Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< June 10 June 12 >

June 11[edit]

Category:Classical antiquity in modern art and culture[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. A discussion about a possible renaming did not yield a clear consensus. Editors are welcome to flesh it out in a new CFD. (non-admin closure) JBchrch talk 14:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unclear/confusing scope. There is no article defining the concept (main/parent article). We don't have category trees for "in modern art and culture", nor "in art and culture". This is a subcat to Category:Topics in culture and Category:Topics in the arts, as far as I can tell, the only such category merging parent cats into one. It has spawned three children: Category:Ancient Greece in art and culture, Category:Hellenistic period in modern art and culture, Category:Roman Empire in art and culture, the latter with Category:Ancient Rome in art and culture. I suggest deleting it as well as the four named child categories as the simplest solution, I don't think there'll be any information loss. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 22:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Rename - seems like the best consensus per the arguments above. - GizzyCatBella🍁 19:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment (voted above). I have no strong view on the article name, and would not stand out against a consensus as to the target. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:31, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I agree with Randy Kryn. This is one of our better category trees. This is the actual impact of antiquity in subsequent centuries. Dimadick (talk) 13:31, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Municipalities in Italy by region[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 July 29#Municipalities in Italy by region

Computer criminals[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge all. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:42, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, underdeveloped tree with 1-3 articles in each of these country categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Free bioimaging software[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wonderworkers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Miracle workers. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Umm, I'm not sure quite what process led this category to this point, but the WP:COMMONNAME for someone who performs miracles is just "miracle worker" - and this is the case by a considerable margin: a fact which a simple Ngrams search makes really quite evident. 'Wonderworkers' is archaic, odd English and not the typical way anyone would ever refer to this grouping. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, as the proposed name will be more easily understood. – Fayenatic London 09:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Stations of Dhaka Metro by area[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. ✗plicit 13:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary layer, containing only one sub-cat and with no other parents. Note: target has been nominated for speedy renaming to Category:Dhaka Metro stations. – Fayenatic London 09:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It is not unnecessary. The category is for stations by area. People will understand which stations situated in the area. Mehedi Abedin 13:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_11&oldid=1109731517"