Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 October 2

< October 1	October 3 >

October 2[edit]

File:Map of The Philippines with CIBI branches.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Apparently based on an unspecified file on Commons and files on Commons often require attributing the author, but this is not possible if the file can't be identified. Stefan2 (talk) 09:23, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 03:33, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chasing the horizon.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

“

What is not permitted 👎

   Photos cannot be sold without significant modification.
   Compiling photos from Unsplash to replicate a similar or competing service.

”

This is unfree as there are restrictions on commercial use of unmodified copies and on the commercial use of competing services. Stefan2 (talk) 09:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Unsplash images were under a CC0 license until 5 June 2017. Depending on when this image was made available this might be CC0 or it might be on the restrictive Unsplash license. Unfortunately, the source is a direct link to the image and not to the image page with description that might show the upload date. If the image can be established to be uploaded prior to the license change, it can be kept, otherwise it must be deleted. See c:Template:Unsplash. -- Whpq (talk) 17:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't know that. Note that the file was uploaded to Wikipedia in 2015, which was before 2017. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I have now moved the file to Commons, see c:File:Chasing the horizon.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joe James, Brentford FC, 1930s.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use for Joe James (footballer) only, remove all other instances. ✗plicit 13:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Flickr account holder is unlikely to be the copyright holder. Stefan2 (talk) 09:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Can this be turned into a non-free image for the James article? Number 5 7 12:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Store Display, Ruben's Department Store, Augusta, Georgia.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source and authorship information were added by Sfan00 IMG (talk · contribs) in Special:Diff/560663803, but it is unclear where he got the information from. Stefan2 (talk) 09:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Queen Jamaica tour 1966.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image is not the subject of significant sourced commentary failing WP:NFCC#8. the stated purpose to show "[t]he independence of the Jamaican monarchy from the British monarchy." can be done via sourced text and doe not require an image, so fails WP:NFCC#1. Whpq (talk) 12:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Map of Province of Miss Dominican Republic World 2006.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:33, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 03:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Queen Jamaica Parliament.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's the Queen sat in a chair. There are numerous free equivalents available showing her in a fancy gown and jewelry. Fails WP:NFCC #1, #5 and #8. DrKay (talk) 14:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This non-free image is used to show "[t]he functions and duties of the Jamaican monarch" but that is explained in the text so this fails WP:NFCC#1. Removal will not detract from understanding the topic and the image itself is not the subject of significant sourced commentary failing WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 16:38, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Queen of Barbados and her Consort, 1977.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's the queen and her husband sat on chairs. Fails WP:NFCC #1, #5 and #8. There are numerous free equivalents of them wearing similar clothes in similar circumstances. DrKay (talk) 14:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There is no clear stated purpose in the misnamed section "Fair use rationale for Monarchy of Barbados". I suppose the vague "This image is a non-fictional photograph documenting a historical moment" might be considered a purpose. As used in the article, it is entirely decorative. -- Whpq (talk) 02:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Queen Jamaica Banknote.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Despite there being a section titles "Fair use rationale for Monarchy of Jamaica", there is no actual articulated purpose for the use of this image. The presence of a bank note in the article appears to be entirely decorative as there is nothing about in the article text beyond a caption identifying the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 16:41, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barbados Queen Diamond Jubilee 2012.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image is four stamps used to "... illustrate the role of the monarchy of Barbados". There is a single sentence mentioning that the Queen appears on stamps and is sourced directly to the Barbados postal service. The usage fails WP:NFCC#8, and the text is able convey that the Queen appears on stamps so also fails WP:NFCC#1. Being four stamps, it also fails WP:NFCC#3a. Whpq (talk) 17:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BosJigSaw.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot of a jigsaw puzzle game. No indication of the software or photograph's license. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:37, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muhammad Usman Malik.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overwritten file. The current revision is a copyvio from here: [1] Stefan2 (talk) 22:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:37, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.