Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 December 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 24 December 26 >

December 25[edit]

Category:Living fossils[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 03:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The category text says "Life forms thought extinct ..., but later found alive; or in an alternative definition ...".  The Living fossil article says things such as "The term "living fossil" is much misunderstood in popular media in particular, in which it often is used meaninglessly. In professional literature the expression seldom appears and ... has been used inconsistently.".  This indicates that (whilst the concept may be of interest) it isn't a suitable characteristic for categorization of articles about species etc.  Note: some of the articles (e.g. Pelican) are already in a more precise subcategory such as Category:Extant Chattian first appearances. Note: 2006 discussion closed as no consensus. Note: example of a previous similar CFD. DexDor (talk) 18:44, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. With multiple definitions of "living fossil" given in the category text itself (and more definitions in the main article), the category is hopelessly subjective and untenable. The concept/definition I find most interesting would be "taxa first described based on fossils and later found to have living representatives" (with coelacanth as the canonical example). And that concept aligns somewhat more precisely with one of the multiple definitions/concepts at Lazarus taxon/Category:Lazarus taxa. Not sure that the Lazarus taxa category is appropriate either. The articles for living fossils and Lazarus taxa both have poorly curated lists of examples. Perhaps something like list of fossil taxa later found to have extant members would be of interest, but a poorly named category is not the right way to go. Plantdrew (talk) 03:40, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Warhammer Fantasy Armies[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 03:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only two articles. TTN (talk) 16:05, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ismaili Shia dynasties[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 03:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Redundant: the Ismailis are a branch of Shiism. (cf. similar discussion in the past) Constantine ✍ 14:52, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Catholic propagandists in the Balkans[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 January 2#Category:Catholic propagandists in the Balkans

Category:Historians of monastic history[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 03:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The existing title is redundant and inconsistent with the rest of the category tree. (Additionally, if you interpret the category name literally, it is for scholars studying the history of the history of monasticism.) 142.160.131.220 (talk) 08:15, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People who were expelled from school[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 03:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Purely trivial and non-defining category. Vaporgaze (talk) 07:58, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:05, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, as non-defining. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:35, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose when you apply for university, this is one of the first questions that is asked. We have other educational categories, so this one should be included as well. Merry Christmas everyone, even if you've been expelled from school.--Prisencolin (talk) 19:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. --Bduke (talk) 08:29, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I see no problem with this category if the sourcing is reliable. This is no different to categories for criminal convictions, which could also be "non-defining" if they were before the person was in the public eye, or the offences were of a minor nature. So there is a Category:People convicted of assault for every person convicted of that offence, even if it did not cause bodily harm and they received a non-custodial sentence, but not for somebody going so far as to be expelled from school? 2A00:23C5:E1AB:4500:D5FB:2702:48E3:B57A (talk) 14:26, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OSE. DexDor (talk) 15:58, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_December_25&oldid=1073192006"