Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 July 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2[edit]

Category:Deniers of the Armenian genocide[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 2#Category:Deniers of the Armenian genocide

Category:Songs about boredom[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) JBchrch talk 14:44, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:SHAREDNAME, they are categorized by name related to boredom rather than whether they are actually about boredom. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 15:52, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, plus it is a trivial topic. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:08, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as too trivial (just songs with the word "bored" in their names). — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:27, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Songs about fear[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:SHAREDNAME, they are categorized by name related to fear rather than whether they are actually about fear. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 15:51, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lower Saxony Wikipedians[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 13:54, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge (or reverse merge), the two categories have the same purpose. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians interested in Lower Saxony[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:35, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, contains only one editor who appears to be interested in every country and every region in the world. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please, keep the facts. Should be: contains only one editor who appears to be interested in some country and some region in the world. Djmirko (talk) 07:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Buaidh's user page is in 507 (!) Wikipedians interested in ... categories. Most of them are places, so Marcocapelle's claim is a reasonable use of hyperbole. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WikiProject Lower Saxony members[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) JBchrch talk 14:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, defunct WikiProject. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as empty. Were this category populated, I would weakly support keeping it, as the WikiProject is only tagged as inactive, not defunct and wouldn't make very much sense to delete just this one absent a broader proposal to deleted all categories for inactive WikiProjects. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:46, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians in Helmstedt[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) JBchrch talk 09:29, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Too few people to support a location category, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 December 16#Category:Wikipedians in Mount Juliet, Tennessee * Pppery * it has begun... 13:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The amount of users expected to be able to join this category is simply too small to support collaboration, as per previous precedent established. VegaDark (talk) 19:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Defunct magazines published in the Soviet Union[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 2#Category:Defunct magazines published in the Soviet Union

Category:Manukau City Centre[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 2#Category:Manukau City Centre

Category:Society-related timelines by year[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary layer; the only sub-cat is already otherwise within the parent categories. – Fayenatic London 08:52, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Economic history of the Soviet Union[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 2#Category:Economic history of the Soviet Union

Category:Soviet national policy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:40, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename to a less ambiguous title. "National policy" can mean anything. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:21, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Aftermath of World War II in the Soviet Union and Russia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Aftermath of World War II in the Soviet Union. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename, it is strange to have "Russia" mentioned at the same level as "Soviet Union" in this period. At most a subCategory:Aftermath of World War II in Russia might be created but with the content of the category there seems no need for that. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Strange indeed. Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:55, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Since Russia was a subsection of the USSR at that point. - RevelationDirect (talk) 03:32, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, it certainly shouldn't be "and Russian". It could be split up further to Russian SFSR, Ukrainian SSR, Belarus SSR, and so on, but it does not appear to be split and contains all Soviet regions not just the Russian part.--Mvqr (talk) 10:42, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hospitals in the Soviet Union[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:40, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename like others within Category:Buildings and structures built in the Soviet Union, and revise the "explanatory" text accordingly. From the Soviet category, remove City hospital No. 40 (opened 1740), Bērnu Klīniskā Universitātes Slimnīca (1899), Lesnoye Sanatorium and Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital (both opened in 1910). – Fayenatic London 06:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Psychiatric hospitals in the Soviet Union and Russia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Psychiatric hospitals in Russia. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 06:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Distinguish current from former country. Where appropriate, the member articles are already in Category:Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union and Category:Hospitals in the Soviet Union. – Fayenatic London 06:03, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:05, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Category names should not be formulated to equate these two states, and privilege just one of the USSR’s fifteen successor states.  —Michael Z. 03:31, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. It could be further split up by Soviet states, but it shouldn't be "and Russia".--Mvqr (talk) 10:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2020s timelines of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The parent category has just 20+ pages. A recently-created separate category for one decade with only ten potential pages (currently, three) is uncalled for. Unnecessary categories make navigation more confusing. Triggerhippie4 (talk) 00:16, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Breaking Bad songs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 19:35, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: None of these songs are original to the TV series, thus none are defined by their use in these shows. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Odebrecht[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The Odebrecht Group was renamed to Novonor. 2016Começa (talk) 22:34, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: main article move was reverted by Mathglot, on the grounds that Odebrecht remains the common name, see Talk:Odebrecht#Novonor. – Fayenatic London 19:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose There's been 1 unsuccessful RM to rename the main article at Talk:Odebrecht, another RM whose outcome is unclear, and a third informal conversation on a rename. No opinion on that controversy, but it needs to be resolved by consensus in the article space (probably with a third RM instead of bold moves and unmoves) and then these categories can be be speedily renamed to match. - RevelationDirect (talk) 02:25, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.