Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 March 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

10 March 2011[edit]

Completed

SCV for 2011-03-10 Edit

2011-03-10 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Deleted and recreated clean. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:47, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. OTRS pending for removed material. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:30, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. The link redirects to Wikipedia. Minimac (talk) 07:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:34, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)[edit]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:49, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Green tickY Template was removed out of process; the copyvio remains. I have blanked the article again and am relisting, after explaining to the new contributor that this must not happen again. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:47, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Backwardscopy. Tag and explanation placed at talk page. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. The IP copied it from them; it was cited in his second edit. The content has been removed, with explanations at the articles' talk pages. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:18, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:26, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:10, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:14, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Red XN No source found; it's all been rewritten anyway, so not adding cv-unsure to talk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • On initial review, I'm not seeing it, but I don't have time to review it in depth at the moment and the new lovely tool won't let me scan a deleted file, I'm sure. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • I was thinking of adding an upload function for this kind of thing but wasn't quite sure how to work it in. You can at least temporarily upload the file to a web location then delete it afterwards. Dcoetzee 21:21, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • The "Upgrades" section appears to be page 69 of the source, with only a few cosmetic changes in wording and order. I've removed it. The rest of the article looks clean; I spot-checked a few bits of text to the source and found nothing. It's possible they are copyvios of other sources, however. Cheers. lifebaka++ 23:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • Uploaded a temp copy to my S3, see report at [2]. Current rev looks clean to me, with respect to that source. Dcoetzee 05:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • Wow; thanks both of you! We can mark this resolved, and I'll speak to the contributor about the probable slight Wikipedia:Plagiarism issue with the U.S. Ordnance Spec Sheets, which can be easily addressed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:16, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]