The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Deleted by RHaworth. L293D (☎ • ✎) 16:43, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: not a normal category page. L293D (☎ • ✎) 16:00, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete. Timrollpickering 18:45, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The category's creator has admitted at Category talk:Tajikistani orientalists that The term "Orientalist" is problematic, yet he had previously set up these two categories with only one member article. – FayenaticLondon 11:49, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Obscure scope, object to many POV issues and in any case WP:SMALLCAT. Place Clichy (talk) 14:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename/Delete/Merge. Timrollpickering 18:47, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Eponymous category for a musician who doesn't have the volume of spinoff content needed to warrant one. As always, every musician does not automatically get one of these the moment he has the standard albums category + songs category + BLP + navbox -- musicians get eponymous categories only in highly rarefied situations where there's a lot of additional content that needs artist-related categorization outside the standard categorization schemes that every artist already has. Bearcat (talk) 06:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Military commanders who never lost a battle[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, this concerns a non-defining characteristic. It is perfectly suitable for listification, the list already exists: Commanders who never lost a battle. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:32, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and listify per nom. Place Clichy (talk) 14:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What counts as a battle? Plenty of military commanders have never fought a battle. Rathfelder (talk) 15:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Merge. Timrollpickering 18:44, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:upmerge to both parent categories, per WP:SMALLCAT. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
