Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 9[edit]

Category:Naval mutinies in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEF. I also believe it should be moved up a category and be a subcategory of Category:Mutinies instead. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 22:44, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Breton businesspeople[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Category:Breton businesspeople

Category:Soldiers in science fiction[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Category:Soldiers in science fiction

Category:Aerial warfare in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEF, to make it more definingly about aerial warfare. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 21:11, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Support Not more defining, but provides a clearer scope. Dimadick (talk) 06:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Invasions in fiction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEF, to make it more definingly about things that are specifically about invasions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 21:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Rename categories Category:Human rights abuses by period and Category:Crime in Australia by time[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:35, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Both these categories relate to the last three centuries, and renaming will integrate them into a series, rather than being “orphan” categories. Hugo999 (talk) 04:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Then "by period" would be the more appropriate parent. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:05, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Novels about war and conflict[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Category:Novels about war and conflict

Works by period[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename and merge, "by period" is the standard format of these types of categories (e.g. Category:Arts by period, Category:Literature by period, Category:Architecture by period) and there is no reason to have two of these categories. If this goes ahead, I presume that the "by date" and "by period of creation" subcategories can be speedily be renamed to "by period". Marcocapelle (talk) 13:54, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose it's works by date. The date category tree is by date. Periods are a subset of dates. The Baroque Period is a period, 1842 is a date, not a period. -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 14:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose To take a random example; "Piano concerti of the Classical period" and "Piano concerti of the Romantic period" (is that how the categories are named? do they even exist? whatever, the idea is the same no matter what the categories are) is a meaningfully separate way to distinguish these than "Piano concerti by date of composition" RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nomination. Category:Works by period of creation seems to have been created by user:Stefanomione to separate named-period categories from date-based categories. I find this separation unnecessary. That user has since been banned from category activity and much of his work has been reverted. – Fayenatic London 09:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I feel this distinction is entirely valid and should be retained, as per similar comments above on this item. --Sm8900 (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sure, but is a decade or a year a date or are they a period? I would say the latter. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose -- This is a container, where most of the content is "by date". Peterkingiron (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:French mission settlements in North America[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:43, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The current name gives the mistaken impression that is it meant to include missions started by French-Canadian and French-American priests after the fall of New France. The note on the category page makes it clear this category is for missions in New France only. A separate category will need to be create for "French missions" created after the fall of New France. --Kevlar (talkcontribs) 16:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Banks based in in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. The category.can be further discussed in another discussion. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: does not need double "in" - Arjayay (talk) 21:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Should be a simple fix. Jaburk1974 (talk) 15:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jaburk1974 (talk) 15:31, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but this can be speedied, surely? Johnbod (talk) 22:14, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support -- This ought to have been speedied. The category has 7 items which is enough to keep. Assuming that Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex is a genuine conurbation (I am the other side of the Atlantic), there is no reason why this should not be kept. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Breton women[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus (weak oppose). (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:48, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename, save one article (to be purged) these are women of the medieval Duchy of Brittany. After renaming the category can be reparented to Category:Medieval Breton people. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose renaming. The existing, broad category covers all Breton/ethnic Breton women, not just a certain specific time period. Scanlan (talk) 10:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:17th-century Breton people[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:50, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge overdue categories, the duchy of Brittany lost its independence halfway the 16th century, and rename or merge the parent category for less ambiguity. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:11, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Bretons are an ethnicity, and they still exist in the 21st century. Dimadick (talk) 06:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- Brittanny is an identifiable region of France, consisting the 3 departments since the Revolution. Each of these has at least 5 items, so that I see no need to change anything. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bishopric of Trent[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Category:Bishopric of Trent

Category:Bengali-language newspapers published in the United States[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:56, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One of several 1-page subcategories of the listed merge target; I will bulk nominate all of them if this one closes as merge. Should also be merged to Category:Bengali-language newspapers. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 20:30, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Debut live albums[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Category:Debut live albums

Category:Characters in animated series[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename to align with Category:Animated television characters by gender and Category:Animated television characters by series. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Swiss people by language[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Swiss people by language

Category:Toho Monsters[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Category:Toho Monsters

Category:Standardized tests for Physics[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Category:Standardized tests for Physics

Category:Hotels in Financial District, Boston[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Category:Hotels in Financial District, Boston

History of Porto-Novo[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#History of Porto-Novo

Category:Child murder during the Russian invasion of Ukraine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:09, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Russia has invaded Ukraine several times, this format follows similar categories such as Category:War crimes during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and the parent article is called 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Super Ψ Dro 11:19, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Football teams in Austria-Hungary[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Category:Football teams in Austria-Hungary

Category:Set families[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Category:Set families

Category:Islamic characters in comics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Muslim is prefered term ★Trekker (talk) 01:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, same as what we use for real people. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:44, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support To match the parent categories. Dimadick (talk) 06:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.