Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 July 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< July 10 July 12 >

July 11[edit]

Category:Villages in Belthangady taluka[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. bibliomaniac15 02:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Belthangady Taluka redirects to Belthangady. Fuddle (talk) 23:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:56, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per Marcocapelle as a WP:SMALLCAT. Seems like a better way to organize this for now, and perhaps there are articles in the larger category that could be subdivided more intelligently. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nazis who committed suicide by location[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. bibliomaniac15 04:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete, yeah, can't see this growing. Both subcats are in the appropriate suicides by location categories. Grutness...wha? 04:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per above, redundant and unneeded layer of detail. Inter&anthro (talk) 20:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 09:34, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Décastar[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 July 27#Category:Décastar

Category:Wikipedia requested images of Oklahoma[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. bibliomaniac15 04:53, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Seems to be an unnecessary and duplicative subcategory within the main category for Oklahoma image requests Jmertel23 (talk) 10:45, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nominator. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Can't help but wonder whether "images" would be better wording for the entire req scheme given that all photos are images, but not vice versa. That's a debate for another day though. Grutness...wha? 04:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 10:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Singapore Sports School[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 19:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Only the head article Singapore Sports School, Category:Singapore Sports School alumni and a logo. All adequately categorised, so no need to merge. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:05, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Saterland Frisian language[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 19:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Only the head article Saterland Frisian language and a template. Both are adequately categorised, so no need to merge. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Selwyn, Queensland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Shire of Cloncurry. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Only the head article Selwyn, Queensland and one other. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Severn Area Rescue Association[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 19:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Only the head article Severn Area Rescue Association and 4 redirects to that page. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dinmore, Queensland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 19:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Only the one article Dinmore railway station, and the only one which could be added is the head article Dinmore, Queensland. Both are adequately categorised, so need to merge. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Karrabin, Queensland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 19:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Only the head article Karrabin, Queensland and one other:Karrabin railway station. Both are adequately categorised, so no need to merge. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:56, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ramenye[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Guslitsa. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT: only one article. The title Ramenye is a disambiguation which i just created. We don't appear to have any article on a Ramenye in Moscow Oblast. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:18, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Newbridge, New South Wales[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Blayney Shire. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Contains only the eponymous Newbridge, New South Wales and one other article. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:15, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Murray River Council smallcats[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Murray River Council. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging:
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Each of these categories for small towns in Murray River Council contains only two pages: the eponymous article and one other article. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kenebri, New South Wales[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Warrumbungle Shire. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Contains only the eponymous Kenebri, New South Wales and one other article. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cataract, New South Wales[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 09:06, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Contains only the eponymous article Cataract, New South Wales and one other article. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Couridjah, New South Wales[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: procedural close since this category has been subsequently nominated at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_July_17#Suburbs_of_Sydney_smallcats. bibliomaniac15 21:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Contains only the eponymous Couridjah, New South Wales and one other article: Couridjah railway station. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:48, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Brownlow Hill, New South Wales[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Wollondilly Shire. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:06, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Contains only the eponymous Brownlow Hill, New South Wales and one other article: Brownlow Hill Estate. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Upper Lachlan Shire smallcats[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Upper Lachlan Shire. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose merging:
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT.
Category:Bannaby, New South Wales Contains only the eponymous Bannaby, New South Wales and one other article: Hillas Farm Homestead. The other categories follow the same pattern: head article plus one other. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Greater Hume Shire smallcats[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Greater Hume Shire. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose merging:
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT.
Each category contains only two pages: the head article plus one other. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rosenborg Castle Gardens[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 09:06, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Contains only the eponymous Rosenborg Castle Gardens and one other article. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Salussola[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 19:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Only the head article and one other. Both are adequately categorised. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Salem, South Carolina[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 19:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per WP:SMALLCAT. Only the head article Salem, South Carolina and one other. Both are adequately categorised, so no need to merge. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:41, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 18:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Sandlot film series[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename as nominated. bibliomaniac15 04:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The common way to have categories for film series. ★Trekker (talk) 14:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There actually isn't as much consistency about the use of "films" vs. "(film series)" in categories as any of the participants here claim. Would appreciate more feedback about this.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 17:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Special Natural Monuments[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: manual deletion. MER-C 11:04, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Most of the articles in this category are species (e.g. Rock ptarmigan, Crested ibis, Bonin white-eye, Firefly squid) for which having this designation is a non-defining characteristic. See also WP:OC#AWARD.  The list here (at the bottom of the table) shows that if this category was complete it would also include e.g. Otter. DexDor (talk) 17:00, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The list (and maybe some of the non-species articles) should be upmerged to the parent category Category:Natural monuments of Japan which should also be purged of articles about species (e.g. Dormouse). DexDor (talk) 04:49, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Islam by decade[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge C19 to Category:19th-century Islam except for those contents which are already in Category:19th-century mosques. Delete the rest, which only contain sub-cats for mosques. As a consequence of this CFD I will also delete Category:1898 in Islam, an isolated year category which only contains Category:Mosques completed in 1898. – Fayenatic London 17:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
more decade categories
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer, these categories only contain one subcategory each. The amount of en.wp articles about Islam before the year 1979 is too small to populate these decade categories decently. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Populate where possible but delete where still small. There's a lot of underpopulating here for example Partition of India belongs in the 1940s category, and Arab Revolt belongs in the 1920s category). Grutness...wha? 04:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've made a start, I think all the 20th-century ones are now keeps. Grutness...wha? 10:01, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose per WP:SMALLCAT and WP:DEMOLISH. Islam has been one of the world's major religions since well before the earliest category in this series, and there should be little difficulty populating with current content. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to century categories. These categories are not empty, and it seems reasonable to group people and events by century. Dimadick (talk) 15:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete those that are just place holders for "mosques completed in ..." or for which only a few of articles are available. Given the breadth of "Islam", there may be more later and then they can be recreated but not useful now. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question. How would anyone benefit from ripping out these parts of the category tree? How does it help readers or editors?
Intermediate category layers like this are a helpful part of the category tree which allow multiple navigational paths in the category tree. Ripping them out makes the category tree harder to navigate. So what's the claimed benefit to offset this damage? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:35, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • With the alternative to merge, as proposed by Dimadick, nothing will be ripped out. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:19, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Marcocapelle, Dimadick's proposal still involves ripping out lots of decade categories.
What's the claimed benefit to offset this damage? How does it help readers or editors to remove this layer of navigation? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
After the merge, you can go straight from Faraizi movement to the 4 other articles in Category:19th century in Islam. And when you are also interested in mosques you can still dive into the 19th-century mosques subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcocapelle, I will try asking for a third time: what is the claimed benefit of removing these categories? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have already answered the question above. In summary, more efficient navigation by skipping a category layer that is (nearly) empty. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:54, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
All you achieve by removing these categories is to remove a navigational path. None of the paths which remain becomes any shorter.
So there is no gain in navigational efficiency, just a reduction in navigational pathways. -BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @BrownHairedGirl: there is definitely a gain in navigational path. Suppose someone is at Faraizi movement and you want to find articles about Islam in the same period.
The current path is Faraizi movement -> Category:1810s in Islam -> Category:19th-century Islam -> Timeline of 19th-century Muslim history.
After the merge the path will become Faraizi movement -> Category:19th-century Islam -> Timeline of 19th-century Muslim history.
In the current situation an inexperienced user may even quickly give up after not finding any other article in Category:1810s in Islam which is a situation that will not happen after the merge.
The path becomes even longer in the current situation when they also want to read the articles in the 1880s and 1890s subcats, but after the merge the path to the 1880s and 1890s articles will stay short:
The current path is Faraizi movement -> Category:1810s in Islam -> Category:19th-century Islam -> Category:1880s in Islam -> Ahmadiyya.
After the merge the path will become Faraizi movement -> Category:19th-century Islam -> Ahmadiyya.
On the other hand, when someone is at a mosque and is interested in mosques built in the same period, nothing will change (i.e. nothing will become worse) after the merge.
For example Dzhumaya Mosque -> Category:Mosques completed in 1364 -> Category:Mosques completed in the 1370s -> Category:Mosques completed in 1370 -> Chaqchan Mosque (which is quite a long way for that matter).
To conclude, of course there is reduction, there is no disagreement on that, but the effect of reduction is efficiency (as it always is). Marcocapelle (talk) 21:19, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Marcocapelle, that's a misrepresentation, because you omit lateral navigation between the decade categories. There is no need to step back to the century category when you can go directly from one decade to another.
One of the examples you cite is: Faraizi movement -> Category:1810s in Islam -> Category:19th-century Islam -> Category:1880s in Islam -> Ahmadiyya.
But the actual path is one step shorter: Faraizi movement -> Category:1810s in Islam -> Category:19th-century Islam -> Category:1880s in Islam -> Ahmadiyya.
This is the issue that you consistently miss about chronology categories now that we have the 2-row version of {{Navseasoncats}} (i.e. {{Navseasoncats with decades below year}} and {{Navseasoncats with centuries below decade}}): that each category links directly to up to 21 other chronology categories. You describe the category tree as if the only navigation possible was from between a parent category and its subcat ... but I and several other editors have done masses of work over the last few years to ensure that this is no longer that case. So the "efficiency" gain which you claim is a thing of the past.
You do have a point about the distance to the by-century timeline articles, e.g. Timeline of 19th-century Muslim history. So I have resolved that by linking to the appropriate article in that series from every Islam chronology category. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to century categories if the decade categories are too small, per Dimadick. bibliomaniac15 21:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Achaemenid satraps of Greater Phrygia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Satraps of the Achaemenid Empire and Category:Phrygia. bibliomaniac15 02:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, just one article and unlikely to expand. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:War Cross with Sword (Norway)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 July 24#Category:War Cross with Sword (Norway)

Category:Nizams Special Soldiers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Hyderabad State Forces. bibliomaniac15 04:55, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The category contains one page on a military leader, one army, one community, and two neighbourhoods. It is not clear how this category is useful for navigation between related topics. – Fayenatic London 20:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 05:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Prime Time Entertainment Network[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 July 24#Category:Prime Time Entertainment Network

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_July_11&oldid=981857708"