Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 16[edit]

Category:Fictional extraterrestrial royalty[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:41, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete per WP:NARROWCAT. Too narrow an intersection between ET's and royalty for a category to be needed. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 15:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - surely fictional extraterrestrial royalty is not limited to emperors and princesses. In any case the nom should be 'upmerge to all parents', not delete. Oculi (talk) 10:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I see no relevance of OVERCAT here, and Oculi has already pointed to scope for expansion. Dimadick (talk) 14:03, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dhatki people[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Category:Dhatki people

Frogs and toads in culture[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (option B). (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:44, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To match some other existing categories in the surrounding hierarchies. The last four were tagged by user:Ali17082001 in August without starting a discussion. – Fayenatic London 21:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, instead we might rename the surrounding "frogs and toads" categories to just "frogs". At least there should be some consistency. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Toad is just a common name used for various families of frogs, based on a perceived similarity in their appearance. They are not a distinct taxonomic group. Dimadick (talk) 13:58, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, here's Option B:
Fayenatic London 22:08, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support option B, the usage of "toads" in the category name is redundant. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Professors by rank of the Academy of Arts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Imperial Academy of Arts academic personnel. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:47, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category relates to the Imperial Academy of Arts. I cant see what "by rank" signifies, but perhaps I'm missing something. Rathfelder (talk) 21:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Alawite communities in Syria[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Category:Alawite communities in Syria

Category:Categories by raion of Ukraine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:48, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer, most categories by raion have been upmerged in previous CfD discussions. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:59, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Privybst (talk) 16:37, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Rococo architecture by country[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:49, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: All other styles by country use "in". – Fayenatic London 13:51, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Province of Saxony[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Category:Province of Saxony

African-American businesspeople[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#African-American businesspeople

Category:Moldovan National Division seasons[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2D. The league has been renamed. Sørhaug (talk) 10:30, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 14:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom - but why is not at WP:CFDS? GiantSnowman 14:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @GiantSnowman That's where I tried to put them, but apparently I chose the wrong option in Twinkle. Sørhaug (talk) 11:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I think Twinkle doesn't work for speedy category renames. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy rename per nom, C2D. As this was intended for the speedy section, this could be done immediately (as it's been more than 48 since proposed, and no objections). Joseph2302 (talk) 08:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Moldovan National Division players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2D. The league has been renamed. Sørhaug (talk) 10:28, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Moldovan National Division managers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2D. The league has been renamed. Sørhaug (talk) 10:28, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Moldovan National Division[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: C2D. The league has been renamed. Sørhaug (talk) 10:27, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1911 establishments in Lebanon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, Lebanon did not exist yet before 1920 and we do not have a category tree by year for Lebanon before 1920. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:37, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, correct action. --Egeymi (talk) 09:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:NASCAR races at Dover International Speedway[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:52, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Track has not used the name "Dover International Speedway" in almost a year; has renamed to Dover Motor Speedway since being purchased by Speedway Motorsports, Inc. Nascar9919 (talk) 05:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Architecture by country[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Architecture by country

Small architecture categories[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: soft delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:56, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting:
50 more categories
Nominator's rationale: these each contain only a "Buildings and structures" sub-category. Those are already contained within Category:Architecture by country via Category:Buildings and structures by country. WP:SOFTDELETE until there is at least one more thing to put in them, e.g. an article on Architecture in Foo, or a sub-cat of Fooian architects. If not deleted, rename using "in" as above. – Fayenatic London 10:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support soft deletion, for now it is a redundant category layer. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:00, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support other than Czechoslovakia, which has architects. The others do not: see User:Oculi/sandbox3. Oculi (talk) 17:59, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.