Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 December 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 21[edit]

Category:Spiders in culture[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 04:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category:Spiders in popular culture is the only content Rathfelder (talk) 23:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Poety by Lewis Carroll[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete already implemented by User:Grutness (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 21:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Misspelled; corrected spelling has been populated with contents from here. Happy days, LindsayHello 15:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, as category's sloppy creator... sorry, and thanks for catching! Phil wink (talk) 15:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Computer science by country[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. MER-C 10:13, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Information technology heirarchy is much better populated. Rathfelder (talk) 15:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No articles Rathfelder (talk) 15:41, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 10 articles, mostly about software Rathfelder (talk) 15:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No articles Rathfelder (talk) 15:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only 1 article. about a School of Computational Sciences Rathfelder (talk) 15:37, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No articles Rathfelder (talk) 15:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No articles Rathfelder (talk) 15:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No articles, just 2 biography sub-categories. Rathfelder (talk) 15:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only contents is Category:Bangladeshi computer scientists Rathfelder (talk) 15:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 08:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do not change Computer science and Information technology articles show that they are different areas of knowledge and as such deserve to have separate, parallel category structures. Deletion serves no valid WP purpose. Nomination confuses such different subjects. Hmains (talk) 00:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The question is not what is deserving. There isnt enough content to justify these categories.Rathfelder (talk) 12:29, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Transformers factions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 04:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Every subcategory of this category has been nominated for deletion or merging, and the category itself only includes two articles, neither of which will probably survive for long. Delete as useless. JIP | Talk 17:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 08:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rings in comics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge, also to Category:Rings. MER-C 04:21, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Very specific category with little utility. TTN (talk) 13:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 08:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Transformers lines and sublines[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 04:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Seems like a pointless subcategorization. The parent category could fit everything. TTN (talk) 14:36, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 08:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gastropods of Japan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 04:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per the advice at Wikipedia:WikiProject Gastropods/Categories and non-defining in many cases e.g. Tectus pyramis.
Note: I've already removed some articles (that had no mention of Japan) from this category e.g. Turbo argyrostomus and Tonna luteostoma. For info: There is List of non-marine molluscs of Japan. DexDor (talk) 07:14, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 08:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Project Scarlett software[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensusa new discussion on the 4th-gen Xbox categories has superseded this one. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 23:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Most Horizontal Primate (talk) 02:21, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 08:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.