Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2[edit]

Category:Uiryeong Yeo clan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. bibliomaniac15 21:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Categorizing contemporary people by Korean clan (incidentally, sub-clan) seems pretty pointless, at least when clan adherence is not mentioned in any of the 2 articles therein, let alone sourced. Then, it is better not to tempt people to add irrelevant, unsourced categories - by eliminating the category. Geschichte (talk) 22:54, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the two biographies should be purged and thereafter it is a matter of WP:C2F. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:00, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:42-cylinder engines[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 10#Category:42-cylinder engines

Prix Versailles[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. bibliomaniac15 21:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Categories created by single purpose accounts to promote Prix Versailles, see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Prix Versailles. The main article is now deleted, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prix Versailles. Four more categories were nominated at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 July 21#Category:World selection for the Prix Versailles Airports. TSventon (talk) 08:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Block evasion: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MARdF. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:24, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
  • You are linking to web pages specifically about these buildings' nomination for Prix Versailles, that does not tell anything about definingness in general. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TSventon, you added [17] very specific information to the World Architecture Festival page. That page was created by the organisers themselves, and mainly updated by SPAs. It's not possible to add so specific information to the page without explicit interest. You also created the dedicated page INSIDE Festival, which is part of World Architecture Festival. The World Architecture Festival is merely known by some architects. That organisation awards buildings, as the Prix Versailles does, but the Prix Versailles adresses also the large public. There are not many awards with this scope. I can't believe you are not acting here for the UK-based World Architecture Festival. Apart from the University of Oxford, up to now your job was mostly correcting typos. Since one month [18] @ GeneralNotability, Prix Versailles deleting has been a major part of your work [19]. As we can see, your will was clearly to delete Prix Versailles mentions in all wiki: "If Fr Prix Versailles is deleted, will fr Wikipedia remove other mentions of the prize?" [20] @ Blablubbs and Jules*. You worked conscientiously for that. And you organised WP:CAN canvassing with that purpose: "you are obviously welcome to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prix Versailles as well. If Prix Versailles is deleted, then mentions of the award in other articles will probably be removed as well" [21] @ Netherzone. You said to Possibly: "I'm no specialist" about architecture and design. That is not true. [22] All this reveals manipulation with a big conflict of interest for the benefit of a competitor. 95.140.7.136 (talk) 11:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Blocked) IP editor, I edit subjects in Wikipedia I enjoy, including Oxford, architecture and typos. In July I noticed that Prix Versailles related content on Wikipedia had been added by a number of single purpose accounts so I felt obliged to report that at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard and do some work on following up the report. I made a few edits mentioning the World Architecture Festival in 2019, but I was and am not acting for them. TSventon (talk) 14:52, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

WikiProject Android categories[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 18:49, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: All related to Wikipedia:WikiProject Android (up for G5) created by blocked sock. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.