Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 9
March 11 >

March 10[edit]

Category:Male actors by city or town in Switzerland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one city in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason (talk) 23:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Culture of Russia by ethnicity[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 18#Category:Culture of Russia by ethnicity

Category:Thracian culture[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 18#Category:Thracian culture

Category:Critics employed by Politiken[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Politiken writers. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now; only two articles in this category. Edit: occurred to me they are likely already in subcategories of Category:Danish critics so just merge to the first category. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:35, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:SUNY community colleges[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:OVERLAP. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Mason (talk) 18:29, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dual-tube tunnels[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Mason (talk) 19:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The number of tubes isn't defining for tunnels. Mason (talk) 19:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Single-tube tunnels with a proposed second tube[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unhelpful for navigation. there are only two tunnels in this entire tree Mason (talk) 19:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Road tunnels in Algeria[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Having a single page in a category is unhelpful for navigation. Mason (talk) 19:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Janów Podlaski[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 18#Category:Janów Podlaski

Category:Horse farms in Spain[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 18#Category:Horse farms in Spain

Category:Syrian Turkmens[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The previous nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 13#Category:Syrian Turkmen appears flawed to me. The individual biographies should be moved down into the existing set category subcat Syrian Turkmen people. The topic category should be renamed back to match the main article Syrian Turkmen, which already uses that term as a plural without adding "s", for Syrians of Turkish origin. IIUC, "Turk-men" is already a plural, referring to people of Turkish origin, whereas "Turkmens" are people from Central Asia. – Fayenatic London 21:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pinging previous participants Place Clichy, Omnis Scientia, HouseBlaster. – Fayenatic London 21:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support nom. If this is the best way to categorize this group of people then I have no objection. Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:02, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: closely related article Iraqi Turkmen is a lot more detailed on how the term Turkmen/Turkoman/Turcoman came to describe this group in Iraq and Syria, instead of just Turk. That article does use the plural Turkmens, although inconsistently. Note that the etymology comes from the transcription of an Arabic suffix, and not from English man/men as in e.g. Norseman/Norsemen. Neither article suggests that Turkman is the singular. The associated category is Category:Iraqi Turkmens. Article Turkmen Mountain consistently uses Turkmen for the singular and Turkmens for the plural. I agree with moving biographies though, which I did as it does not require CfD. There are plenty of articles about ethnic groups which use the singular or the adjective as a title, so I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case here. Place Clichy (talk) 00:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Place Clichy's explanation is very plausible. Other European languages preserve "men" in their translation of Turkmenistan while men is not the plural of man in those languages. I suppose in English "men" in Turkmenistan is also unrelated to the plural of man. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 16:52, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing my vote neutral with regards to the nominated rename BUT will support whatever is considered the correct form of address for this group of people. Omnis Scientia (talk) 17:56, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Quantum Leap[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 18#Category:Quantum Leap

Category:People of Inca royalty descent[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Chilean people of Quechua descent. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection, as far as I'm aware, we don't have other categories at the intersection of royal decent and ethnicity. Mason (talk) 01:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Japanese superhero films‎ by decade[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: For the same reason mentioned here. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The categories do not seem redundant and seem to help navigation.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose A category by country is not redundant. Dimadick (talk) 12:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We can have "Japanese superhero films" as a category containing all needed. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge to all parents. This intersection between nationality, film type, and decade is pretty narrow. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 10:06, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Indian superhero films by decade[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: upmerge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Extremely redundant, as the categories 1980 superhero films, 1990s superhero films, 2000s superhero films and 2010s superhero films and Indian superhero films exist. We don't have similar categories for American superhero films, even though there have been countless since Iron Man 2 (2010). Kailash29792 (talk) 04:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge to all parents. Thank you for nominating as a whole. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I don't understand why these categories should be considered redundant, let alone extremely so. Create the categories for American superhero films if you wish.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Do we really need "1990s Indian superhero films" which has only two entries? The parent categories aren't so insanely overpopulated that they need such further subdivision. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe 1990s Indian superhero films has only 2 entries so far but the other do indeed contain a lot of films (if the number of articles is the issue). -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 04:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge and delete make sure all movies are in their decade film category and superhero film category and then purge. SportingFlyer T·C 08:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge for now. There's no need to diffuse to this much detail right now. Mason (talk) 18:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Works by date[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, overlapping scope, e.g. it is strange to have Category:Radio programs by period and Category:Drawings by date in different parent categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I think the merge target name is better Mason (talk) 16:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose; "by period" is useful for e.g. antiquity and Renaissance, while "by date" is a useful sub-cat for centuries, years etc. By all means rename the radio parent and others like it to "by date". – Fayenatic London 11:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak oppose Although I do see the advantages of a merge, I've got the same concerns as Fayenatic. I've got a slight favour of the present situation, as "date" implies at least a year, and "period" is much broader and thus not synonymous. Incidentally, renaming Texts by date to Texts by period seems a good idea. NLeeuw (talk) 17:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:35, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Professional wrestling in Afghanistan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per NARROWCAT. Category contains one article which is a list of results of shows, some of which were held in the country. User:Namiba 17:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the one article is not specifically about Afghanistan. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Association football hooligans[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overlapping category Mason (talk) 04:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a subcategory for specific people who were or are association football hooligans; the parent category is about the broader phenomenon of association football hooliganism. CJ-Moki (talk) 04:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There are only two people in here. It's not helpful for navigation. Mason (talk) 05:15, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge for now, without objection to recreate the category when some more articles are available. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:37, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 10:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 17:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge for now, without objection to recreation if it can be appropriately populated. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Women from Åland by occupation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Effectively upmerge for now because there is only one page in here, and the child category is already in children of People from Åland by occupation and Finnish women by occupation Mason (talk) 16:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional dead characters[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 18#Category:Fictional dead characters

American people of Arab descent[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename per WP:NONDEF/WP:OR. For example John Halaka is of Egyptian descent, and Michael Nouri is of Iraqi descent. So they may be of Arab ethnic descent, but there is no information about it, instead they may just as well be of e.g. Coptic and Assyrian ethnic descent respectively. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Mason (talk) 16:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Fictional university or college people[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:NONDEF, the categories are largely populated with fictional alumni and it almost never plays a significant role in the flow of the story line. There is still Category:Fictional academics for characters who really work at a university, or Category:Fictional college students for students. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Mason (talk) 16:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:History of countries on work[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Works about history by country. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename, the current category name is just odd. An alternative could be Category:History works about countries. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Either would be a much better name. (I slightly like the proposed name better than the alternative) Mason (talk) 16:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Film redirects with incorrect class[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not used in Template:WikiProject Film and can't find this category linked to from anywhere other than in a /doc. Was possibly used in Template:WikiProject Film/B-checklist categories which was deleted. Gonnym (talk) 15:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Film banners with redundant parameters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not used in Template:WikiProject Film and can't find this category linked to from anywhere other than in a /doc. Was possibly used in Template:WikiProject Film/B-checklist categories which was deleted. Gonnym (talk) 15:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Film articles needing B-Class review[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:18, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not used in Template:WikiProject Film and can't find this category linked to from anywhere other than in a /doc. Was possibly used in Template:WikiProject Film/B-checklist categories which was deleted. Gonnym (talk) 15:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hurricane season button templates[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Hurricanes are not the only type of storm this is used for. This should be moved to accurately reflect usage. In a similar vein, Template:Hurricane season bar button, Template:Hurricane season bar end, Template:Hurricane season bar gap, and Template:Hurricane season bar start should also be moved (hurricane to tropical cyclone). Noah, AATalk 11:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:American expatriate male actors in England[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 18#Category:American expatriate male actors in England

Category:People from Ghardaïa[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 18#Category:People from Ghardaïa

Category:American female winemakers[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 18#Category:American female winemakers

Category:Launch titles[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete all. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category and its subcategories were all added very recently. I would suggest deleting the category and all subcategories as WP:NONDEF violations as I don't believe being a "launch title" is defining and is more like advertising than anything. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The subcategories should be deleted too then. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:49, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and delete subcategories per Marcocapelle. NLeeuw (talk) 17:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tagging and listing subcats. – Fayenatic London 17:37, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting given most of the categories under discussion have not been tagged for a full week. If there are no further comments by next week consensus seems to favor deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 04:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Napoleonic looting of art[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 18#Category:Napoleonic looting of art

Category:Czech footbag players[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Not enough people to diffuse by nationality Mason (talk) 01:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Austrian Nazi lawyers[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 18#Category:Austrian Nazi lawyers

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_March_10&oldid=1214409454"