Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 13
 | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
| Biomedcode – 5 articles deleted – 05:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
It was requested I file a COI/N report in the discussion Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#biomedcode.com_et_al. --Ronz 00:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Forwarded (1): [Alexander Fleming] Thank you a lot for tour message. Why an article which refers to a governmental, non-profit institution with a history closely linked to the Greek Foundation for Basic Biological Research "Alexander Fleming" and research involved in areas of immunology, molecular biology and genetics and molecular oncology is not significant to be included in Wikipedia? --Afantitis 13:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC) Forwarded (2): [Tuberculosis Antimicrobial Acquisition and Coordinating Facility (TAACF)]Hi Athaenara, regarding your post to my listings as :conflict of interest and single-purpose account, from a different point of view, a wikipedia user should contribute only to the articles he/she had an expertise. This is may be a way to increase the high standard of knowledge which wikipedia provides. We have not all wikipedia users expertise in every matter.Is it possible to have your feedback on this? Thank you in advance. Afantitis 20:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Dear Athaenara, instated of moving my questions from your personal discussion page it will be better and if you can give me specific answers to my questions and not only recommends my articles for deletion. Afantitis Forwarded (3): [Tuberculosis Antimicrobial Acquisition and Coordinating Facility (TAACF)] Dear Athaenara, instated of moving my questions from your personal discussion page it will be better and if you can give me specific answers to my questions and not only recommends my articles for deletion. Afantitis 20:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Paul Ulrich – 4 articles deleted – 09:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
→ See also: Articles for deletion/Paul Ulrich and Articles for deletion/Blacksmith Books
Aside from the obvious COI concerns, I think there are some notability questions about all 3 articles as well. I'd really like some advice on how best to handle this situation. Thanks, Doc Tropics 03:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
I've done the deed: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Ulrich. The publisher probably needs separate treatment and his wife seems more notable, so I've left those alone for now. MER-C 05:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Michael Mullan and other articles. – Resolved. – 05:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Michael Mullan and other articles
I've been cleaning up these articles a bit (ok, drastically) during the past week, and Horntz (judging from this message) may have mended his or her ways. — Athaenara ✉ 09:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Avantoure – Article deleted – 05:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
→ See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avantoure
Fairly self-explanatory spam - already been CSD'd but there's another copy in userspace. EliminatorJR Talk 20:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Michael J. Broderick – Article deleted – 01:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Julia Suits – Article deleted – 05:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Autobiographical editing, apparent feelings of article ownership - one edit summary states "(I'm deleting alot of unnecessary info. As the subject I'd prefer minimal, pertinent info)". RJASE1 Talk 13:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Out of Space (film) and Labyrinth Arts – 2 articles deleted – 03:15, 9 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
This film has not had a theatrical release nor has it an IMDb listing. The attached external link leads to a personal website for the creator of the film. It is possible that the article was started by the filmmaker. I have tagged the article but I have not reported in this area of wikipedia before so my apologies if I have done any of this in error. Also this may be an entirely legitimate entry so again apologies for taking up your time, but, due to my unfamiliarity in this area, I thought that this was something that should be looked into. MarnetteD | Talk 11:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
A second look at the page for the film above showed a link to the Stoke-on-Trent production company listed here. Its page has no external links and the page seems to be there for the sole purpose of advertising the Out of Space film that is already in question so I have tagged it with the COI2 tag also. Thank you for looking into this. MarnetteD | Talk 14:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Article Neuroliminal Training – Deleted – 08:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Dynamic Submission (1) – Userfied – 03:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Dynamic Submission (1)→ See also: Dynamic Submission article deletion review: Wikipedia:Deletion review#8 June 2007
The user states that he works for Dynamic Software, the company that makes Dynamic Submission software. [6] He is the only editor to have worked on the Dynamic Submission article. The user also appears to hold some sort of grudge against the professional search engine marketing industry. He has nominated search engine marketing for deletion, which I have vigorously opposed. He has also nominated Search Engine Land, the leading news site for this industry, for deletion. It is no secret that professional search engine marketers tell clients to avoid software like Dynamic Submission. Search engine marketing currently ranks 1st in Google for the valuable search terms "search engine marketing", 2nd in Google for the search term "search engine optimization." I am concerned that this user may have a commercial interest in deleting this page so that pages supporting submission software will rise in the rankings. I believe this user should be investigated as a single purpose COI account, and that his AfD nominations [7] [8] should be reviewed by an administrator who is fully aware of the facts. Jehochman Talk 06:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC) Jehochman, you are unbelievable, because I want you to merge this article, and I think the search engine land article is drivel you have decided to attack an article that I wrote. Cute. The only problem is you are mis-representing information. The company I work for Dynamic Software's article was already removed and has nothing to do with Dynamic Submission. Dynamic Submission is a software program that was written by Apex Pacific, not dynamic software. This program is sold by hundreds and hundreds of companies, and unlike your article is referenced in actual books that can be purchased in a book store. Nextly, the company I work for is AKC, which sells products that do SEO & SEM work, Dynamic Software is a company that I also work for, and as you will note, I sent a request to write an article for Dynamic Software before I wrote it! This has nothing to do with this product article that is notable. I have nothing against SEO SEM or any agenda. I am trying to help create a good en.wikipedia.org and I could say you should be investigated for wrting drivel. I have nothing against other articles you wrote, but being a good editor means pointing out error in others work. --Akc9000 12:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
User:Akc9000 and I have been discussing this and seem to have reached an understanding. Can an admin please copy the deleted article Dynamic Submission into my User:Jehochman/Sandbox so we can work on it? Once that is done, this case is resolved. Jehochman Talk 15:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Dynamic Submission (2) – Article deleted & salted, user blocked indefinitely – 08:24, 19 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Dynamic Submission (2)→ See also: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 13#Dynamic Submission
This user has been playing me for a fool. I had tried to help him restore NPOV to this article, after he said that he had no COI. Upon checking the domain name registration records, I see that he is intimately involved with this software. (IP location: "New Jersey - East Brunswick - Akc Consulting") Full disclosure: I first became acquinted with this editor when he nominated search engine marketing for deletion. I opposed that action strongly. Under the circumstances, this user should be considered for an indef block as an abusive account. I've already nominated the article for speedy. It should be salted to prevent recreation. Jehochman Talk 22:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I agree: the article should be deleted and salted and User Akc9000 blocked. — Athaenara ✉ 22:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm... You know Jehochman you are an outright liar! If you look at the deletion review log, you wll see that I told everyone in deletion review that I owned one website that sells/maintains this product. So what? There are thousands of people that sell this product! I own an ISP, I do not own the company that made this product. You are just looking at everything I write and causing problems for me because I had your article afd. Well I will tell you know, if you wrote it right, I would not have complained. I was upfront and honest with everyone. Deletion review stated that COI does not prevent me from writing an article if I am non-partial. Let me tell you. I know why you are doing this! I finally figured it out. You cannot stand products like this because you charge customers money for what program does for free. No I did not blank the article for that reason. That artcle justy came out of deletion review and you started manipulating it to state that products like this do not work. Again, because you are in this field and these type of products make you lose money. You should be ashamed of yourself telling me I am violating COI, you are twisting things to your advantage and you employed sockpuppets to get your way. What is it with you? You are following all my edits that have anything to do with your line of work and causing problems. You should be banned from Wiki for this! --Akc9000 01:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
I deleted Search engine submission software and recreated it as a protected redirect to Search engine submission and indef blocked User:Akc9000 for repeated COI violations and personal attacks. --Akhilleus (talk) 15:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Christopher B. Reeves and Gabrielle Reeves – Resolved. – 08:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Both of these articles were created by LostSentiment who also uploaded Image:Chrisreeves.jpg claiming to have created it himself. The image page contains a non-working link to an image hosting site. Neither bio looks anywhere near notable to me. Inexplicably, an administrator has removed the speedy delete tag from the "Gabrielle" article saying that it satisfies notability. Please note that both Christopher Reeves and Christopher reeves now redirect to Christopher Bennett Reeves and should redirect to Christopher Reeve, the actor who played Superman, as a misspelling if these bios are deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steven J. Anderson (talk • contribs) 01:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| College of Micronesia-FSM – Resolved. – 08:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
College of Micronesia-FSM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - User with same name as the article has created a rather biased article about a school. I have reverted the removal of my tagging and removing of external links in the text etc. User has also uploaded clearly copyvios claiming GFDL. --Rettetast 12:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
The article has been cleaned up and may no longer be a problem. — Athaenara ✉ 09:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Marsh Engle – Article deleted – 11:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Marsh EngleI have tagged Marsh Engle as a badly-written autobiography, which has been copied verbatim from a user's page. This is the worst violation of the rules and the English language I've seen here in months. Bearian 20:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| User Marcfiszman – Resolved. – 16:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
User MarcfiszmanMarcfiszman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) introduced in the beginning a couple of links to nearthwort.com:
Some time later the links were changed to an mp3-file somewhere else on that server. In his latest edits, the links were changed from nearthwort.com to marcfiszman.com.
I removed all the links added by Marcfiszman, and gave the user a welcome message and a coi1-warning, as it seems that the editor is involved in the website. He responded on my talkpage with a question, and I explained the situation. Apparently Marcfiszman thinks my removal is overzealous, and he started to reinsert the link to marcfizman again. Link addition is reverted. --Dirk Beetstra T C 23:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Nick Palumbo – Resolved. – 16:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Both users (who I believe to be the same person due to the consistency and similarity of their edits) are using an article with no sources that reads more like a fluff piece than anything else that clearly violates WP:BLP. An example of this article can be found here. Here are some examples of the prose found in the article... This was as gentle as a droplet of rain compared to the maelstrom to come with his next slasher film. ... and the life long film purist would enjoy every minute working with the same material his idol Stanley Kubrick had worked with during his illustrious career. However this time, going to Hell would not be easy, and the hard part would be ever leaving. Palumbo was ready for the accolades from the horror craving fans of modern cinema blood thirsty for even greater cinematic depravities It seemed everyone involved with the film were ashamed with their involvement and hoped that it would simply go away. Everyone that is except for Nick Palumbo. This was his dream, and he was not going to let it go down without a fight. And so on...and so forth...either the person writing this article is Palumbo himself, one of his shills or a hugely biased fan. Other editors and I have managed to trim the article down to a stub but the users in question often revert to their previous edits.--CyberGhostface 00:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| James W. Sperman – Two articles deleted. – 16:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
James W. Sperman→ See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James W. Sperman
Autobiographical and COI editing by a restaurant founder about himself and his businesses. RJASE1 Talk 02:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Bill Dunlap – Resolved on Afd. – 16:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
see also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Dunlap and this request for editor assistance |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Doniach family articles – Resolved. – 16:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Doniach family articles
Unreferenced stub biographical articles written by a relative. RJASE1 Talk 19:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Ameer Abro – Article deleted – 13:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
→ See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ameer Abro
Unreferenced autobiography. RJASE1 Talk 19:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Drawloop – Article deleted – 13:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
→ See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drawloop
Apparent company-produced PR for a software product. RJASE1 Talk 20:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Resolved: Article is getting slaughtered on AFD. YechielMan 00:16, 11 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Across Five Aprils (band) – Inactive. – 21:02, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Would appreciate input from other editors on how to proceed - currently the article isn't sourced. Addhoc 21:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Tania Chen – Inactive. – 21:02, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Apparent autobiographical editing. RJASE1 Talk 23:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Joseph Hilbe – Inactive. – 21:02, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
Jhilbe (talk · contribs) and Joehilbe (talk · contribs) (probably the same person) creator and primary article editor. The only contributions of these users is to this article. RJASE1 Talk 04:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Sunpendulum – Resolved. – 21:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
→ See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunpendulum
Art project article apparently written by the project managers. RJASE1 Talk 19:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
There are links to a variety of press reports to be found at http://www.sunpendulum.at/-media-reports.html Or here is a list of everything I could find: .... * Sunpendulum 18:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC) → (Removed very long posted list* of links copied from sunpendulum website.) — Athaenara ✉ 21:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
In general, the COI single-purpose accounts have responded appropriately to policies and guidelines concerns, and the article's NPOV condition is now fair or better. — Athaenara ✉ 21:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Don Fernando – Resolved. – 22:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Autobiographical editing by article subject. RJASE1 Talk 14:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Zero edits by Special:Contributions/Donfernando since report. — Athaenara ✉ 22:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Douglas Wood – Resolved. – 22:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Attempted hijack of the Douglas Wood article with apparent autobiographical material about a different Douglas Wood (an entertainment executive). Reverted and warned. RJASE1 Talk 19:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Zero edits by Special:Contributions/Douglaswood since report. — Athaenara ✉ 22:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| John Trivers – Resolved. – 22:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Apparent autobiographical editing, also editing his wife's article. RJASE1 Talk 01:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Zero edits by Special:Contributions/Jptrivers since report. — Athaenara ✉ 22:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Cberlet / Dking – Editors each have personal/professional COI. Content dispute. – 22:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Cberlet / Dking
→ Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 2#Lyndon LaRouche
Cberlet and Dking are Chip Berlet and Dennis King, political activists who campaigned back in the 1980s for the jailing of Lyndon LaRouche. The two of them have started an edit war at the article Lyndon LaRouche, because they object to the inclusion in the intro of a quote from former Attorney General Ramsey Clark, who casts doubt on the legitimacy of the LaRouche trial. Quotes from Berlet and King are plentiful in the article, but the two of them seek to dominate content in violation of both WP:OWN and WP:COI. They are also engaged in abuse of Wikipedia for self-promotion -- Dking was featured earlier on this noticeboard for linkspamming (see this],) and Cberlet is engaged in similar activity. --Don't lose that number 06:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
There is certainly an issue with the two editors' personal and professional conflicts of interest. This noticeboard has had little or no success in dealing with them. — Athaenara ✉ 22:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Leanne Pooley – Resolved. – 00:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Article created by SpacificFilms (talk · contribs), which is the above person's production company. RJASE1 Talk 04:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC) Edits by Special:Contributions/SpacificFilms ceased after report. — Athaenara ✉ 00:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Peter Nehr – Resolved. – 00:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
User:Anitanehr, the article's main author, is the subject's wife. She says that she was "assigned to establish the Wikipedia listing for my husband" (see User talk:Anitanehr). This raises an obvious WP:COI issue, as well as issues under WP:BLP. No WP:RS is cited, which implicates WP:NOR. Further, there is no indication that this first-term Florida legislator is WP:NOTE, although the fact that he is an elected state legislator may be sufficient to justify a WP article about him (it would not get him into Encyclopedias Britannica or Americana). Finell (Talk) 18:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| FFB Recordings – Article deleted & salted. – 00:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
FFB RecordingsI noticed this one because of the many COIBot alerts this account apparently already collected (. The producer goes by the name Dean Woodward AKA 'Big Dean', 'Grizzly B', or 'Care Bear'
I am not sure if they are related, but the accounts Deanwoodward (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Carebear (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Bigdean (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) do exist, though they do not have any (visible) edits in their contribution lists (suggesting the articles they created/edited have already been removed). --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Article deleted and protected against re-creation. Edits by Special:Contributions/FFB Recordings ceased after report. — Athaenara ✉ 00:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| William J. Murray – Resolved. – 00:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Autobiographical editing and self-promotion. RJASE1 Talk 13:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Edits by Special:Contributions/Wjmurray ceased after report. — Athaenara ✉ 00:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Douglas Carswell – Inactive. – 03:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Possible autobiographical editing by a British MP. RJASE1 Talk 16:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Dylan Verrechia – Inactive. – 03:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
The majority of edits of this article are done by an editor with the name User:Dylanverrechia. Most of the editors edits in Dylan Verrechia, Tijuana, and Tijuana Makes Me Happy seem more like advertising for his movie than anything else. XinJeisan 22:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC) I am unsure if the Dylan Verrechia is notable or not, so I put on the notability tag, however the editor User:Dylanverrechia removed the tag. I don't have anything against this person, and his movie seems to be quite good and important, but he shouldn't be using Wikipedia for advertising for himself. XinJeisan 17:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
User:Jameslefkowitz, who has a user name which is the same as the one listed as a producer for Mr. Verrechia, has deleted the COI and notability templates on Dylan Verrechia without comment.XinJeisan 17:40, 4 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Avatar Records – Inactive. – 03:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
The above user is the author and primary editor. Something strange going on also with insertion and removal of criticism, and legal issues. RJASE1 Talk 12:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Orient Thai Airlines – Resolved. – 03:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Apparent PR editing by company rep. RJASE1 Talk 13:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Blocked, indefinitely, along with Fly12go (talk · contribs). May return, so leaving this open for a while. MER-C 12:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Cogswell College – Inactive. – 03:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
A few anonymous editors (and even an editor who don't sign in) seem to be making the article into a PR page. I have added a POV-check stamp on the page. I'm assuming they are not signing in, so they won't be identified, if they are part of the college.--Joel Lindley 03:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Ragging – Resolved. – 05:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
Noraggingfoundation (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/UserReports/Noraggingfoundation and Noragging (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/UserReports/Noragging are performing POV edits on Ragging. Amongst the edits are adding links to their own organisation, deleting information (with references; diff). Some of the edits are really strange, adding facts with fact-tags (diff), or several {{db-spam}} tags diff and undirected attack remarks: diff.
Two IPs who may be involved:
--Dirk Beetstra T C 18:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC) The links deleted were generated not for reference ( each one takes to a single site www.noragging.com/... )but for increasing their traffic. Ragging in India is a serious problem that has taken at least 22 lives since 2000. It has also left hundreds injured and many more have been brutally tortured. Even before the recent order of the Honbl. Supreme Court of India, several organizations were formed by volunteers to stand against ragging. CURE, Stopragging and No Ragging Foundation are those organizations. Some organizations like CURE, that runs only online works, has earned much site traffic to their site from wikipedia... whereas No Ragging Foundation has kept itself busy with activities like helping victims or like organizing awareness drives. Now some volunteers want to let people know that organizations like the No Ragging Foundation is providing Real support to victims, as far as possible... this would help many victims and/or families. But repeated, intentional and jealous attacks on the information and links provided by the No Ragging Foundation is really unfortunate. If Wikipedia considers it to be spam, so is Coalition to Uproot Ragging from Education (CURE)... but when it is found that No Ragging Foundation links are replaced by CURE links... it is really unfortunate acts of jealousy. Warm regards, Noragging 19:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)NoRagging |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| User:Danngala – Resolved. – 05:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
I have fired a warning shot over COI & SPAM, plus copyvio of images and text might well be an issue. See bottom here re name, and here re text of Gustave Baumann. contributions here. The gallery also covers Hayter. Incidentally I don't have an issue with the notability of GB. Johnbod 00:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Overton Loyd – Resolved. – 05:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
→ See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overton Loyd
Extensive autobiographical editing by article subject. RJASE1 Talk 21:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| New urbanism edits by marketing person – Resolved. – 05:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
New urbanism edits by a marketing person
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Gerson therapy – Inactive. – 23:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
Article on controversial therapy being edited by Gerson's grandson, biographer and promoter. Tearlach 21:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
No COI edits or edit warring since 5 June. — Athaenara ✉ 23:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Trax FM – Inactive. – 23:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
→ See also: Trax FM (section 18) in COI/N Archive 9
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| User Catanich (2) – Inactive. – 23:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
User Catanich (2)→ See also: User Catanich (1) (section #20) in COI/N Archive 8
This user was previously indef-blocked for writing promotional articles as a business, with an indef-block notice on the user page. Received the following comment:
Did a quick Google search on "Catanich Internet Marketing" and notice that there are various other references to our action. I am amenable to restoring the status quo ante on this one if possible/appropriate (so long as the outfit doesn't provide paid services involving Wikipedia) but would appreciate input on how to proceed here. --Shirahadasha 04:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I have left a note offering this option in User talk:Catanich#Your request to unblock --Shirahadasha 17:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
How/where was this resolved? — Athaenara ✉ 14:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC) I would like to appoligize to Wiki for continuing to edit, but since the Wiki Editors continue to use my name in their article, comments and aggressive statements, I feel you should know what effects it has had on me. May I please state that you have now cost me my job from the company I was working for as their employee (Not the one they continue to reference). Both User:Butseriouslyfolks and User:Shirahadasha never took the time to verify their facts as being accurate or truthful. Senior editors should review this incident because these editors have used the Wiki as a weapon against some one and has harmed him greatly. Wiki, how can you be so unhuman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.164.87 (talk • contribs)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Raritan Computer – Inactive. – 23:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
→ See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raritan Computer (result was keep)
|
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Charles Bennison – Resolved. – 23:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
|
→ See also: Charles Bennison section in BLP/N Archive 18
Charles Bennison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - User:Barbaraalton is apparently* under the employ of the church and been tasked to eliminate negative information in this biography[15] - an activity she has undertaken repeatedly.[16]. She's received several talk page warnings.
No edits by Special:Contributions/Barbaraalton since 31 hour block on 14 June. — Athaenara ✉ 23:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |
| Arthur W. (Nick) Arundel – Inactive. – 23:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above Please do not modify it. |
I suspect this article is being written/edited by a relative. RJASE1 Talk 02:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
No edits by Special:Contributions/Tarundel in past two weeks. — Athaenara ✉ 23:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
| The above is an archived debate of the possible conflict of interest related to the article above. Please do not modify it. |