Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 February 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 6 February 8 >

February 7[edit]

Category:Splendor Solis[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 08:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT already in Category:Alchemical documents so no need to upmerge Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:05, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Can't think of a potential 2nd article here, let alone a 5th. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Islamist insurgents[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 April 8#Category:Islamist insurgents

Category:Professional wrestling rosters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted at WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 March 19#Category:Professional_wrestling_rosters. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Changing name of category to match the pages within in. All were recently made consistent and category should match. Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 22:11, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anti-pornography movements[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted at WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 March 11#Category:Anti-pornography_movements. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)4[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This was suggested on the Speedy page, but it did not fit the criteria there. I am inclined to agree with the original nominator that there is an overall anti-pornography movement. – Fayenatic London 17:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Copy of discussion on Speedy page
  • Inclined to keep plural (if there's one movement, why are there so many articles, I ask myself). It seems unlikely to me, given the geographic and time ranges, that half these groups have even heard of the other half. Mary Whitehouse's lot (older British readers will recall it), now rebranded Mediawatch-UK, is not there, nor are a number of older groups, now presumably defunct. Nor is the US National Legion of Decency. As always, people should spend less time worrying about the minutiae of category names, and more about whether they contain the obvious basic contents! You know who you are. Johnbod (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bear in mind, there is a fundamental distinction between movements and organizations. Movements are comprised of organizations along with large numbers of individuals. This is true across the board, regardless of what particular movement you're talking about. In this case, all of those organizations are part of the Anti-pornography movement. Anomalous+0 (talk) 08:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnbod: - I should have pinged you when I posted my reply to your comment. Anomalous+0 (talk) 10:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It's not a single movement. For one, anti-porn feminism and anti-porn evangelicalism are quite different. feminist (talk) 15:52, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tend to support. The article Anti-pornography movement in the United Kingdom (singular) suggests it is one movement originated from two different perspectives (a feminist and a conservative/religious perspective). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Scandinavian royalty[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted at WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 March 11#Scandinavian_royalty. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: more consistent with Category:Scandinavian royal houses, siblings in Category:Burial sites of European royal families, and the contents of these categories which use "House" rather than "family" or "dynasty". – Fayenatic London 13:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Copy of discussion on Speedy page
  • Oppose - more people will find these categories more quickly if their names begin with "Royal families of ...". --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support, only for consistency reasons. The form "Royal houses of Norway" is actually more to the point than "Norwegian royal houses" which may imply "Royal houses from Norway", so a wider nomination with a reverse rename would be appreciated. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters with energy manipulation powers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Option A. Timrollpickering (Talk) 21:11, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: procedural nomination following inconclusive discussion on Speedy page. – Fayenatic London 13:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Copy of discussion on Speedy page
  • Interestingly, this category and all of its siblings have been deleted in 2007 per this CfD and recreated later. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Option A A hyphen is needed here, since "energy manipulation" serves as an adjective to "abilities". Dimadick (talk) 13:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Arthurian games[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering (Talk) 21:12, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The first one will be clearer, despite the majority of siblings being named "Arthurian [media]"; the contents are not games played at Arthur's court. The proposed names are consistent with Category:Arthurian legend, Category:Minor planets named from Arthurian legend and Category:Locations associated with Arthurian legend. The first one was rejected on the Speedy page, see below. – Fayenatic London 10:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Copy of discussion on Speedy page
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Right-Wing Militia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted at WP:CFD 2019 March 11#Category:Right-Wing_Militia. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Procedural nomination following suggestion at Speedy page, matching article Militia organizations in the United States. – Fayenatic London 10:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Copy of discussion on Speedy page
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Caucus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted at WP:CFD 2019 March 11. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The current name is excessively vague; the category contains articles about caucuses used in selecting US presidential candidates. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:13, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Or that. Johnbod (talk) 15:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_February_7&oldid=1138412094"