Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 5

< September 4	September 6 >

September 5[edit]

File:DJ IQ and Asaviour wearing Dilate.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopaedic value, questionable licensing releases. Added by SPA COI to promote clothing brand Rayman60 (talk) 03:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:7th World Rover Moot Badge.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo, but claimed as self (user photo)? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WEZRAMFM.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ★ Bigr Tex 18:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Querying Non-free status as textlogo? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:17, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks Textlogo to me AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 17:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs more opinion - it's a heavily stylized logo and the guidance on commons:COM:TOO indicates such things as borderline.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing status updated to PD-logo. Discussion should be fine to be closed now. As a United States-based radio station the logo could potentially be moved to Commons now. Salavat (talk) 03:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Louisiana State University (seal).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 06:13, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louisiana State University (seal).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

its set for deleted because they have been uploading on wikimedia commons 104.243.165.53 (talk) 01:22, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The license of the Commons file is questionable and I've tagged it for deletion. Relisting in the meantime so that this doesn't fall between the cracks.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:23, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Image has been nominated for deletion at Commons and will likely be deleted as it fails to qualify for PD-logo and no evidence can be found regarding the logos age. Salavat (talk) 03:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note, Image has now been deleted on Commons. Salavat (talk) 09:25, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reece Leonard Outside.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unused, no value whatsoever, uploader (myself) wants it deleted. Anonymous5454 16:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Delete, per uploader. Reh man 23:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mother and child sculpture by Sushma Shimkhada.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3-dimensional artwork. No FOP in Nepal (c:COM:FOP#Nepal). Would require a release from the sculptor. Majora (talk) 22:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bronze Sculpture by Sushma Shimkhada.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3-dimensional artwork. No FOP in Nepal (c:COM:FOP#Nepal). Would require a release from the sculptor. Majora (talk) 22:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Passion for Fashion Book Cover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Used on an article that is not the source of commentary. An image of the book would be acceptable on an article about the book. Not on the article about the author. Majora (talk) 23:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.