The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The only case I can see for keeping these categories would be if it helped organise the parent decade category, but it doesn't. The largest "Category:YYY0s films" is Category:2010s films, which currently has 54 subcats. Adding a further nine subcats (i.e. one per each of the tens year, minus the deleted container) won't overload Category:2010s films, and the years will sort neatly at the start of the list. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 18:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Contributor's rationale: The point of decade-by-year categories and their navigation templates is to help users do historical surveys. —Coder Dan (talk) 20:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Coder Dan, how is that aided by a decade-by-year category rather than just a decade category?
Merge per nom. These categories have the same scope. Dimadick (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Davidson Media Group radio stations[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: It seems Davidson Media Group has no radio stations. --woodensuperman 16:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as creator. Similar to the associated template, the company has sold off their stations over time. Mlaffs (talk) 01:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the company has sold off its radio stations and no longer has any left to categorize, then the category is no longer necessary. Bearcat (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:WP:NONDEFINING category - type of headlamp is not a common way to categorize a car (such as classification or body style). Vossanovao< 14:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Creator's rationale: - I see what you're saying. My rebuttal though is that there are numerous other categories which group vehicles/cars with notable technical features or design elements and they seem to have proved themselves relevant. For instance "Automobiles with gull-wing doors", "Automobiles with backbone chassis", "Vehicles with four-wheel steering", "Vehicles with CVT transmission", and "Vehicles with wheel motors". Many of those articles have been around for over 10 years (since 2008), and even the newest created, "Vehicles with backbone chassis" has been around for 2 years and so have proved to have staying power. They all tackle niche, yet notable features, gull-wing doors, four-wheel steering, CVT transmissions, etc, that don't fit into a common categorization (classification, body style) and that people are likely to be interested in. I see no reason why hidden headlamps wouldn't be at least as relevant, if not possibly more, than those features. Thank you for your consideration. TKOIII (talk) 15:25, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Understandable, but other design features, like type of door, shouldn't really be categorized as well, for the same non-defining reason. I would instead suggest such categories be converted/merged into lists (see WP:CPN). --Vossanovao< 16:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom before we get categories for things like cars with retractable radio aerials, cars whose boot/trunk can be unlocked from the dashboard etc. DexDor(talk) 21:47, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete Main article and filmography with little room for growth. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete Main article and list of awards, with little room for growth. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:56, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete Main article and a character subcategory with little room for growth. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
We don't need an eponymous category that only contains a works category. The dozens of articles and subcats are correctly in the works tree, this does not add anything. --woodensuperman 09:15, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and per WP:OCEPON. The categories are adequately interlinked; no need for this eponcat. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 09:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete - not enough content to warrant a category, per WP:OCEPON --DannyS712 (talk) 19:44, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete not enough content to warrant a category, per WP:OCEPON --DannyS712 (talk) 19:44, 16 March 2019 (UTC)----[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete Main article and a works subcategory with little room for growth. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete Main article and a works subcategory with little room for growth. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:51, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom. Oculi (talk) 19:35, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Main article and an image subcategory with little room for growth. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support Pointless Russian doll. Johnbod (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
