Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 June 13

< June 12	June 14 >

June 13[edit]

File:Quebec Capitales cap.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:10, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2021_June_5#Files_in_Category:Cap_logos was recently closed as keep, partially due to the large number of files listed. While I think that baseball cap logos are generally acceptable as a valid, widely-used alternate logo, in this specific case, the cap logo is almost identical to the standard logo. As a result, I believe that this is one of the few cap logos from the previous discussion to fail WP:NFCC #3a (minimal number of items), as there are no significant differences between this one and the standard logo. Hog Farm _Talk 03:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the old discussion - duplicate or near-duplicate cap logos do not help with identification, and I agree NFCC #3a applies. SportingFlyer T·C 22:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sculture on the esplanade of Espace Léopold.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:10, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Belgium has Commons-acceptable FOP since 2016, and this fair use file which is a redundant duplicate of File:Sculture by the European Parliament 1.jpg is no longer needed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.