Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 February 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 4[edit]

Category:Medical and health associations based in Croatia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 February 12#Category:Medical_and_health_associations_based_in_Croatia. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: In line with similar categories Rathfelder (talk) 22:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • True, but Category:Organizations by country is splendidly coherent, with just one sore thumb. Oculi (talk) 18:30, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • As far as Medical and health organisations go there doesn't generally seem to be any issue about where they are based. It is very rare for them not to operate in the place where they are based. Rathfelder (talk) 23:52, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
true, but there are many thousands of Medical and health organizations which are firmly settled in one place. Rathfelder (talk) 13:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are missing the point of 'based in'. It is to exclude (from the category) organisations present in a country but not based there. EG WHO is present in Croatia. Oculi (talk) 21:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why do we want to to exclude organisations present in a country but not based there? Rathfelder (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Management terminology[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: merge, the articles in these categories are not about terms but about concepts, just like the articles in the parent category. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
see also some previous "terminology" discussions
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_February_26#Category:Terminology_of_Carl_Jung
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_November_5#Category:Aviation_terminology
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_September_6#Category:Habitat_(ecology)_terminology
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_October_19#Category:Seismology_and_earthquake_terminology
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_February_21#Category:Warfare_terminology
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_May_24#Category:Statistical_terminology
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_September_5#Category:Rally_racing_terminology
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_27#Category:Labor_terminology
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_September_30#Category:Globalization_terminology
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_2#Category:Flag_design_terms

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:South African footballer[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: already speedy deleted per WP:C1 by admin @RHaworth. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Recently created category that duplicates Category:South African soccer players. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:59, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, ideally speedily. Category was created by an account evading a block. --Yamla (talk) 12:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 13:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute academic journals[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: To match the article, MDPI and the actual name of the publisher. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment it would probably be better to split the article. Then we could keep the category name. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:50, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Great Lakes Premier League seasons[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: a procedural close as moot. A CfD based on WP:GNG is pointless. If there a problem with the articles, CfD can't fix.
The 3 AfDs were relisted on 12 February: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Premier League of America season, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Premier League of America season, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Great Lakes Premier League season. If all 3 are deleted, then this category can be speedy deleted as empty per WP:C1. If one or more is kept and someone still wants to delete the category, feel free to open a new CfD. . --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Nominating this category for deletion alongside the articles within the category, all of which fail WP:GNG. Jay eyem (talk) 00:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait. This CfD depends entirely upon the AfD discussions. If the consensus is to delete those articles, this can be speedied as an empty category. If the consensus is to keep, this category will still be needed. Grutness...wha? 03:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 15:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait – it is this cfd that is not needed, per Grutness above. Oculi (talk) 17:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Await outcome of AFDs. If the articles are deleted, this can be speedied as empty. If they are kept, we need to keep this. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait If all article are deleted via AfD, it should be deleted by CSD C1, else is keep. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 02:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.