Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< October 6 October 8 >

October 7[edit]

Category:Sportspeople by city or town in Ukraine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge as nominated for consistency. MER-C 14:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: They are all in cities Rathfelder (talk) 21:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Centuries in Kiev[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 18:44, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Following the naming of parent articles Kyiv and History of Kyiv. For consistency in naming with parent, sibling, and many child categories and articles. To match the scheme and pattern of all other chronological categories, including after spelling or name changes, for example:
Examples

Full list of proposed renamings:

Categories for renaming
 —Michael Z. 20:33, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for consistency with the previous renames. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - per Kyiv, Category:Kyiv. Oculi (talk) 12:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - per nom, Category:Kyiv, etc. Lev!vich 23:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support To match main article. Dimadick (talk) 15:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Contrary to some views that have been expressed, usage of Kiev vs. Kyiv is not a matter of an automatic cut-off date such as the early 1990s, it is a matter of context. In these chronology categories, the modern designation should therefore take precedence, for the entire tree. Place Clichy (talk) 14:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MBC TV[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 18:45, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per Dan Wescher, these categories are only about MBC TV. St3095 (?) 13:39, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support because "Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation" is the name of the company, not the channel. —ÐW(T•C) 06:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1987 TV series) characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 17:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Redundant. ★Trekker (talk) 11:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2003 TV series) characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 17:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Redundant. ★Trekker (talk) 11:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions, for what reason is it redundant, and shouldn't it be merged rather than deleted? Marcocapelle (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles guest characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 17:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non defining. ★Trekker (talk) 11:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ukrainian people by locality[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge/delete Timrollpickering (talk) 17:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This only contains Category:Sportspeople by city or town in Ukraine. It doesnt seem helpful to separate locality from location. Rathfelder (talk) 10:27, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Articles missing payload orbit parameters from October 2015[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 17:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary over-maintenance. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 10:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have no view on its merits, but will notify the relevant WikiProjects. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WikiProject Space Colonization[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy withdrawn. Found some categories to include in this defunct WPJ. (non-admin closure) Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 10:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one page in this category, which is a defunct WPJ. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 10:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Violence in Palestine[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 17#Category:Violence in Palestine

Category:Films directed by Scud (Danny Cheng Wan-Cheung)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename Timrollpickering (talk) 17:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: If this category name is going to contain disambiguation, it should match the disambiguation for the article Scud (filmmaker). Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:29, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Shorter titles are easier to use. Dimadick (talk) 15:37, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional Filipino people by occupation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fictional Filipino people. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 22:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article in the category. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 03:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Technology-related YouTube channels[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge Timrollpickering (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category:Technology-related YouTube channels is populated solely by a subcategory, Category:Technology YouTubers. This is my first time at CfD, so I'm not familiar with the common arguments, but I feel like this makes it a redundant category.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 02:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, as a redundant category layer, but rather upmerge to its parent categories instead of downmerge, just for a technical reason. I've noticed that automated downmerging does not change the parenting, while upmerging does. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't know much about categories and I trust that you do, so that sounds good to me!  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 03:01, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ministry of Intelligence (Iran)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename Timrollpickering (talk) 17:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The parent category is Category:Ministry of Intelligence (Iran) and the head article is Ministry of Intelligence (Iran); I propose renaming these categories to match. I also propose adding a "the" to each category. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People of the Al Mukhabarat Al A'amah[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename Timrollpickering (talk) 17:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Al Mukhabarat Al A'amah redirects to General Intelligence Presidency. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support just because the article is currently at that name. It sounds like a poor translation though. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Foreign Intelligence Service (Russia)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename Timrollpickering (talk) 17:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: SVR is ambiguous. The parent category is Category:Foreign Intelligence Service (Russia) and the head article is Foreign Intelligence Service (Russia). Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Critics of Humanism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. bibliomaniac15 05:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I believe that "humanism" should not be capitalized. The article Humanism generally does not capitalize the term in running text. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per nom. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this vague and generally dubious category - with only 3 obscure Anglophone members it would be laughably underpopulated if taken seriously. I'd doubt it is defining for any of them. Johnbod (talk) 17:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not oppose deletion either, in its current state the category does not serve a purpose. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Jonhnbod. Inclusion criteria seem to be arbitrary or unclear. Rename if kept. Place Clichy (talk) 14:06, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete it's better to use categories such as Category:20th-century British philosophers to categorize people and use text (e.g. at Humanism#Criticism and in the people's articles) to discuss details. DexDor (talk) 18:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Critics of Modernism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. bibliomaniac15 05:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I believe that "modernism" should not be capitalized. The article Modernism does not capitalize the term in running text. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per nom. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:34, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete Ridiculous category with only one really obscure member (avg 2 views a day), for whom this is probably not defining - if one knew what it meant. Really there is nothing in the stub article to justify this category. Too vague - Category:Critics of Modern art might have a chance, or critics of so-called Modernism in theology. If kept, do not rename - Modernism should capitalize in text & probably used to. Johnbod (talk) 17:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Jonhnbod. This applies to either too many people, or too few. Rename if kept. Place Clichy (talk) 14:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not oppose deletion either, in its current state the category does not serve a purpose. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_October_7&oldid=1138412408"