Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 June 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< June 14 June 16 >

June 15[edit]

Category:Auckland rugby union players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn nomination (non-admin closure) Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Tidyup following team page moves, and unify all the category names Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:26, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Many (most?) of the players categorised played for their provinces long before the NPC began in the mid 1970s. Perhaps "Foo provincial rugby union players" or similar might work, given that (despite NZ no longer having provinces) the teams are always known as the provincial teams? Grutness...wha? 06:13, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Grutness:, I'm happy for them to be of some different name, but for consistency to be used throughout. Happy to go with your suggestion if others feel the same way. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree - I'm particularly keen to see the team nicknames (Makos, Stags, etc) go, since they are a very new creation. Grutness...wha? 03:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose -- We should not be splitting categories according to championships or sporting franchises, unless there was a separate Auckland rugby team playing in a rival championship. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:22, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:National Provincial Championship[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 July 12#Category:National Provincial Championship

Category:Leopards (rugby team) players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Tidyup following previous page move Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:20, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Griffons (rugby team) players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Tidyup following previous page move Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Falcons (rugby team) players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Tidyup following previous page move Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pumas (rugby team) players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Tidyup following previous page move Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Western Province (rugby team) players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Tidyup following a previous page move Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:17, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lions (Super Rugby)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Tidyup following page move Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pro14[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:13, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Competition has been renamed United Rugby Championship Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:07, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Fayenatic london:, just getting to it. Moved another similar page as seen above and about to do the same for that one as well. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. I recommend expanding the category names within the hierarchies Rut templates and Rus templates by country, as these are not self-explanatory. – Fayenatic London 19:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Women's association football goalkeepers who have scored[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I am making this as a procedural nomination, as the parent category Category:Association football goalkeepers who have scored was discussed at CFD May 17 and there was consensus to delete it as non-defining. I have made a bare list of this one at Talk:List of goalscoring goalkeepers/List from categories#Pages in Category:Women's association football goalkeepers who have scored. – Fayenatic London 19:05, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:DYK/Project pages[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: While this may seem like a valid category, all sub-pages of Wikipedia:Did you know are correctly categorized in sub-categories of Category:Wikipedia Did you know so there is no need for this extra layer of sub-category. The one template here is already placed in several other DYK categories. Gonnym (talk) 10:13, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Nominator is probably right: no need for this extra layer of sub-category. --Just N. (talk) 13:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:DYK/Editnotices/Page[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Same scope. Gonnym (talk) 07:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Nominator is probably right: no need for this extra layer of sub-category. --Just N. (talk) 13:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:DYK/Pages/Redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. ✗plicit 06:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: All 3 categories here are for the same scope (one is upmerged at the same time). Gonnym (talk) 07:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Nominator is probably right: no need for this extra layer of sub-category. --
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:DYK/Nominations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. ✗plicit 06:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Both categories have the same scope and are basically titled the same. Gonnym (talk) 07:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Islamic studies scholars by nationality[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 July 12#Category:Islamic studies scholars by nationality

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_June_15&oldid=1073193019"