The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining e.g. for Aleochara. See previous CFDs e.g. for spiders. For info: there is a list that is much more comprehensive than the category. DexDor(talk) 19:06, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: I tried to get this done through speedy, but now I'm here. The main article was moved from 'automobile' to 'car' four years ago, and this subject is clearly the primary topic of the word 'cars'. Consistency with the main article is desirable, and 'cars' is a better title for the category for all the reasons we moved the article. There is already a category for motor vehicles broadly, to match with the article motor vehicle, so that should not be an issue. Can we tidy this up? RGloucester — ☎ 16:21, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It was rejected at that time because a certain administrator wanted to contest the RM outcome, right after it occurred...but now the article title has been stable for four years. Do you have any legitimate reason to oppose this request, rather than going on about what happened four years ago? RGloucester — ☎ 00:29, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support in the spirit of WP:C2D. Having the article at the new title for four years is a sufficiently long time. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, noting that there are many sub-cats which would need to be renamed accordingly. If this looks like it will be approved, I suggest that someone re-lists it, adding at least the main sub-cats at the next level, after which the rest could follow as speedy. – FayenaticLondon 20:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Establishments in Lower Burma by year[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Alternatively, merge the first one but keep the others, and split/rename all the establishments and year categories within Category:Years of the 19th century in Burma from 1824 to 1885 to Lower Burma / Upper Burma. I think only 1852 would require both. – FayenaticLondon 10:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support for consistency. If desired, the alternative should be discussed in a separate nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:59, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:do not rename. Good Ol’factory(talk) 21:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary capitalization of "highways". Should also apply to all 49 subcategories (are there no highways in Hawaii?) Bradv 05:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment these are specifically about roads that are part of the United States Numbered Highway System, which indeed is not in Hawaii. (Alaska Route 2 isn't actually part of that system either, though it was proposed at one point). The various Category:Interstate Highways in Wyoming categories are a similar (and possibly stronger) argument to rename to avoid excessive capitalization. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:52, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The nom would be correct if this was a set of descriptive titles per WP:NDESC ... but it isn't.
Support Since there is no entity called "U.S. Highways", then it is not a title. Laurel Lodged (talk) 20:44, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but you are incorrect. Mangoe (talk) 20:53, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. U.S. Highways refer specifically to the United States Numbered Highway System. –Fredddie™ 04:02, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per proper name of system and component highways. SounderBruce 04:03, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because this refers to just the U.S. Highways, not the U.S. highways (meaning any highway in the US). --Rschen7754 05:41, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.