Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 June 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 12[edit]

Category:GameMaker: Studio games[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 18:51, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per the rebranding of GameMaker Studio, removing the colon. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Video game fan user templates[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 20:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Smaller category is almost unused: only five members: 2 subcategories & 3 templates. Merging will also allow to recategorize Category:Video game user templates as Category:Fandom user templates, which will slightly improve discoverability of its contents. —⁠andrybak (talk) 16:31, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:18th-century & 19th-century English opera singers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose upmerging:
Category:18th-century English opera singers to Category:18th-century British opera singers and Category:18th-century English singers (plus Category:18th-century British women singers if appropriate)
Category:19th-century English opera singers to Category:19th-century British opera singers and Category:19th-century English singers (plus Category:19th-century British women singers if appropriate)
Nominator's rationale: The 18th-century and 19th-century categories for English opera singers are small, and the equivalent categories for Scottish, Welsh (and Northern Ireland/Ireland if appropriate) would be even smaller; so retaining only the parent categories for British opera singers by century is preferable. English singers by century would still be categories in the 18th and 19th centuries. Hugo999 (talk) 04:53, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That is why I said "if appropriate" Hugo999 (talk) 20:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge English to British. The singers looks as if it is a mirror of the British opera one and might be left as a parent in case we get some other kind of singer (folk, chorister, etc). Peterkingiron (talk) 17:39, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Intersex actresses[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. to Category:Intersex people (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article in the category. Possibly merge to Category:Non-binary actors, but I'm not sure if intersex falls under the non-binary umbrella. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 00:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Category:Intersex people, at least. I doubt whether non-binary is appropriate here. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:44, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Category:Intersex people; we don't need a WP:SMALLCAT occupational intersection for just one person. Intersex people may certainly identify as non-binary, but are not always automatically deemed as such: non-binary is about how you perceive yourself in terms of identity, not what is or isn't in your panties, and intersex people can still identify as male or female. Bearcat (talk) 15:29, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.