Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 1[edit]

Category:Wikipedia editing aids[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: closed (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There is no need for examples of this user "Wikipedia" editing pages about serious medical conditions. --2804:D55:29A4:9400:44B9:F05C:5859:E612 (talk) 15:53, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Holocaust anti-Jewish pogroms[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 02:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge, the scope of this category is not clearly distinct from its parent category. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:22, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Holocaust antisemitic attacks and incidents[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 02:36, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge to parent Category:Holocaust massacres and pogroms. We don't have nor need a tree for 'attacks and incidents'. This category has no purpose, the parent is sufficient.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:51, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Wall, Pennsylvania[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 03:54, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Small one-county community with just 1 entry. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Category namespace[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: yawn. See WP:Rules_for_Fools#The_rules. No blocked for vandalism. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:58, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Not meta enough. wumbolo ^^^ 09:09, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose (as creator) – Matches categories (and redirects) for other namespaces. The category is a logical location for Wikipedia administration pages relating to the category namespace (though obviously it's a redirect to the actual location). The nominator didn't actually provide any real reason the redirect should be deleted. Since the page is for administration purposes, not readers, the fact that it's "meta" isn't an issue. M.Clay1 (talk) 10:35, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • April Fool? --K.e.coffman (talk) 18:54, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from South Derbyshire[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: to make consistent with other similar categories, e.g. Category:People from North East Derbyshire (district), Category:People from South Gloucestershire (district) (and many others) and to enable it to be used with Template:Cathead English people by place, note this would undo Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 June 20#Category:People from South Derbyshire (district), which used as its (to my thinking weaker) argument that the parent category and main article South Derbyshire were not disambiguated. GrahamHardy (talk) 07:04, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The casual reader will wrongly assume people so categorized come from the north east of Derbyshire and the southern part of Gloucestershire, surely we should clarify rather than obfuscate...GrahamHardy (talk) 13:17, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Specialist police agencies of India[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete per nom. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:23, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary distinction. Police agencies are law enforcement agencies. In line with other categories and the relevent articles. Rathfelder (talk) 10:35, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 06:02, 1 April 2018 (UTC) [reply]
  • 'Comment -- This is difficult to judge because some appear to have been emptied out of process. Where only one exists, we should keep that. In some countries there may be law enforcement agencies that are not technically police. In those cases we may keep "law enforcement agencies" and merge "police agencies", but all should come under a single parent, whose children may vary salightly in title according to local circumstances. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:19, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a very well established category tree based on Category:Law enforcement agencies. There isn't one based on police and there are few Police categories at all until you get down to categories based on individual local police forces like Category:Delhi Police. It is hard to see a distinction between a law enforcement agency and the police. Rathfelder (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/rename per nom. DexDor (talk) 12:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mount St. Mary's College[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted, see here (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 04:13, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: In 2015, this school's name changed to say "University" instead of "College", so this category and all subcategories should reflect the new article title of Mount St. Mary's University (Los Angeles). Arbor to SJ (talk) 00:30, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per nom. John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:32, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per nom. Oculi (talk) 08:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as nominated. Sounds good in principle, but the subcats should be named consistently. Either rename them all or rename none ... and the since the subcats are not listed, they can't be renamed via this discussion. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:03, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.