Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< October 4
October 6 >

October 5[edit]

Category:People from the Free and Hanseatic City of Bremen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/rename as nom suggested. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 00:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 2 categories created at 3 weeks of distance with seemingly identical scope. Free Hanseatic City of Bremen and Free and Hanseatic City of Bremen both redirect to Bremen (state), which states that it is called "officially the Free Hanseatic City of Bremen (German: Freie Hansestadt Bremen)." Place Clichy (talk) 23:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Physicians from the Kingdom of Prussia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 00:16, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Was emptied out of process, should be merged to the less specific category Mason (talk) 23:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Right-wing politicians in Israel[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (Subcat moved to Category:Israeli people by political orientation) (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overcategorization, should be upmerged, as there is only one child category (Far-right politicians in Israel) Mason (talk) 03:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose deletion, upmerge to Category:Israeli people by political orientation instead. No reason to remove this eligible parent category. Place Clichy (talk) 11:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge per Place Clichy, we apparently do not have right wing politicians categories in Wikipedia. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: I've populated it now, so the deletion premise is moot. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:08, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. If kept, it should be renamed to "Israeli right-wing politicians" as the standard to denote nationality is to use "FOOian" or "from FOO" Mason (talk) 03:13, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, but since the merge target is a container category, the articles should be purged as well. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge whole category or just the subcat?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People executed by the Holy Roman Empire[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 17#Category:People executed by the Holy Roman Empire

Category:Vice-chancellors of the University of Eswatini[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 17#Category:Vice-chancellors of the University of Eswatini

Category:Ethnic Meos[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Meo people. Some people supported deletion, but there wasn't enough to establish consensus. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: As per naming scheme in Category:Ethnic groups in India Gjs238 (talk) 17:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, hardly any article mentions ethnicity. Some articles may be moved to the category discussed below. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Meo is an ethnic group refering to Muslim's belonging to villages from the region, hence it is plausable for the category to be named "Meo people". In terms of the standard Indian language, the correct and more appropriate title is"Mewati people". Ah507 (talk) 03:53, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • This explanation does not resolve the lack of definingness. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:39, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename to Category:Meo people. In the spirit of consensus, also support Delete outcome per Marcocapelle as second-best option. In India, caste is often defining for many individuals, especially in a historical context. Article Zakir Hussain (Haryana politician), for instance, consistently links this identification with events in Hussain's biography: He was the first college graduate in the Meo (Muslim) Community... He was responsible for the Meo Community's decision to stay in India at the behest of Mahatma Gandhi [...] instead of going to Pakistan... He was the Chaudhary (Social Head) of Meo (Muslim) Community... So that would certainly be defining for this article, one of the few I looked up. Other articles mention a link to the Political families of Haryana#Shri Rahim Khan Clan of Mewat (presented as "the most prominent out of all of the Meo Muslim Clans of Mewat") but that's not entirely defining in the ethnic sense. So in any case if kept, the category may need to be purged of articles not eligible per WP:EGRS. Place Clichy (talk) 15:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I think you are unaware of the socio-religious context of the ethnic term "Meo". Meo's are the people who lived under the Khanzada Rulers of Mewat. The term Meo is region specific and religion specific as well. Meo's are considered an ethnicity under the Other Backward Class scheme of the Government of India. (refer to BLOCK B, Number 5), which refers to socially backwards or disadvangated castes (ethnic groups) . In order to be a Meo, one needs to belong to the region and needs to be a Muslim as well, there are no Hindu Ethnic Meos. In the article Zakir Hussain (Haryana politician), the term Meo community is refering to Meos as an ethnic group. In the second article you referenced, Political families of Haryana#Shri Rahim Khan Clan of Mewat, the term "Muslim" is being used as discretional specificity because it is already known that ethnic Meo's are Muslim. Meos are legally recognized as an ethnic group or caste under the schemes of the Indian Government. Ah507 (talk) 10:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Here is another list (refer to Entry No. 67) released by the Government of India referring to Meos as part of the Other Backwards Class scheme. Based on this it would be appropriate to change the name to Category:Meo people. For further clarity:
    - Mewat is a historical region.
    - Meos are an ethnic group or caste that is region specific (to Mewat) and religion specific (to Islam).
    - When the term "Muslim" is attached to the term "Meo", it is done discretionally.
    - Not every inhabitant of the Mewat region is necessarily a Meo. Ah507 (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Also one more thing I want to make clear is that not every Muslim from the region of Mewat is necessarily a Meo. The ethnicity has already been compounded from the previous castes and clans the poeple of this region belonged to, hence, it is impossible for someone from the region who originally belonged to another caste to adopt Islam and then be called a Meo. In short, Meos are indeed a recognized ethnic group and their ethnicity has already been established. Ah507 (talk) 10:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(answered after relisting) Based on these explanations, I still think that renaming to Category:Meo people is the best solution, unless there is a grammatical issue I did not see. I don't think I ever argued that there existed Hindu Meos. Place Clichy (talk) 21:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as per Place Clichy. When I originally proposed the merge to "Mewat people" I was considering "Mewat" an ethnicity. Now that we are considering Mewat as an historical region and "Meo" as an ethnicity, renaming the category Meo people seems logical and in accordance with the scheme used in Category:Ethnic groups in India.
Gjs238 (talk) 20:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rasborinae stubs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:05, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Empty stub category/template. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2023/September for more information. Andumé (talk) 19:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rasborinae-stub[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Empty stub category/template. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2023/September for more information. Andumé (talk) 19:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Television series by Seven.One Studios[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 15#Category:Television series by Seven.One Studios

Category:Military doctors by country[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 17#Category:Military doctors by country

Category:Jews in Ottoman Palestine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename all as proposed (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 00:17, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I think that this category is supposed to be a nationality category Mason (talk) 21:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Emigrants from the Kingdom of Bavaria to the United Kingdom[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 13#Category:Emigrants from the Kingdom of Bavaria to the United Kingdom

Category:Papua New Guinean Commanders of the Order of St Michael and St George[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. It was improper to empty the category, but the only !voter cited a sound argument to delete. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The third class of this order is Companion not Commander. Richiepip (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The category is currently empty. Delete per WP:OCAWARD. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:05, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Again, Richiepip, there is no point in having a week long discussion if you are going to empty a category out of process. There is also no point in renaming an empty category. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Commanders of the Order of St Michael and St George[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. It was improper to empty the category, but the only !voter cited a sound argument to delete. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The third class of this order is Companion not Commander. Richiepip (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The category is currently empty. Delete per WP:OCAWARD. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:05, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Richiepip, don't nominate a category at CFD and then empty it. Doing this makes a discussion pointless as you have already emptied the category. Liz Read! Talk! 01:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Emptying was simply a consequence of its entire existence being erroneous, it would not be correct for those articles to be in a category for something that does not exist. Richiepip (talk) 01:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      Comment. Let other people make that judgment. Mason (talk) 05:05, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Seasons in men's ice hockey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete/merge as nominated (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 20:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Ice hockey seasons are not categorized for men. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:54, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Matt Gaetz[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary category - unlikely that it will ever grow beyond just a few articles. Categories are not meta tags. ButlerBlog (talk) 17:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He's now a significant historical figure worthy of study. --Volvlogia (talk) 17:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't disagree. But that's not a reason for creating a category. That's what wikilinks, see alsos, and nav templates are for. ButlerBlog (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support delete. Eponymous categories are much rarer, serve to help navigating related topics, that can't be connected otherwise. Mason (talk) 19:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Seasons in ice hockey by country[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 13#Category:Seasons in ice hockey by country

Category:1989 in Australian ice hockey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 00:20, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROW. Each category has one article. The tree is not needed. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just delete, it is odd to categorize articles about a world championship by every participating country. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:17, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Australia hosted Group D in 1987 and Group C in 1989. They weren't just participants, they were hosts. –Aidan721 (talk) 03:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The articles confused me and got me believe that it entirely took place in Austria and Sweden respectively. In that case support merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Korean language in Japan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 20:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: only one page toobigtokale (talk) 16:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Koreans in China[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 00:20, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate scope toobigtokale (talk) 14:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:20, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. This format is unanimously approved in many CfDs: (1, 2, 3, 4...) Two of its benefits is that it unambiguously separates topic articles from people categories, per WP:COPSEP, and that it covers a wide range of topics (culture, local population seen collectively, people of recent or more ancient local presence etc.). Place Clichy (talk) 23:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Historical revisionism of comfort women[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 15#Category:Historical revisionism of comfort women

Bahá'í Faith in American Samoa and Samoa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Bahá'í Faith in Oceania, Category:Religion in American Samoa, and Category:Religion in Samoa. It was improper to empty the categories, but there were initially only two articles. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Article Baháʼí Faith in the Samoas treats the history of the Baháʼís in both parts of the Samoan archipelago. A user had create the first nominated category, which does not fall under the schemes at Category:Bahá'í Faith by country or Category:Religion by country. I attempted to create two national categories but I was reverted and therefore I ask the opinion of the community. Besides the main article, the only content is Malietoa Tanumafili II, head of state of (independent) Samoa, who was of the Bahá'í faith. Note that content relative to American Samoa is pretty light, even in the main article. My preference would be Option A (per the structure of parent and sibling categories) > Option C (seen the amount of content) > Option B. Place Clichy (talk) 13:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm for option B. From what I've seen while there is distinction of the communities there is also unity between them. However I'm not locally based - just what I've seen in the article's coverage that implies more in common than distinct between the places. Adding them to the schemes of "by country" seems more an option of adjustments. Smkolins (talk) 13:52, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note this also affects Malietoa Tanumafili II. Smkolins (talk) 13:55, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted that emptying as it seemed to happen after this nomination which we discourage. Liz Read! Talk! 00:44, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Overseas Korean groups[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 20:34, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overlap with Category:Korean diaspora toobigtokale (talk) 11:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/rename as applicable. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 00:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: this entire category tree is a trivial intersection. English expatriates is sufficient Mason (talk) 04:22, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in Barbados to Category:English expatriates in Barbados Mason (talk) 17:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in Barbados to Category:English expatriates in Barbados
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in Denmark to Category:English expatriates in Denmark
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in France to Category:English expatriates in France
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in Iran to Category:English expatriates in Iran
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in Jamaica to Category:English expatriates in Jamaica
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in Morocco to Category:English expatriates in Morocco
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in Portugal to Category:English expatriates in Portugal
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in Spain to Category:English expatriates in Spain
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in Sweden to Category:English expatriates in Sweden
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in the Dutch Republic to Category:English expatriates in the Dutch Republic
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in the East Indies to Category:English expatriates in the East Indies
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in the Grand Duchy of Tuscany to Category:English expatriates in the Grand Duchy of Tuscany
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in the Habsburg Netherlands to Category:English expatriates in the Habsburg Netherlands
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in the Holy Roman Empire to Category:English expatriates in the Holy Roman Empire
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in the Kingdom of Scotland to Category:English expatriates in the Kingdom of Scotland
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in the Mughal Empire to Category:English expatriates in the Mughal Empire
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in the Ottoman Empire to Category:English expatriates in the Ottoman Empire
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth to Category:English expatriates in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in the Republic of Venice to Category:English expatriates in the Republic of Venice
Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of England in the Tsardom of Russia to Category:English expatriates in the Tsardom of Russia
Category:Kingdom of England people in Newfoundland to Category:English expatriates in Newfoundland
Category:Kingdom of England people in the Kingdom of Ireland to Category:English expatriates in Ireland
Category:Kingdom of England people in the West Indies to Category:English expatriates in the West Indies
Category:People from the Kingdom of England in the Thirteen Colonies to Category:English expatriates in the Thirteen Colonies
Category:People of the Kingdom of England in Bermuda to Category:English expatriates in Bermuda Mason (talk) 17:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: the discussion has been procedural (which in this case seems to have been a Good Thing), but discussion on the proposal itself is still needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlastertalk 02:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Landowners from the Kingdom of England[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 17#Category:Landowners from the Kingdom of England

Category:Painters from the Kingdom of Ireland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Irish painters. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 20:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not a helpful intersection between regime and painters Mason (talk) 01:26, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of Ireland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/rename as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 22:08, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No need to narrow the category to an unnecessary distinction between regimes Mason (talk) 01:17, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Principality of Sedan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 22:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: small cat, that overlaps with Category:Sedan, Ardennes‎. The child categories only have one page in it. Arthur Johnston (poet) Mason (talk) 01:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suspect the principality belonged to the Holy Roman Empire before annexation by France, but I can't find any information about that. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    You might be right, but I did pick france based on the history section of the main article. My understanding is that the principality started as part of the french kingdom in 1424, broke away from the French kingdom in 1560, and then were annexed back by France in 1642. I'm not opposed to another target for the merge (but france was the only one I really saw in my brief read). Mason (talk) 19:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge for now, if anyone has access to other information the article can still be recategorized afterwards. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Emigrants from the Kingdom of Scotland to Sweden[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete. Specifically, merge the first three as proposed; delete Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of Scotland in the Swedish Empire instead of renaming. (non-admin closure) HouseBlastertalk 21:57, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overlapping category: the intersection with regime isn't defining for emigrants/expatriates. Alternative idea for Category:Expatriates of the Kingdom of Scotland in the Swedish Empire is to merge it into Category:Scottish expatriates in Sweden per overlapping cat Mason (talk) 00:54, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Right, that was my leaning too. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete for Swedish empire is fine with me. I don't really have strong opinions about it. My goal is to consolidate redunant categories Mason (talk) 23:52, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_October_5&oldid=1180938482"