Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 38
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 |
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 March 17#Template:Officially used writing systems in India
(Initiated 68 days ago on 17 March 2024) Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} by Primefac. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Shukan_Shincho#Requested_move_29_February_2024
(Initiated 84 days ago on 29 February 2024) – Requested move open several months, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Sri_Lanka_Armed_Forces#RFC:_United_Nations_Report_on_Sri_Lankan_Civil_War
(Initiated 66 days ago on 18 March 2024) RFC tag has expired.Laxshen (talk) 09:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Sri_Lanka_Armed_Forces#RFC_on_Peacekeeping_Scandal
(Initiated 66 days ago on 19 March 2024) RFC tag has expired.Laxshen (talk) 09:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_March_1#Archelaus_I_of_Macedon]
(Initiated 100 days ago on 13 February 2024) * Pppery * it has begun... 17:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 8#Category:African-American women historians
(Initiated 94 days ago on 20 February 2024) * Pppery * it has begun... 17:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 1#Category:National Hockey League first-round draft picks
(Initiated 92 days ago on 21 February 2024) * Pppery * it has begun... 17:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Amytis_of_Babylon#Requested_move_12_February_2024
(Initiated 101 days ago on 12 February 2024) – Requested move open for several months, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 16:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Tupelo_(disambiguation)#Requested_move_17_February_2024
(Initiated 96 days ago on 17 February 2024) – Requested move open for over a month, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Isabella_II#Requested_move_18_February_2024
(Initiated 95 days ago on 18 February 2024) – Requested move open several months, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Vyaz_(Cyrillic_calligraphy)#Requested_move_26_February_2024
(Initiated 88 days ago on 26 February 2024) – Requested move open several months, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Edward_V_of_England#Requested_move_29_February_2024
(Initiated 84 days ago on 29 February 2024) – Requested move open for a month, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Lusitania#Requested_move_29_February_2024
(Initiated 84 days ago on 29 February 2024) – Requested move open for a month, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 21:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Deliberate crash landings on extraterrestrial bodies#Requested move 15 April 2024
(Initiated 38 days ago on 15 April 2024) - Requested move has been untouched since 15 April, and consensus was achieved. Please close the move request and initiate the move, thank you. 50.245.38.157 (talk) 7:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:David_III_of_Tao#Requested_move_9_February_2024
(Initiated 105 days ago on 9 February 2024) – Requested move open for nearly 2 months, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 16:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Doing... —Compassionate727 (T·C) 03:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 16:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrative action review#Indefinite TPA revocation for “proxying while blocked”
(Initiated 40 days ago on 14 April 2024). I'm involved, but consensus looks pretty clear regarding the specific action. There have been no new comments for 4 days. Thryduulf (talk) 20:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}}. Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I closes
(Initiated 99 days ago on 15 February 2024) As the first round of Phase I reaches 30 days in action, I'll be listing discussions here as they reach time. Once the final discussion has been closed, this heading can be archived. Proposals ripe for closing:
Proposal 2: Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA, initiated at 02:19 (UTC) on 15 February 2024Proposal 3b: Make the first two days discussion-only (trial), initiated at 03:00 (UTC) on 20 February 2024Proposal 4: Prohibit threaded discussion (trial), initiated at 11:33 (UTC) on 18 February 2024Proposal 12c: Lower the high end of the bureaucrats' discretionary zone from 75% to 70%, initiated on 1 March 2024Proposal 13: Admin elections, initiated at 05:53 (UTC) on 23 February 2024Proposal 14: Suffrage requirements, initiated on 23 February 2024Proposal 17: Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions, initiated on 17:56 (UTC) on 27 February 2024Proposal 24: Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process, initiated on 1 March 2024
Thanks! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- I've closed 3b and 7. I believe 13 and 14 are also overdue now too. – Joe (talk) 13:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Updated, thanks! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nearly every proposal can now be closed. Soni (talk) 22:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- and I think now any and all can be closed. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 03:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nearly every proposal can now be closed. Soni (talk) 22:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Updated, thanks! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- 4 was closed User:Wehwalt. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:41, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Proposal 24 was closed by AirshipJungleman29; marking this as {{done}} for the bot as all proposals in Phase I now appear to be closed. All the best, —a smart kitten[meow] 05:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Paul_Atreides#RfC_on_the_infobox_image
(Initiated 75 days ago on 9 March 2024) Trying this one again. Latest comment: 3 days ago, 98 comments, 21 people in discussion. Admins are involved, vigorous WP:NFCC discussion. Closure would be good. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for posting this; I was about to do so myself. The consensus seems pretty clear, but given this is a copyright issue I think a formal close is beneficial. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Gråbergs Gråa Sång and InfiniteNexus: {{done}}. Thryduulf (talk) 14:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 1#Category:Indoor ice hockey venues
(Initiated 83 days ago on 1 March 2024) – HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 13:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{close}} by editor Toadette. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 14:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:South_Western_Railway_(train_operating_company)#Requested_move_25_February_2024
(Initiated 88 days ago on 25 February 2024) – Requested move open several months, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} by User:Vanderwaalforces. Natg 19 (talk) 01:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:World Rally Championship-2#Requested move 7 April 2024
(Initiated 46 days ago on 7 April 2024) - Requested move needs closure. Rally Wonk (talk) 11:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{close}} by editor Wikiexplorationandhelping. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 14:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Charles_XI_of_Sweden#Requested_move_13_January_2024
(Initiated 131 days ago on 13 January 2024) – Requested move open for 2 months, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 16:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Has now been open for three months. 2601:249:9301:D570:9012:4870:54CD:5F95 (talk) 04:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
RfC: Is the OCB RS?
(Initiated 59 days ago on 26 March 2024) This WP:RSN RfC was initiated on March 26, with the last !vote occurring on March 28. Ten editors participated in the discussion and, without prejudicing the close one way or the other, I believe a closer may discover a clear consensus emerged. It was bot-archived without closure on April 4 due to lack of recent activity. Chetsford (talk) 21:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Doing... voorts (talk/contributions) 21:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} voorts (talk/contributions) 00:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:2 World Trade Center#Split proposal 16 February 2024
(Initiated 97 days ago on 16 February 2024) Split discussion started over a month ago. TarnishedPathtalk 11:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} Jonathan Deamer (talk) 08:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#RfC: enacting X3
(Initiated 77 days ago on 7 March 2024) SilverLocust 💬 22:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- I came here to add this discussion here. There have been no new comments for over a fortnight. Thryduulf (talk) 14:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question for other folks at CR: does my single comment in this discussion suggesting an edit to the RfC statement for clarity preclude me from closing this discussion as involved? voorts (talk/contributions) 01:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{close}} by editor Mach61. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 21:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:2024_Haitian_jailbreak#Requested_move_8_March_2024
(Initiated 77 days ago on 8 March 2024) – Requested move open for nearly 2 months, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 05:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}}. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 17:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
(Initiated 78 days ago on 6 March 2024) – Requested move open for nearly 2 months, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 05:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}}. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 16:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:2018–2019_Gaza_border_protests#Requested_move_24_March_2024
(Initiated 60 days ago on 24 March 2024) – Requested move open for over a month, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 04:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{close}} by editor Vpab15. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 10:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ganbare_Goemon_Kirakira_Dōchū:_Boku_ga_Dancer_ni_Natta_Wake_(2nd_nomination)
(Initiated 21 days ago on 3 May 2024) Requesting a closure for the following discussion. Thanks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ganbare_Goemon_Kirakira_Dōchū:_Boku_ga_Dancer_ni_Natta_Wake_(2nd_nomination) Oz346 (talk) 13:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} by User: Geschichte. Natg 19 (talk) 16:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Francis_Scott_Key_Bridge_(Baltimore)#RfC:_Past_or_present_tense_for_the_bridge
(Initiated 48 days ago on 5 April 2024) RfC needs help to close. -- GreenC 19:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} Charcoal feather (talk) 00:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk: Interstate 90#RFC: Infobox junctions
(Initiated 84 days ago on 29 February 2024) Discussion is about to expire and will need closure. RoadFan294857 (talk) 15:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Doing... ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} RoadFan294857 ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:2024 United States presidential election/Archive 7#RFC: What should the criteria of inclusion be for the infobox? (Question 1)
(Initiated 71 days ago on 14 March 2024) It's been about two weeks, since the RFC tag expired. GoodDay (talk) 14:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Archived. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 03:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:List of generation VI Pokémon#Greninja Merge Discussion
(Initiated 50 days ago on 3 April 2024) – The discussion has been largely inactive for the past month, and though there are occasional comments, it has largely slowed. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 02:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:3α-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase#Requested move 9 April 2024
(Initiated 44 days ago on 9 April 2024) – I would close this if I hadn't opened it. It has been a month and there is one other participant (supporting the move). I can do any cleanup needed. SilverLocust 💬 22:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}}. I believe even an involved person should have been able to close this discussion. I am not an admin, so someone else can confirm this Soni (talk) 10:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Soni: Thanks. Contrast WP:MERGECLOSE ("
Closing of merge discussions differs from closing of requested move discussions in that closings of uncontroversial merge discussions by involved users are allowed.
") with WP:RMCLOSE (saying not to do so but rather to request closure here). I considered WP:IARing that after a month, but I had already said after 7 days to wait for an uninvolved closer. SilverLocust 💬 15:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)- Yeah that's essentially the same read I had. Technically RMCLOSE says so, but I don't see a reason to not invoke IAR here. I actually still do not know why all RMs need to go through an uninvolved closer, and I've tried to dig through talk histories for the why. Might be worth asking in WT:RM than here though Soni (talk) 16:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's mostly because uncontroversial RMs are most often closed pretty quickly by editors who check WP:RME, whereas WP:MERGE closures are much more backlogged (Category:Articles to be merged) and more complicated to implement. SilverLocust 💬 16:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah that's essentially the same read I had. Technically RMCLOSE says so, but I don't see a reason to not invoke IAR here. I actually still do not know why all RMs need to go through an uninvolved closer, and I've tried to dig through talk histories for the why. Might be worth asking in WT:RM than here though Soni (talk) 16:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Soni: Thanks. Contrast WP:MERGECLOSE ("
Talk:Indo-Pakistani_war_of_1947–1948#RfC_on_what_result_is_to_be_entered_against_the_result_parameter_of_the_infobox
(Initiated 154 days ago on 22 December 2023) No new comments for over 45 days. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} Courtesy ping to Ratnahastin. BilledMammal (talk) 04:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:International Churches of Christ#RfC on Singapore court case
(Initiated 134 days ago on 10 January 2024) RfC template expired on the 10th of February 2024. TarnishedPathtalk 13:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} Courtesy ping to TarnishedPath. BilledMammal (talk) 04:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Much appreciated. TarnishedPathtalk 04:33, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:SpaceX Starship#RfC on IFT-3
(Initiated 63 days ago on 21 March 2024) This is a contentious issue with accusations of tendentious editing, so the RfC would benefit from a formal closure. Redraiderengineer (talk) 14:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- A note for the closing editor... an inexperienced editor attempted to close this discussion and didn't really address the arguments. There's been some edit warring over the close, but it should be resolved by an experienced, uninvolved editor. Nemov (talk) 19:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Another note for the closing editor: beware the related discussion at Talk:SpaceX Starship#Do not classify IFT-1, 2 and 3 as success or failure. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- That discussion has only been going for two weeks and closing the RfC will not preclude editors from coming to a consensus on whether or not to remove the categorization entirely. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Another note for the closing editor: beware the related discussion at Talk:SpaceX Starship#Do not classify IFT-1, 2 and 3 as success or failure. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} Soni (talk) 00:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Soni Thanks for closing, but my revert of the original close wasn't out of process and it was discussed in a couple of different places including the editor's TALK. WP:CR says non-admin can close as long as they are prepared to discuss and justify their closing rationale. The editor never responded or justified their close. Given the contentious nature of the discussion the RFC required a better close. Nemov (talk) 01:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I did read that talk page just afterwards. On second thought, I agree with you. I had mistakenly thought you were involved with the discussion, which coloured my opinion on this. I would have still preferred striking and clearly showing the removed close (given at least one editor disagreed with the revert), but I guess going through Close Challenge just for the sake of it would be pointless bureaucracy.
- I still hold to my overall close; that RFC was getting punted to the second discussion no matter which way it closes. Soni (talk) 02:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Soni Thanks for closing, but my revert of the original close wasn't out of process and it was discussed in a couple of different places including the editor's TALK. WP:CR says non-admin can close as long as they are prepared to discuss and justify their closing rationale. The editor never responded or justified their close. Given the contentious nature of the discussion the RFC required a better close. Nemov (talk) 01:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Saleh al-Arouri#Merge proposal
(Initiated 133 days ago on 11 January 2024) Discussion has stalled since March with no new comments. It appears that there is no clear consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aviationwikiflight (talk • contribs) 11:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Frederik_IX_of_Denmark#Requested_move_15_January_2024
(Initiated 129 days ago on 15 January 2024) – Requested move open for 2 months, needs closure.98.228.137.44 (talk) 18:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Now has been open for three months. 170.76.231.175 (talk) 15:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
{{Done}}. I added a script to help me close RMs, but it failed to mark this as a technical move request(?). Is there a manual way to ask for help on "I closed this RM but the UI did not allow me to"? Right now I used CSD G6 to allow for the move, but I suspect there's a more suitable way. Soni (talk) 02:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Soni: Are you aware of Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Uncontroversial technical requests? I usually use that. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I now am. I vaguely saw that page earlier, but I think I decided to keep looking because it wasn't clear to me based on other sections if "I closed an RM" counted as a "uncontroversial" technical request. I'll use that page or the user script from now, thank you. Soni (talk) 03:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- It does. In fact, I'm certain I read somewhere that technical requests by RM closers should be honored even when the page mover disagrees with the close/expects that it will be challenged, although now I can't find where. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 03:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Found it: Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Non-admin closure, paragraph #4. Although my memory of what that section said did not serve me well. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 03:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- It does. In fact, I'm certain I read somewhere that technical requests by RM closers should be honored even when the page mover disagrees with the close/expects that it will be challenged, although now I can't find where. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 03:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I now am. I vaguely saw that page earlier, but I think I decided to keep looking because it wasn't clear to me based on other sections if "I closed an RM" counted as a "uncontroversial" technical request. I'll use that page or the user script from now, thank you. Soni (talk) 03:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:2003_Pacific_hurricane_season#Proposed_merge_of_Hurricane_Nora_(2003)_into_2003_Pacific_hurricane_season
(Initiated 114 days ago on 30 January 2024) Noah, AATalk 13:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Genital_modification_and_mutilation#Requested_move_26_February_2024
(Initiated 88 days ago on 26 February 2024) – Requested move open several months, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{close}} by editor BilledMammal. Charcoal feather (talk) 16:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Afrophobia#Requested_move_4_March_2024
(Initiated 80 days ago on 4 March 2024) – Requested move open nearly 2 months, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 05:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Alexander,_Prince_of_Schaumburg-Lippe#Requested_move_10_March_2024
(Initiated 74 days ago on 10 March 2024) – Requested move open for nearly 2 months, needs closure. Natg 19 (talk) 04:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:33, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Cumnock (original) railway station#Requested move 14 April 2024
(Initiated 40 days ago on 14 April 2024) No new comments for over three weeks Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 20:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:First contact (science fiction)#Splitting off the list
(Initiated 27 days ago on 26 April 2024) – It's been more than a week since the last comment. The majority of the conversation is between two users, and there's clearly no consensus. Ships & Space(Edits) 16:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{close}} by editor Altenmann. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 00:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Ecoforestry#Merge_proposal
(Initiated 22 days ago on 1 May 2024) As the proposer I presume I cannot close this. It was started more than a week ago and opinions differed somewhat. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} Charcoal feather (talk) 21:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User hate CCP
(Initiated 42 days ago on 11 April 2024) Cheers, —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 18:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Doing... —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Killing of journalists in the Israel–Hamas war#Merge proposal (5 January 2024)
(Initiated 139 days ago on 5 January 2024) The discussion has been inactive for two weeks, with a preference against the merge proposal. CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 19:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Eat_Bulaga!#Merger_of_Eat_Bulaga!_and_E.A.T.
(Initiated 139 days ago on 6 January 2024) The discussion wasn't inactive for 7 days. It seems there's no clear consensus on merging those two articles into one. 107.185.128.255 (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's been over a month. So, it could be a good time to close that discussion. 107.185.128.255 (talk) 17:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#RfC closure review request at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 433#Closing (archived) RfC: Mondoweiss
(Initiated 38 days ago on 16 April 2024) - already the oldest thread on the page, and at the time of this comment, there has only been one comment in the past nine days. starship.paint (RUN) 03:15, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Doing... —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 16:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Awdal#RFC - Habr Awal/Isaaq clan
(Initiated 151 days ago on 24 December 2023) ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
{{Done}} although I wouldn't mind a 2nd set of eyes on the close. I'm not as sure on this as I'd like (which I suppose is no consensus). Either way, a second look never hurt anyone. Soni (talk) 15:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Whadjuk#RfC: Inclusion of Noongar words
(Initiated 68 days ago on 17 March 2024)
No new posts for over a month. Legobot auto-removed the RFC tag, but I'd like a definite outcome. Mitch Ames (talk) 08:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Strong objection - there is no such thing as a definite outcome in this particular issue, it is unresolved and likely to remain that way. JarrahTree 09:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
{{Done}} Soni (talk) 11:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:2024 United States presidential election#RfC: Define the threshold in national polls to include candidates in the infobox - new proposal
(Initiated 9 days ago on 15 May 2024) An RfC on exactly the same matter was literally closed a few days ago. Prcc27 (talk) 15:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{close}} by editor Redrose64. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 04:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Russo-Ukrainian War#RFC on Listing of Belarus
(Initiated 68 days ago on 16 March 2024) Hello, this RFC was started on 16 March 2024 and as of now was active for more than a month (nearly 1,5 month to be exact). I think a month is enough for every interested user to express their opinion and to vote at RFC and the last vote at this RFC was made by user Mellk on 15 April 2024 (nearly two weeks ago and within a month since the start of this RFC). The question because of which this RFC was started previously resulted in quite strong disagreements between multiple users, but I think there already is a WP:CONS of 12 users who already voted at this RFC. Since the contentious topics procedure applies to page Russo-Ukrainian War, I think this RFC must be closed by uninvolved user/administrator to ensure a valid WP:CONS and to prevent further disputes/edit warring about this question in the future. -- Pofka (talk) 09:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Will an experienced uninvolved editor please close this RFC. If there is a consensus that Belarus should be listed, but not as to how it should be listed, please close with the least strong choice, Robert McClenon (talk) 17:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think it should not be closed with the "least strong choice", but instead with a choice which received the most votes (the strongest choice). The most users chose C variant (in total 6 users: My very best wishes, Pofka, Gödel2200, ManyAreasExpert, Licks-rocks, CVDX), while the second strongest choice was A variant (in total 5 users). So I think the WP:CONS of this RFC question is C variant. -- Pofka (talk) 18:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Doing... —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:International Churches of Christ#Request for Comment on About Self sourcing on beliefs section of a religious organization’s article
(Initiated 38 days ago on 15 April 2024) No new comments in eight days. TarnishedPathtalk 01:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Doing... voorts (talk/contributions) 01:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} Courtesy ping to TarnishedPath. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Voorts, must appreciated. TarnishedPathtalk 02:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:List_of_generation_I_Pokémon#Snorlax_Merge_Discussion
(Initiated 50 days ago on 4 April 2024) Proposer of merge, discussion has been open for a month and seems to be shifted towards keep, but I'd appreciate an outside opinion as there have been some votes of opposition on top of my nomination. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 16:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} Charcoal feather (talk) 02:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#Medical schools in the Caribbean
(Initiated 63 days ago on 21 March 2024) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Doing... —Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Armenia–Azerbaijan_border_crisis#Requested_move_30_April_2024
(Initiated 23 days ago on 30 April 2024) There haven't been new comments for over a week. Vanezi (talk) 12:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{close}}. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 06:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Libertarian Party (Australia)#Conservatism
(Initiated 55 days ago on 29 March 2024) RfC template expired. TarnishedPathtalk 01:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Doing... voorts (talk/contributions) 21:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}}. Courtesy ping @TarnishedPath. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Voorts appreciated. TarnishedPathtalk 00:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Havana syndrome#RfC on the presentation of the Havana Syndrome investigative report content
(Initiated 29 days ago on 25 April 2024) No new comments in 12 days. {{u|Gtoffoletto}} talk 08:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Gtoffoletto: {{Done}} Qono (talk) 06:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
(Initiated 107 days ago on 6 February 2024) Requested move open for nearly 2 months. Natg 19 (talk) 17:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Has now been open for three months. 66.99.15.163 (talk) 19:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} Courtesy ping to Natg 19. BilledMammal (talk) 18:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
RfC: Tasnim News Agency
(Initiated 101 days ago on 12 February 2024)
Closure request for this WP:RSN RfC initiated on February 12, with the last !vote occurring on March 18. It was bot-archived without closure on March 26 due to lack of recent activity. - Amigao (talk) 02:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:2023_Hamas-led_attack_on_Israel#RfC:_Hamas_victory
(Initiated 36 days ago on 17 April 2024) This is ready for a closse. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 02:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Weaponization of antisemitism#Requested move 21 April 2024
(Initiated 32 days ago on 21 April 2024) No new comments since 12 May. Graham (talk) 06:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{close}}. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 14:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk: Elissa Slotkin#Labor Positions and the 2023 UAW Strike
(Initiated 55 days ago on 30 March 2024) RfC expired, no clear consensus. andrew.robbins (talk) 04:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Julian Assange#RFC: Calling Assange a journalist
(Initiated 48 days ago on 6 April 2024) RfC template was removed by the robot 6th of May. Last comment was the 2nd of May. TarnishedPathtalk 11:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Appreciated. TarnishedPathtalk 13:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#Category:French forts in the United States
(Initiated 63 days ago on 22 March 2024) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} by Bibliomaniac15. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 10#Category:19th-century Roman Catholic church buildings in Réunion
(Initiated 61 days ago on 23 March 2024) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 13:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{close}} by editor Pppery. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 19:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Category:Asian American billionaires
(Initiated 30 days ago on 24 April 2024) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} * Pppery * it has begun... 19:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Maersk Hangzhou#Second merge proposal
(Initiated 120 days ago on 24 January 2024) Merge discussion involving CTOPS that has been open for 2 weeks now. Needs closure. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 04:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- @WeatherWriter: I would give it a few days as the discussion is now active with new comments. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 00:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- As nominator, I support a non consensus closure of this discussion so we can create an RFC to discuss how WP:ONEEVENT applies in this situation. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 21:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} Charcoal feather (talk) 12:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Forest_management#Merge_proposal
(Initiated 26 days ago on 28 April 2024) As the proposer I presume I cannot close this. It was started more than a week ago and opinions differed somewhat. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Doing... Goldenarrow9 (talk) 19:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}}. @Chidgk1: I have added my closing remarks at the talk page and archived the discussion. Hope it seems fair to everyone. Goldenarrow9 (talk) 20:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Goldenarrow9 Thanks for your clear summaries. So does ‘weak consensus’ at the top mean I can go ahead and merge everything or does it mean I should do nothing? Or something in between or can I decide for myself? Chidgk1 (talk) 08:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Chidgk1: Please refer to my detailed closing remarks on the merits of each proposal. I would advice against merging everything as there was clearly no consensus on some of the proposed merges. I would say where there is a local consensus, you can move forward with the merge keeping in mind the considerations and pitfalls that have been highlighted in the discussion (and my remarks). On some of the proposals, there was no proper consensus (and I have mentioned as such) - avoid making any changes on those.
In short, don't just act on the basis of the 1-word status at the top. Instead, read my entire closing remarks along with the context of the discussion to see which merges you can move forward with. Goldenarrow9 (talk) 11:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Chidgk1: Please refer to my detailed closing remarks on the merits of each proposal. I would advice against merging everything as there was clearly no consensus on some of the proposed merges. I would say where there is a local consensus, you can move forward with the merge keeping in mind the considerations and pitfalls that have been highlighted in the discussion (and my remarks). On some of the proposals, there was no proper consensus (and I have mentioned as such) - avoid making any changes on those.
- @Goldenarrow9 Thanks for your clear summaries. So does ‘weak consensus’ at the top mean I can go ahead and merge everything or does it mean I should do nothing? Or something in between or can I decide for myself? Chidgk1 (talk) 08:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}}. @Chidgk1: I have added my closing remarks at the talk page and archived the discussion. Hope it seems fair to everyone. Goldenarrow9 (talk) 20:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 May 1#Chloe Lewis (figure skater)
(Initiated 22 days ago on 1 May 2024) * Pppery * it has begun... 17:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} by Daniel. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2024#New article
(Initiated 12 days ago on 11 May 2024) Split proposal for a new article surrounding an issue under arbitration sanctions - the conflict in the Middle East. Any involved editor closing it will be seen as taking sides, as such an uninvolved third-party admin is needed to close the requested split to prevent tensions on the talk page rising. PicturePerfect666 (talk) 20:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} - I have been watching the disputes on the page for the past few days. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:25, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
RFC on including DC Comics
(Initiated 154 days ago on 21 December 2023) Long past 'best before' date. - wolf 17:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Thewolfchild: {{Done}} Qono (talk) 02:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Tesla,_Inc.#Rfc_regarding_Tesla's_founders
(Initiated 37 days ago on 17 April 2024) Will an experienced uninvolved editor please assess consensus? There has been a request at DRN now that the RFC has completed activity, but what is needed is formal closure of the RFC. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{done}} Robert McClenon (talk) 04:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:12 February 2024 Rafah strikes#Merge proposal to Rafah offensive
(Initiated 101 days ago on 13 February 2024) The discussion has been inactive for over a month, with a clear preference against the merge proposal. CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 19:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- {{close}} by editor QuicoleJR. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk: Political controversies in the Eurovision Song Contest#Requested move 13 May 2024
(Initiated 10 days ago on 13 May 2024)
Move proposal on a contentious area which has been going more than long enough.
PicturePerfect666 (talk) 03:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{close}} by editor BilledMammal on 21 May 2024. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 02:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)