Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jooler/List of films about possessed or sentient inanimate objects
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . Will undelete if the user requests, but we are not an indefinite host for deleted content. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
User:Jooler/List of films about possessed or sentient inanimate objects[edit]
- User:Jooler/List of films about possessed or sentient inanimate objects (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Original article deleted at AFD nearly ten years ago. The last non-vandalism edit was four years ago, and the last edit by the editor was six years ago. Calton | Talk 01:32, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Blank {{Inactive userpage blanked}}. Harmless, project-related, reasonable leeway for an editor (was productive 8 years ago), vs WP:Alternative outlets and WP:NOR. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:05, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I'm seeing this as a indiscriminate collection of information. Legacypac (talk) 02:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- You mean to refer to Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information? If so, I disagree with you there, there is definitely a common plot device common to the list films, as per the title. It is not indiscriminate. Further, Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information is intended (soft rule) to refer to collections of indiscriminate information off-wikipedia. This page is all wiki-links. If it helps the user to contribute to the project by connecting existing article content, good for him, that is what userspace is available for. The main concern is that the page is intended for mainspace, which is what the AfD, which suggests this should be deleted per WP:UP#COPIES. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.