Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 February 25

< February 24	February 26 >

February 25[edit]

Category:Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa contestants[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete.
To assist anyone wants to create a list article, I have made a list of the category's contents at WT:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 February 25#Category:Jhalak_Dikhhla_Jaa_contestants. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Convert Category:Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa contestants to article List of Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa participants

Nominator's rationale: Same as the other pages subcategories of Category:Dancing with the Stars participants (see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 April 30#Category:Dancing with the Stars participants for more) DannyS712 (talk) 21:00, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Listify if necessary, then delete -- as usual for performance categories. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Object to the idea I think it should stay as it is because a. In the Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa article it already says the details of its contestants, b. It is a organised way to tell about who was in it. What you are trying to do is making wikipedia as a dump it should be organised. Not being harsh just think know its not a good idea AT ALL. [User:NoraFatehi231|NoraFatehi231]] (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PERFCAT. Listifying is apparently no longer needed, per NoraFatehi231. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Best Actress Ophir Award winners[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete.
To assist anyone wants to create a list article, I have made a list of the category's contents at WT:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 February 25#Category:Best_Actress_Ophir_Award_winners. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:32, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Convert Category:Best Actress Ophir Award winners to article List of Ophir Award winners

Nominator's rationale: This category was overlooked at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 September 16#Ophir Award winners, where the other categories were listified. DannyS712 (talk) 20:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Convert per previous CfD. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:48, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Listify Certainly a workable list but not defining to the individual articles. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:37, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OCAWARD and the article Ophir Award mentions nothing about best actors and best actresses so the need for listification is also doubtful. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Capacitive touchscreen mobile phones[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Touchscreen mobile phones. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs)

Propose deleting Category:Capacitive touchscreen mobile phones (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Category created when capacitive touchscreen was a novelty. Now this is expected from any touchscreen device and would require all phones created in the last two decades to be included if we aimed to be complete. uKER (talk) 08:42, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:22, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Category:Touchscreen mobile phones while that still exists. Presumably the latter should be discussed in a fresh nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Years by city for Dublin City, Glasgow and Manchester[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:25, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal: To upmerge the following years by British and Irish cities to the decade category:

Nominator's rationale: The only British city with “years in” subcategories is London, with Berlin, Brussels, Istanbul, Hamburg, Moscow and Paris the only other European cities having the “by year” categories; see Category:2016 by city, Category:2017 by city & Category:2018 by city. The above categories are small and are not part of a series. Hugo999 (talk) 01:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all per nom.

We don't have enough coverage of those fine cities to populate by-year categories. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all -- The justification for 2000 could be that it was part of the 20th century, not 21st, but that is mere semantics. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:41, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.