Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 25

< May 24	May 26 >

May 25[edit]

Category:18th-century Belgian scientists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: redirect to Category:Scientists of the Austrian Netherlands. – Fayenatic London 21:04, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:18th-century Belgian scientists to Category:Scientists of the Austrian Netherlands

Nominator's rationale: Belgium did not exist until 1825 Rathfelder (talk) 16:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support in principle per nom but simply delete because the one article is about a 19th-century scientist. Besides Belgium became independent only in 1830. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Rathfelder seems to have an obsession with nationalities and identities Marcelus (talk) 07:36, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We have previously agreed to deal with Belgian categories like this. I think for each country we should try to be consistent. But clearly each country needs to be dealt with differently. Rathfelder (talk) 07:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So why did you not revert your changes regarding Polish categories? Marcelus (talk) 08:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also Rathfelder if you are discussing such changes inform Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Belgium Marcelus (talk) 09:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The treatment of historical Belgium was agreed in May 2021. Please have a look at Category:People of the Habsburg Netherlands and Category:People of the Austrian Netherlands. Rathfelder (talk) 09:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rathfelder Why Austrian Netherlands and not Duchy of Brabant or Habsburg Monarchy? And why Austrian Netherlands encompass entire 18th century if it existed only in years 1714-1797? Why Category:18th-century Luxembourgian people is separate if Duchy of Luxembourg was part of Austrian Netherlands?Marcelus (talk) 09:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome to propose improvements. Categorisation is a method of successive approximation. So Category:18th-century Luxembourgian people maybe should be a subcategory of Category:People of the Austrian Netherlands. Rathfelder (talk) 10:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I have added Category:People of the Austrian Netherlands as a parent category of Category:18th-century Luxembourgian people. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose There is the Category:Belgian people (before 1830). Seems as though it is valid to use the adjective Belgian before Belgium was a state. After all, the word Belgian did not appear in a vacuum.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't any article directly in Category:Belgian people (before 1830), nor should there be. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: I have removed the only article because it is about a 19th-century scientist. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, Marcocapelle, and you answered me a day before I came to announce that the category has been emptied. I am typically strongly against doing this before a CFD discussion closure (and especially when an editor nominates categories at CFD and at the same time empties them! Nuts!) but in this case, it makes the closure more simple. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 21:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Category:Scientists of the Austrian Netherlands which covers the same. Belgium did not exist. May be worthwhile to think of the consistency of Category:Scientists of the Habsburg Netherlands.--Mvqr (talk) 10:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per C1 as empty (no opinion on a redirect). ― Qwerfjkl talk 13:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:World Baseball Softball Confederation events[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 3#Category:World Baseball Softball Confederation events

Category:Governing bodies of baseball[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Governing bodies of baseball to Category:Baseball governing bodies

Nominator's rationale: Match naming convention of other sport categories. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'Rename per WP:C2C. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Azerbaijani descent[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 12#Azerbaijani descent

Category:Glock pistols[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Glock pistols (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Useless category. Only two articles categories here (one of which is the article about Glock pistols itself) and I don't think the book is sufficiently important to warrant the creation of this category. Elshad (talk) 15:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, the category scope might be expanded and the category renamed to Category:Glock, in that case we can have four articles (see the "See also" section in Glock). I am not opposing the nomination, one might also argue that this "See also" section suffices. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support; "see also" links suffice for navigation between these articles. – Fayenatic London 12:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Podcast miniseries[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 12#Category:Podcast miniseries

Wikipedians by music[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 12:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Wikipedians who use QQ Music (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Wikipedians who use NetEase Cloud Music (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale Per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/User/Archive/June 2007#Category:Wikipedians who use iTunes/Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/User/Archive/February 2008#Category:Wikipedians who use Netflix, this type of category has no collaborative value. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 13:11, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians who oppose Taiwan independence[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Wikipedians who oppose Taiwan independence (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Inappropriate advocacy user category * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 13:11, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not to brag about it, but it is beyond the scope of Wikipedia to advocate your ideology. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unlikely to aid WP cooperation, which is the purpose of user catgories. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Altaic multilingual support templates[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 3#Category:Altaic multilingual support templates

Category:Railway stations in Khabarovsk[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 13:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Railway stations in Khabarovsk to Category:Railway stations in Khabarovsk Krai and Category:Khabarovsk

Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, currently only one article in the category. I am not entirely sure but I believe this is the only existing railway station in Khabarovsk. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. – Fayenatic London 12:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.