Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 March 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 1[edit]

Category:Fictional myrmecologists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not really a popular theme in fiction. Besides Ant-Man, it only contains a film, which doesn't even belong in a category for characters. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 21:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - as per above, not really sure why this was ever split. (Oinkers42) (talk) 21:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - as per above. If there is some big uptick in ant scientists in the future, it can always be separated again. --awkwafaba (📥) 12:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Amarna letters with photos, Obverse or Reverse[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 13:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: If this is a useful maintenance category, the capitalisation should be fixed. However, this seems to be an unusual kind of categorisation. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
22:41, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This seems like something that should be being kept track of through commons rather than 'pedia (although come to think of it I'm not entirely sure how commons does track 'images needed'). Furius (talk) 21:48, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • If kept it should become a hidden maintenance category. But I agree with nom, it is an unusual category. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Adding a delete vote after nobody else provides good reasons to keep the category. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:North American Football League players[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 March 21#Category:North American Football League players

Category:Milwaukee City Council members[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. plicit 13:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: It's not called the Milwaukee City Council, it's the Milwaukee Common Council. There are 49 people in this category. Orange Mike | Talk 00:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy rename: I started the category in 2016 and support a speedy renaming for accuracy's sake.--User:Namiba 15:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.