The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: No real content. The note says "Note: Category:French scholars is different.", and it is. But no articles have appeared. It is a genuine problem that academics and scholars are mobile. We claim to categorise them by nationality, but it's very unusual for a biographical article to say anything explicit about nationality, so for people who move about we have to guess. Nationality law in most places is actually quite complicated, so it would be surprising if quite a lot are not mis-categorised. Rathfelder (talk) 17:54, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; there is no need to merge, as the sub-cat is also in the parents via other hierarchies. The category originally held Category:Collège de France faculty but most of the members of that one do, naturally, appear to be French. – FayenaticLondon 13:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, "foreign" scholars who lived in France will also be counted as French scholars. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:00, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Consistency with all other "Spacecraft launched by …" categories from Spacecraft by launch system — JFGtalk 11:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Consistency with all other "Spacecraft launched by …" categories from Spacecraft by launch system — JFGtalk 11:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People associated with the Metropolitan Opera[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Years of the 20th century in Mandatory Palestine[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:upmerge, all years in Mandatory Palestine are 20th-century, hence the scope of the parent category is identical to this one. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support since there can be no other century category. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:09, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - indeed redundant.GreyShark (dibra) 12:08, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete The hour a crime happened is not notable enough to be a category, WP:OVERCAT. Tornado chaser (talk) 02:29, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Sometimes the time that a crime occurred cannot be determined accurately. Probable WP:ARBITRARYCAT fail as well. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:23, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Overcategorization and non-defining characteristic. • Gene93k (talk) 08:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Risible. Oculi (talk) 10:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
