Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 2 September 4 >

September 3[edit]

Category:People by raion in Ukraine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 12:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant layer with only one subcategory. Except in Crimea, Ukrainian people are diffused by first-level administrative divisions (oblasts). Marcocapelle (talk) 16:37, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Songs in memory of[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 12:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per precedent in this earlier discussion and this earlier discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Years in Tunisia[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 11#Years in Tunisia

"Bus accidents" to "Bus incidents"[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 12:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominator's rationale: There was a discussion on 6 March 2016 to rename many traffic accident categories to use the "incidents" label, but as can be seen there remain many that use the "accident" label. Possibly C2C-able but would rather make sure it gets consensus since category root uses 'accidents' terminology. DatGuyTalkContribs 13:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support incident is better than accident, what with non-accidents and crimes -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Alumni of the University of Malta[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 11#Category:Alumni of the University of Malta

Category:Province of Brandenburg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: purge. I'll also list category pages on the talk page per Marcocapelle. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 12:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: purge populated places, this is a history category about a former province, it should not contain current places. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:47, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Listify?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 10:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I am not too sure about list requirements in general, but I doubt this would even qualify for a list. Suggestion: list all current category members on the talk page of this discussion page and leave it to anyone to boldly create a list article with the risk that it gets AfD'd right away. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Moorish[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 11#Moorish

Category:Mauritanian Moors[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 11#Category:Mauritanian Moors

Category:Preteen pregnancy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Precocious puberty and pregnancy. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Discussion at Talk:Teenage pregnancy supports having information about preteen pregnancies on the page even though it is titled after teenagers. WashyGenius (talk) 06:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply: @Fayenatic london: I do not agree with this. Puberty in preteens (10-12) is not considered precocious puberty, but normally occurring puberty. Now for the pregnancy being precocious, yes it is, but it's not the same as a girl with precocious puberty (e.g. a 6-year-old) getting pregnant. WashyGenius (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians in the AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: It's more faithful to the ridiculousness of meta:Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists page. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:13, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the point of the bizarre acronym is so that people will want to find out what it stands for, so I would lean towards not renaming, but have no firm opinion here. Aza24 (talk) 03:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do not rename, it would be a way too long name. I would not oppose deletion though. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as joke/nonsense user category. If kept I prefer the longer name, as it's very unusual for a category name to be less detailed than the page it is named after. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:48, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- A pointless user category. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:53, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Does nothing to promote user collaboration. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It does no harm! Oppose rename. It's used on 489 User pages. I also suspect if it is deleted, it'll just keep being recreated as a red link category that the page will end up being protected. Liz Read! Talk! 06:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    So we should stop trying to enforce the rules because some people are willing to go out of their way to subvert them? That makes absolutely zero sense. Not to mention the category is largely template-populated anyway so the number of users in the category is a red herring. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:38, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_3&oldid=1109782353"