Category:College football 1860s season stubs[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. MER-C 09:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: only 2 teams played college football in the 1860s, there will never be more than two articles that could possibly be in the category, not enough for a separate stub category Joeykai (talk) 23:49, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Category has already been emptied. LizRead!Talk! 01:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
While technically stubs for individual games would be possible, it seems unlikely this will ever get close to the 50-60 stubs required before a category should be created, so delete and upmerge any stubs or templates into the appropriate parents. Grutness...wha? 05:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. MER-C 09:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary category per WP:OCEPON for what amounts to one related article. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:04, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:speedy delete G7. – FayenaticLondon 22:04, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I had to go through the category creator's edits to find out. It was RCTI+. The category creatory removed it from the cat 2 hrs after I nominated the cat.[1] --AussieLegend (✉) 05:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Indonesian companies established in 2020[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:speedy delete G7. – FayenaticLondon 22:01, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: orphaned cat, only 1 entry AussieLegend (✉) 09:12, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Category has been emptied. LizRead!Talk! 01:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The category creatory removed the only article in the cat from it 2 hrs after I nominated the cat.[2] --AussieLegend (✉) 05:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
