The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Not enough entries to warrant an eponymous category per WP:OCEPON. The "works by" category is sufficient. 212.135.65.247 (talk) 13:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary category layer. Note: no upmerge to Category:Eukaryotes is necessary. DexDor(talk) 12:42, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per nom. Oculi (talk) 15:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, yet another one of Caftaric's unnecessary category creations for higher level taxa that aren't familiar to most folks. Plants/animals/fungi are appropriate categories at this level; no need to group those three together as eukaryotes. Plantdrew (talk) 20:17, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Parent category contains only one member. --Bsherr (talk) 05:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. Also would have been valid use of speedy criterion C2D. (non-admin closure)Bsherr (talk) 05:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The article South Pacific Mandate has been moved to South Seas Mandate after a WP:RM discussion. I have moved associated articles to match this, but have no experience in moving categories. -- Polly Tunnel (talk) 12:02, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT, there is only one article in the category and little potential for expansion. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Burial sites of the House of Kęsgailos[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. the wub"?!" 23:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Contains one article, no reasonable prospect of expansion. Renata (talk) 00:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support in principle -- Three of these lead back to a single article Vilnius Cathedral. The question that I do not see a simple answer to is how to prevent a loss of data. I think the answer may be the categorise those three families into Category:Burials in Vilnius Cathedral, which would fit a burial by cemetery series. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:44, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(amended vote) Category:Burials at Vilnius Cathedral fits the bill perfectly. I was wary of these categories which felt too like OCPERF or OCVENUE categories, which are normally not allowed. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:38, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
