Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 March 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 14[edit]

Category:Ethnic Armenian lawyers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 2#Category:Ethnic Armenian lawyers. xplicit 04:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overcategorization by trivial intersection. There is not enough of a distinct history of Ethnic Armenians in these professions to warrant a separate category. There is no need to merge to nationality and profession based categories since all articles are already in an appropriate subcategory. TM 13:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:EGRS, these combinations are not "recognized as a distinct and unique cultural topic[s]". "The basis for creating such a category is not the number of individuals who could potentially be filed in the group, but whether there's a specific cultural context for the grouping beyond the mere fact that politicians of that ethnic background happen to exist."--TM 22:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And what about architects, economists etc etc? I would probably support if this nomination would cover all relevant subcategories but I can't see the benefit of nominating only these seven and leave the others alone. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Whether there are oversights on my part on nominating certain categories or not should not stop us from merging these categories. I would happily support another nomination for other non-notable intersections.--TM 19:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- Some of these are somewhat small, but the parent is tagged as a container. Many of the subcats are sufficiently populated to be kept. I suspect there are people in an Armenian category who ought to be in these. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:20, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the parent category is tagged as a container, nor should it be.--TM 19:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Members of the Election Committee of Hong Kong, 2000–2005[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: nomination withdrawn. Grutness...wha? 00:52, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Move back to original title since it was the term of office of the EC. Lmmnhn (talk) 06:04, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I have little to say one way or the other on this, but I tidied up the nomination , which was not done correctly. I will say, however, that this category has a messy history. @Lmmnhn: originally created it as 2000–2006 then moved it to 2000–2007; @QBear: then moved it to 2000–2005. Neither of these moves seem to have been discussed anywhere. As things currently stand, there is a gap from 2005 to 2007, as all other ECoHK categories run in five year terms starting and ending in years ending in 2 or 7. However, the Hong Kong electoral process seems wuite baffling to me, and Wikipedia's articles cloud rather than clarify what the year range for these categories should be. Grutness...wha? 11:16, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sorry, I take back my request. The term of office of the 1st Election Committee elected in 2000 was five years according to the CHIEF EXECUTIVE ELECTION ORDINANCE. Lmmnhn (talk) 12:14, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • OK - I'll list this as a withdrawn nomination. Looks like there's a short 2005-2007 period with different members, perhaps. @Lmmnhn: - in future please nominate categories using the procedure listed here. Grutness...wha? 00:52, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.