Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 13

< May 12	May 14 >

May 13[edit]

Category:Investigations[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 3#Category:Investigations

Category:Ottoman historians[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename all. – Fayenatic London 08:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Ottoman historians to Category:Historians from the Ottoman Empire
Propose renaming Category:15th-century historians of the Ottoman Empire to Category:15th-century historians from the Ottoman Empire
Propose renaming Category:16th-century historians of the Ottoman Empire to Category:16th-century historians from the Ottoman Empire
Propose renaming Category:17th-century historians of the Ottoman Empire to Category:17th-century historians from the Ottoman Empire
Propose renaming Category:18th-century historians of the Ottoman Empire to Category:18th-century historians from the Ottoman Empire
Propose renaming Category:19th-century historians of the Ottoman Empire to Category:19th-century historians from the Ottoman Empire
Propose renaming Category:Archaeologists of the Ottoman Empire to Category:Archaeologists from the Ottoman Empire

Nominator's rationale: rename to avoid the misunderstanding that these might be historians of the Ottoman dynasty which is not the case (for the top category) and to avoid the misunderstanding that the subject of these historians might be the Ottoman Empire which is not the case either (for all these categories). Marcocapelle (talk) 20:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

copy of speedy discussions

Category:19th-century historians of the Ottoman Empire to Category:19th-century Ottoman historians – C2B. Rathfelder (talk) 12:58, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:18th-century historians of the Ottoman Empire to Category:18th-century Ottoman historians – C2B. Rathfelder (talk) 12:58, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:17th-century historians of the Ottoman Empire to Category:17th-century Ottoman historians – C2B. Rathfelder (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:16th-century historians of the Ottoman Empire to Category:16th-century Ottoman historians – C2B. Rathfelder (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:15th-century historians of the Ottoman Empire to Category:15th-century Ottoman historians – C2B. Rathfelder (talk) 12:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What established naming convention are you citing? If Category:Ottoman historians is the one, then I don't think a category you created a few days ago which itself seems out of place, works here (seeing as how its parent is Category:Writers of the Ottoman Empire). Gonnym (talk) 15:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Category:19th-century historians by nationality and the like all just use the adjective, except for Georgia and the Holy Roman Empire‎. Rathfelder (talk) 22:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - See also Oculi's comment further down (favouring "from"). Marcocapelle (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  That refers to the Russian Empire where the adjective is ambiguous. Rathfelder (talk) 22:33, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Oppose - but it should be 'from the Ottoman Empire' per many precedents for several occupations. Oculi (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
'rename instead to Category:19th-century historians from the Ottoman Empire etc.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Archaeologists of the Ottoman Empire to Category:Ottoman archaeologists – C2C: To match Category:Archaeologists by nationality and make it clear this is their nationality, not their field of operations. Rathfelder (talk) 12:53, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - the cfd quoted below removed all uses of 'Ottoman' (is it a nationality?) in favour of 'of the Ottoman Empire' (or 'from' in a few cases). Oculi (talk) 00:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "Ottoman" has a very specific meaning, and does not easily or always mean residents/subjects of the Ottoman Empire. Much better would be Category:Archaeologists from the Ottoman Empire. This whole tree needs some work.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ottoman historians to Category:Historians of the Ottoman Empire – C2C. Rathfelder (talk) 22:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, this one should be "from" because "of" may imply the Ottoman Empire is the subject of these historians rather than their citizenship. Marcocapelle (talk) 00:28, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Its not obvious how to distinguish these, but perhaps it would be better to leave it as Category:Ottoman historians? Rathfelder (talk) 12:04, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- That is also a possibility. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:19, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw this. Rathfelder (talk) 12:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is better to change it to Category:Historians from the Ottoman Empire (cf Category:Historians from the Russian Empire). Oculi (talk) 13:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The proposed form would make it seem this is what they studied. Much better to use Historians from the Ottoman Empire.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support all these. Rathfelder (talk) 20:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Oculi and Johnpacklambert: pinging other contributors to speedy discussions. Rathfelder reacted quicker than I could ping them. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ottoman refers to the dynasty not and is not a nationality. There is no satisfactory demonym, so that this rename is necessary. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support all these. Oculi (talk) 10:29, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Comic strips by genre[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Comic strips by genre (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: This is unnecessary as it contains just small subcategories that just duplicate those for Category:Comics by genre.. All comic strips are comics and can be covered in Category:Comics by genre. The only thing unique to comic strips is Category:Gag-a-day comics which can be retained, everything should be deleted and upmerged (ex. Category:Adult comic strips to Category:Adult comics, Category:Detective comic strips to Category:Detective comics, etc.). The only other exception is the Category:Political comic strips which I proposed for renaming, as Category:Political comics doesn't exist yet (so it contains both comics and comic strips). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:25, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think comic strips should be kept separate from comic books. Comic strips are short, appear in newspapers, tend to be focused on humour, have a longer history. Comics books by contrast have longer stories that can be complete within one issue, have credited writers/plotters/scripters, pencillers, inkers, colorists, an extensive fandom with wikis, are sold separately. The two media are distinct. Dongord (talk) 12:10, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dongord Note the proposal does not suggest deleting neither the article about comic strips, nor its main category. I am just proposing that we don't need to have separate 'by genre' categories for regular comics and comic strips. A detective comic strip can be in category for comic strips, and detective comics. As their contents show, people often confuse comics with comic strips, and so comics are often improperly categorized as comic strips. See also discussion below. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comic books are large and long often in colour, and sold through comic book stores. Comic strips are short, often in black and white, and usually found inside other publications.Dongord (talk) 09:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And manga is a Japanese term for Japanese-style comics. Let's try to stay on topic, ok? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 16:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for now, this is a container category which means there is no point in deletion if not the subcategories are dissolved too. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Super ninja2 accounts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: soft delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Super ninja2 accounts (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Inappropriate personal userspace category * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:34, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 15:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Animated Flash (comics) films[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 4#Category:Animated Flash (comics) films

Category:Unofficial Shazam films[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Unofficial Shazam films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Smallcat. ★Trekker (talk) 16:32, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 15:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Per nom. Only a single entry, and that entry's connection to the subject is very loose and non-defining. Ding Chavez (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Film series based on Valiant Comics[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 3#Category:Film series based on Valiant Comics

Category:Rules of National Basketball Association[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 21:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Rules of National Basketball Association to Category:Rules of the National Basketball Association

Nominator's rationale: I believe this proposal should be uncontroversial. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 20:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 15:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and grammar rules.Abcmaxx (talk) 10:01, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Political party youth groups in Northern Ireland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 21:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Political party youth groups in Northern Ireland to Category:Youth wings of political parties in Northern Ireland

Nominator's rationale: To bring in line with the current consensus and the categories for other countries (e.g. Scotland) Abcmaxx (talk) 22:29, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 15:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy rename per WP:C2C. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lebanese people by period[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Lebanese people by period to Category:Lebanese people

Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary intermediate category. Category:Lebanese people by century is the only content. Rathfelder (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.Abcmaxx (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

People by populated place in Italy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. I don't see a consensus to merge/delete/otherwise remove these categories, as a group. Per Pizza's suggestion, no prejudice against individual renomination of cats that are still, post-expansion, believed to be underpopulated. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:35, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging:

more categories nominated

Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, these categories consist of only 1-3 articles. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 10:36, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. @MrKeefeJohn: A mere strong oppose without explaining why will be assigned no weight here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pppery: mass deletion to get make more busy the superior categories, loosing connection with Commons and other wiki? For me completely absurd. Anyway... P.S. now Category:People from Fiumicino has 4 element. Still delete? MrKeefeJohn (talk) 19:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - With very few exceptions, the above categories do not exist on Commons either. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:30, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    - I wrote "Commons and other wiki", not only Commons, and I meant "other wikies". Anyway "few" is not a parameter, but an opinion ;-). For example how many interwiki should be? Who decides it? For example Category:People from Giaveno has 3 elements and it,fr and Commons. Better to classificate togheter in Category:People_from_the_Province_of_Turin with other 64 elements? Quote at 100% @Abcmaxx:? Which is the real motivation to delete these categories? Are they really unuseful or dangerous for wiki or they just don't "fit" current rules? MrKeefeJohn (talk) 12:31, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Carignano now has got 5 element. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 19:47, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, I will remove these two. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Being from a province is not the same as being from a small town and such a mass merge will create more problems in the future than it solves, there has already been several that actually do not fit the small category criteria but have been lumped in here.Abcmaxx (talk) 09:57, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Which problems would it cause? Which categories do not fit here? Marcocapelle (talk) 13:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - I read again Wikipedia:Overcategorization#Small_with_no_potential_for_growth and already from the title is clear, I mean no potential for growth. Among the categories proposed for the deletetion, there are some of them about cities with a big potential for growth. For example Category:People from Acquapendente‎ has 3 elements while it:Categoria:Nati_ad_Acquapendente has 12 elements. The same for Category:People from Cannobio has 3 elements it:Categoria:Nati a Cannobio, and so on.
I'm adding only articles about people born in the place the category is about it.
Category:People from Ala, Trentino now has got 4 elements
Category:People from Canicattì now has got 4 elements
Category:People from Deruta now has got 4 elements
Category:People from Castel Gandolfo now has got 5 elements
Category:People from Cairo Montenotte now has got 5 elements
Category:People from Pitigliano now has got 7 elements
Category:People from Schio now has got 40 (forty!!!!) elements. After this one I stop my search and, to be honest, I have some big doubts about the opening of this mass request of categories's deletion... Could you, @Marcocapelle:, please explain me better? I can not understand . MrKeefeJohn (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The request is not about deleting, it is about merging, that is a big difference. As long as there little content at town level, the biographies can still be found at province level, so no information gets lost. If more content appears, categories can always be reestablished. I will remove the above categories that you indicated from the nomination. With respect to Category:People from Schio I am confused, it does not make much sense that this category was so severely underpopulated. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I should add that we do not categorize people by place of birth alone. Per WP:COPPLACE: the place of birth, although it may be significant from the perspective of local studies, is rarely defining from the perspective of an individual. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:49, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Ovada now has got 6 elements. Thank you @Marcocapelle: for your answer, I'll reply later.
Category:People from Favara, Sicily now has got 5 elements.
Category:People from Bertinoro now has got 6 elements. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, I removed these too. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:32, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Basiliano now has got 4 elements.
Category:People from Castel Goffredo now has got 4 elements and probably a big "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone_legate_a_Castel_Goffredo
Category:People from Comacchio now has got 5 elements and probably a big "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone_legate_a_Comacchio MrKeefeJohn (talk) 12:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you again, I have removed these too. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Darfo Boario Terme now has got 6 elements and probably a big "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone_legate_a_Darfo Boario Terme
Category:People from Demonte now has got 5 elements
Category:People from Corciano now has got 4 elements
Category:People from Fossacesia now has got 4 elements MrKeefeJohn (talk) 08:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again, I removed these from the nomination as well. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome ;-)

Category:People from Giugliano in Campania now has got 6 elements and probably a big "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone_legate_a_Giugliano in Campania MrKeefeJohn (talk) 18:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also removed. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer, please leave the discussion open for a few weeks to give User:MrKeefeJohn ample opportunity to populate the nominated categories where possible. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Impruneta now has got 4 elements and probably a big "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone_legate_a_Impruneta MrKeefeJohn (talk) 12:59, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Lissone now has got 4 elements and probably a big "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone_legate_a_Lissone MrKeefeJohn (talk) 10:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Maglie now has got 5 elements and probably a big "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone_legate_a_Maglie MrKeefeJohn (talk) 07:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Mariano del Friuli now has got 4 elements MrKeefeJohn (talk) 06:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Marigliano now has got 5 elements and probably a big "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Nati a Marigliano MrKeefeJohn (talk) 07:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Massafra now has got 5 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a Massafra MrKeefeJohn (talk) 07:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Mineo now has got 4 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a Mineo
Category:People from Monte San Savino now has got 10 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a Monte San Savino--MrKeefeJohn (talk) 16:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @MrKeefeJohn, feel free to just remove >3 categories from the nomination. ― Qwerfjkl talk 21:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Also, for what it's worth, I remember a tool (I think QuickCategories) for adding pages to categories based on other wikis, using WikiData. ― Qwerfjkl talk 22:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    - @QwerfjklThank you for your suggestions. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 10:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Montemurlo now has got 4 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a Montemurlo--MrKeefeJohn (talk) 10:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)]][reply]
Category:People from Pieve di Soligo now has got 7 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Nati a Pieve di Soligo MrKeefeJohn (talk) 13:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Portico e San Benedetto now has got 4 elements. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 14:48, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Quarrata now has got 5 elements. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Ribera, Agrigento now has got 6 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a Ribera MrKeefeJohn (talk) 12:10, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Riesi now has got 4 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a Riesi--MrKeefeJohn (talk) 12:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Riposto now has got 4 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a Riposto MrKeefeJohn (talk) 12:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Roncade now has got 4 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a Roncade MrKeefeJohn (talk) 20:47, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Sabbioneta now has got 5 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a Sabbioneta
Category:People from San Canzian d'Isonzo now has got 4 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a San Canzian d'Isonzo MrKeefeJohn (talk) 07:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from San Casciano in Val di Pesa now has got 4 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a San Casciano in Val di Pesa MrKeefeJohn (talk) 12:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from San Fratello now has got 4 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a San Fratello MrKeefeJohn (talk) 06:40, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Sauze d'Oulx now has got 4 elements. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 19:31, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again, I removed these from the nomination as well. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:21, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- You're welcome!

Category:People from Scilla, Calabria now has got 4 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Speciale:PuntanoQui/Categoria:Nati_a_Scilla_(Italia) MrKeefeJohn (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep per WP:TRAINWRECK. Several categories have now been populated. Instead, I'd recommend closing this and relisting individually the ones that are still underpopulated. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:30, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Siculiana now has got 6 elements and probably a "potential" to have more of them it:Categoria:Persone legate a Siculiana MrKeefeJohn (talk) 13:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:People from Caccamo now has got 4 elements MrKeefeJohn (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Classical music instruments[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 21:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Classical music instruments to Category:Orchestral instruments

Nominator's rationale: I don't understand why this and Category:Orchestral instruments both exist since they will largely be the same. Since other specific categories cover other facets of Western classical music, such as Category:Baroque instruments, this category serves little purpose. Why? I Ask (talk) 08:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Canaan: Extra Biblical references[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Extra-biblical references to Canaan. No user expressed a preference for the other. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 22:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Canaan: Extra Biblical references to Category:Extra-biblical references of Canaan

Nominator's rationale: rename, better grammar. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Abcmaxx (talk) 10:03, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Prefer Category:Extra-biblical references to Canaan, but rename somehow. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- (as nom) "to" instead of "of" is perfectly fine too. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, ok with to as well.--Mvqr (talk) 10:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Infinite[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 4#Infinite