for future group noms and tag me on my talk page with any questions. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support in principle but am relying on the nom for local city / county structure. Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support in principle -- I also rely on nom as to whether all targets are right. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
None of the articles in this category are specifically about a rape, the articles are mostly about companions and siblings of Persephone. I would consider Persephone to be the main article and if this category renamed it could simply become Category:Persephone. However one may also well argue that the category should be deleted per WP:OCASSOC. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge/delete as nominated. -- Black Falcon(talk) 01:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, until 1900 there is far too little content per century to keep up a complicated decade and year tree. A double merge is not needed, all articles are already in a year category (in the Ottoman Empire tree). Marcocapelle (talk) 09:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I had to do some investigation into where there might be a valid (as opposed to an anachronistic) category. Albania has a separate history in the medieval period, 1271-1477, as a dependency of Angevin Naples, then as a dependency of Venice. From 1898, we may be getting the stirrings of a nationalist movement, leading up to the creation of a state in 1912, but there is not enough content to merit a tree on this scale. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 11#Category:Rape myths of Persephone. ℯxplicit 01:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
