Wikipedia:Editor review/Leonard^Bloom

Leonard^Bloom

Leonard^Bloom (talk · contribs) UPDATE: I love the reviews I have received, and the kind words were wonderful. I'm going to keep this up, just to hear more things I can do to help (that's a horrible lie; I just want to hear "We love you Leonard!" as many times as possible).

Reviews

• Taking a focus on article-writing (and the subject you enjoy covering!) would help broaden your experience on Wikipedia and make it more rewarding. New stubs can become Did You Know candidates, and if you're game enough, go for a featured article. Keep up on your vandal-patrolling, though! - Mailer Diablo 15:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

• Read up on WP:CSD and WP:N more, and get a better idea of what is considered encyclopedic. I've only seen a bit of your speedy work, but it's not very good. Wizardman 02:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

• You've done an excellent job with your huggle reverts. Keep it up!--Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 22:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

• Mainspace is good (but should add edit summaries more often ;-) ); I don't hang around XfD enough to comment on that. I agree with Mailer diablo that it's good to expand your horizons. I'd like to see how you do in a dispute, and maybe how you solve one :-) Xavexgoem (talk) 03:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

• I know you're a WikiGnome, but I suggest that you try to focus on article-building a bit more. You're Huggle reverts are phenomenal, but (especially if you want to be an admin) a lot of editors would prefer to see more content-adding and a little less vandal-reversion. Also, try to edit more in the Project: space, that always helps. Cheers, and good luck! --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 18:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

• Take it easy on the Huggle and do some real editing. 71.112.10.248 (talk) 05:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

• I have enjoyed your contributions to the AfD discussions, and you have a good eye for spotting articles that deserve to get Speedy Deleted. Keep up the fine work. Ecoleetage (talk) 21:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

• While I tried to delete what was obviously a fake fact and a joke from a page, Leonard^Bloom told me twice that I was vandalising. Please take the time to read what I was deleting! The page was The Mighty B!. I was trying to do some good by deleting the section titled DVR Controversy. However, Leonard^Bloom told me that I was vandalising! Please visit this page, and you will see that I was just trying to do the right thing! This will not redirect you anywhere, I promise! Just please, go and see for yourself! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.37.99.67 (talk • contribs)

• Good work on reverting vandalism and tagging speedy deletions. However, please be a bit more careful with Huggle, because there have been several instances of treating good faith edits as vandalism (e.g. [1]). --UberScienceNerd _{Talk Contributions} 20:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

UPDATED ANSWERS: I enjoyed finishing up the work the I did on Frederic Porter Vinton, and I'm really proud of myself for that. I've also greatly expanded Big Stick Ideology and I'm looking forward to moving past that project (my librarians are starting to wonder who that kid who comes in and asks for books on Diplomacy and the history of is). I've also improved references and added quite a few external links to articles, which is something I enjoy doing.

1. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

UPDATED ANSWERS: No conflicts, mainly because I don't join into as many conversations as I should. Oh well.