Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 July 16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 16[edit]

Category:Selknam (rugby union) players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. The category name should follow the article. (non-admin closure) JBchrch talk 20:36, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No other team with the same name, so the new category for the players would not be ambiguous. Coco (talk) 23:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Societates Europaeae[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:09, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete Previous consensus, most recently at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 March 6#Category:Naamloze_vennootschappen, is that the corporate from is WP:NOTDEFINING for companies, the same reason we do not have Category:Limited liability companies or similar. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:16, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:American monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Category:American monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests

Category:Shopping malls in Constanţa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Shopping malls in Constanța. qualifies as C2C speedy (non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Romanian does not use ţ, only ț. Super Ψ Dro 12:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films about emotions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category of unclear necessity, which isn't clearly differentiating its contents from other films in a defining way. Virtually all narrative fiction films (and even a significant percentage of documentaries) that exist at all are about people (or anthropomorphized animals) going through events or situations and having emotions about them -- meaning that the overwhelming majority of all films that exist at all are "about" emotions to some extent, and any "degree of aboutness" cutoff that attempted to determine whether or not any film is "about emotions" enough to warrant categorization here would be an arbitrary and subjective one. So this just isn't a useful category, because it doesn't clearly differentiate some films from other films.
I can defend the Category:Films about fear and Category:Films about grieving subcategories, both of which should be moved back to the Category:Films about mental states parent, but there's no point in categorizing films for being "about emotions" in general, because very few films aren't "about emotions" in some way. Bearcat (talk) 11:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Judeo-Tat theatre[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, the current content largely overlaps with Category:Judeo-Tat writers and it does not look like there are articles really about the theatre (apart from the eponymous article obviously). Marcocapelle (talk) 11:41, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:23, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • That was exactly the intention behind the nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Boxes12 (talk) 19:43, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @Boxes12, you should know that in these sorts of discussions !votes without any rationale are rarely taken into consideration by the closer. JBchrch talk 09:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to check whether there's consensus on Mvqr's proposition dated 11:47, 5 July 2022. Tagging Marcocapelle and Boxes12.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JBchrch talk 09:44, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Websites utilizing paywalls[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: While it might be nice to know, utilizing a paywall is not a defining characteristic of any of these websites (most of which are newspapers or magazines). There are thousands of academic journals also behind paywalls, and millions of free websites without paywalls. We don't (nor should we) categorize those as such. --Animalparty! (talk) 05:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTDEFINING, as the nominator points out. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:United States state Attorneys General navigational boxes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 14:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Conforms to MOS:JOBTITLES and matches similar categories (i.e. Category:State attorneys general in the United States and Category:State attorneys general in the United States by state. Woko Sapien (talk) 01:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per MOS:JOBTITLES or per 'United States state attorneys general' is not a job title. Oculi (talk) 12:27, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.