Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 5[edit]

Category:Parks and outdoor spaces in Dedham, Massachusetts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. plicit 01:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To match other similar categories. User:Namiba 19:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose As the creator I don't feel terribly strongly about this, but will point out that the category contains more than just parks. One article is about a tree, and the other about a canal. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 01:13, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Yuto Adachi[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 01:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary level of categorization for a single subcategory. WP:OCEPON. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Russian actors in gay pornographic films[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to both parents. plicit 01:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only has one person in this category. Merge with Category:Russian male pornographic film actors, the parent category which only has one person in (+ this subcat) before deleting. QueenofBithynia (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per Oculi. I took the liberty to add 1- and 2-article siblings to the nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Aircraft manufacturers of Austria-Hungary[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 13#Category:Aircraft manufacturers of Austria-Hungary

Ryerson University[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 13#Ryerson University

Category:Bibliographies of explorations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 01:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Cat had only one entry since 2011 about the Lewis and Clark expedition, mvd entry to Bibliographies of history cat. Now empty. Since it has only had one entry since 2011 it is unlikely to be needed.  // Timothy :: talk  10:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I know. I wish editors would just wait for CFDs to close before they take action. It nullifies the point of even having a discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Incan politicians[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 01:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The designation "Inca" doesn't really apply for most individuals listed as the Inca people haven't existed for centuries. The only actual Incans listed are Justo Sahuaraura Inca, Pachacuti, and one of the three Tupacs. For these, Category:Inca emperors already fits. Better to delete a recategorize. Perhaps Category:Aymara politicians, Category:Quechua politicians, etc., could be created instead. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 03:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom, anachronistic category that lumps all the Inca-descended ethnic groups into one. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 01:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.