Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 December 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 28 December 30 >

December 29[edit]

Category:Spanish Shintoists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 04:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article, about an academic. Doesn't say he is a Shintoist. Rathfelder (talk) 21:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Big Brother (UK) seasons[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 04:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Opposed speedy. The main article of the categories is Big Brother (British TV series), and it's also a subcategory of Category:Big Brother (British TV series). Armbrust The Homunculus 16:37, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:C2D. I do not have an opinion on the word "seasons" (this came up in the speedy discussion). Marcocapelle (talk) 22:32, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Celebrity Big Brother (UK) seasons[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 04:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Opposed speedy. The main article of the category is Celebrity Big Brother (British TV series). Armbrust The Homunculus 16:36, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:C2D. I do not have an opinion on the word "seasons" (this came up in the speedy discussion). Marcocapelle (talk) 22:30, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Clube Ferroviário de Maputo players[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 January 6#Category:Clube Ferroviário de Maputo players

Category:Football clubs in Luxembourg by city[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 04:37, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There is only one city in Luxembourg Rathfelder (talk) 12:57, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 12:23, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. GiantSnowman 12:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, though I note there is more than one club in Dudelange, and ditto Esch-sur-Alzette. Grutness...wha? 03:01, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Edible bivalves[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 04:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Being edible (to humans) is subjective (see a recent CFD) and in many cases non-defining (e.g. articles such as Mytilus trossulus and Ensis ensis make no mention of edibility).  Note: no upmerge is needed as the articles are categorized by genus etc (in Category:Bivalves by classification). DexDor (talk) 12:45, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per precedent. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:29, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the previous deletions other edible mollusc categories. Plantdrew (talk) 18:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename. Many of our readers would be interested in bivalves commonly used as human food (though how many of our readers actually use categories?). If not "edible", then what term, "culinary bivalves"? Pelagic (talk) 23:34, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is Category:Commercial molluscs so a merge to that or a rename to Category:Commercial bivalves is an option. I think readers interested in culinary use of bivalves would be better off going to Bivalvia#Use_as_food (which could be expanded) (and possibly then going to the linked articles) than by going via the category to articles such as Saccostrea cucullata where use as food is barely mentioned. DexDor (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Exotic Revival[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 January 6#Category:Exotic Revival

Category:Decepticons[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Transformers robot characters; remains virtually uncontested after 7 weeks. MER-C 10:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Something like 25 remaining characters in the series. It previously had a maze like structure of some 400+ characters. After removing the redirects, all remaining characters fit comfortably into the primary parent category. This in-universe designation isn't particularly useful for the general reader, especially when most characters have 5+ variations listed on their pages. TTN (talk) 21:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 07:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MER-C 04:24, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Further comment, there are still 12 articles and 13 redirects in the category, so the category does not have to be upmerged by all means. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Of the 12 articles, three are Autobots, one is a planet-eating deity that is just called a Decepticon for marketing reasons, and one isn't even a Transformers character in the first place. JIP | Talk 08:57, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Feel free to purge articles that should not have been in this category in the first place. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:04, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_December_29&oldid=937650669"