Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Colonel Warden/Event admission

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Basically per Kudpung. Users have considerable leeway in deciding what to keep in their own userspace. 182.65.242.2 (talk) 01:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Colonel Warden/Event admission[edit]

This is an 2 year old draft of a short article that looks more like a disambiguation page. I don't think it's useful, and either should be moved to Wikitionary or deleted. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Event management and studies are significant disciplines covered by sources such as Sport Facility and Event Management. Admission facilities, pricing, and systems are naturally part of this and so the topic has potential. Per WP:DEADLINE, there is no timetable for this and so this nomination is disruptive. Andrew D. (talk) 00:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - overzealous cleaning up of apparently stale user space drafts. Warden now edits as Andrew Davidson and is probably well aware of what he has in his userspace(s). --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Let me correct my nomination. It has been 2 years since the draft has been edited by the author and this draft is from 2005, making it a 10 year draft. See WP:STALEDRAFT. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does that really matter? Do we have to do such clean ups just because guidelines say we can? Davidson is a regular editor, not someone who has breezed in 10 years ago, dropped a draft, and cleared off never to return. Would you like to start a purge on all my sub pages too? --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Please look at the other reason for this nomination. This article doesn't look to be useful, and looks more suitable for Wikitionary. However, I've just checked Wikitionary and there's already a definition for admission there. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.