Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 February 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 13 February 15 >

February 14[edit]

Category:Sparkle GMA Artist Center[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. bibliomaniac15 03:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Moving to a full CfD after the below comments during the initial speedy C2D proposal. Needs to be renamed because the name "Sparkle" is called by reliable sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]; this would match the article following WP:COMMONNAME. With this variable, opening a full CfD for consensus. I agree with the proposal from Fayenatic london. Chompy Ace 21:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments at the speedy rename proposal:
*Note: this was previously deleted in 2008 as WP:PERFCAT. – Fayenatic London 10:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete again, still a case of WP:PERFCAT. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Split Majority of the actors under this category should be categorized under GMA Artist Center, not the current name Sparkle. A different category should have been created. When the bot moved the category, everyone got categorized under Category:Sparkle GMA Artist Center. which is very wrong, a lot of these people were signed to GMA Artist Center but only a few are currently signed under Sparkle. The old one should have been kept, like how the wiki has both Category:Sony BMG and Category:Sony Music. Carl Francis (talk) 18:06, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Marcocapelle. I assume that most members of this category would not belong in the parent Category:GMA Network personalities. – Fayenatic London 22:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:British Service Swords[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:British service swords. There is a clear consensus to change the current name, but a lack of clarity as to the target. No evidence has been provided to support a contention that "British Service Sword" is a proper name. BD2412 T 22:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This doesn't look like some sort of a proper name, so may follow suit for consistency per parent Category:Weapons of the United Kingdom and similar Category:Swords of the United States. Brandmeistertalk 10:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:C2C and capitals do not make much sense here. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename preferably to Category:British service swords. British is the appropriate denonym for UK. In UK English "military" means army and excludes the Royal Navy, but naval cutlasses are within the category scope. At Worst, Category:Service swords of the United Kingdom, but that would theoretically exclude pre-1801 content. A break at 1801 would not be sensible as the swords of military swords of regiments on the Irish establishment would (like other British ones) have been made in or near Birmingham. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:24, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose No quality improvement in the proposed renaming! If the existing wording should be improper indeed please name accountable reasons and make a better wording proposal. --Just N. (talk) 17:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please make a better worded oppose. Why do you think this is a proper name? Marcocapelle (talk) 08:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:SWAC Championship Game[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 18:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The SWAC fields 18 different sports. It presumably has championship games in just about all of those sports. This category, which is specific to the football championship game, needs to be renamed to reflect that. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 03:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_February_14&oldid=1078541221"