Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 11

< January 10	January 12 >

January 11[edit]

File:Amaroglass.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amaroglass.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Only released under an Attribution-NoDerivs license—not free enough for Wikipedia—on Flickr, as stated in the e-mail given on the description page. —innotata 00:20, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HavenLogo1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HavenLogo1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Non-free logo which does not qualify to be {{PD-textlogo}} Sreejith K (talk) 06:48, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Charlie Chaplin Studios (2009).jpg + File:Jim Henson Company front gate.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:44, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charlie Chaplin Studios (2009).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Jim Henson Company front gate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Derivative work of a statue from 2000. According to the article: "At a ceremony in June 2000, the Henson Company unveiled a 12-foot (3.7 m) color statue of Kermit the Frog, dressed as Chaplin's "Little Tramp," above the studio's main gate." MGA73 (talk) 08:01, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charlie Chaplin Studios (2009).jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 08:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:UNIPAN.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:UNIPAN.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Non-free logo of a University Sreejith K (talk) 12:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rick stockstill mtsu.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rick stockstill mtsu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Very suspicious image. Web resolution with professional quality composition and focus. Looks like a newspaper photo from a postgame photo. No EXIF. It just doesn't match. GrapedApe (talk) 13:18, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Orphans japan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orphans japan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Copyvio from http://www.kaze-net.org/rep_touch_e may pass as fair use Bulwersator (talk) 17:43, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Scottish Pancakes - Perfect.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scottish Pancakes - Perfect.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Copyrighted packaging? MGA73 (talk) 19:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1cityring.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1cityring.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This ring is a 3-D Artwork and it's copyright is held by the creator not the photo taker. It fall under the rules of Wikipedia:Public_domain#Artworks. Therefore the current copyright tag (ie. {{PD-self}}) is incorrect. The correct license tag is Template:Non-free 3D art, making image Non-free. Since this image appears only on one list, 3 user pages, and one template, it fail WP:NFC #9: (ie "Restrictions on location. Non-free content is allowed only in articles") so image should be deleted, as image is not allowed on the pages it is currently on. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 19:33, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Er, lists are articles. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Johnshall.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johnshall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

possible copy of http://dwars.radio6.nl/files/2011/11/John-S-Hall.jpg MorganKevinJ^(talk) 19:37, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Old trafford stadium.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Worm That Turned (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old trafford stadium.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image of 3D model created here. Cloudbound (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I made it on Sketchup and uploaded it to Wikipedia. It's OK to do that, isn't it? Rcsprinter (yak) 16:45, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Rcsprinter has confirmed that this was incorrect - have deleted the file. Worm^TT · (talk) 16:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:2000-W Library of Congress Bimetallic rev.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000-W Library of Congress Bimetallic rev.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

First: to be honest, I'm not sure of this one. I'm a bit confused, so please forgive me if I'm wrong about this one. If I am, please tell me and I will removed is PUF listing immediately.

The reason I listed this is that this image appears on the United States Mint page. The {{money-US}} license, regarding images from the U.S. Mint says:

Important Copyright Information (Is this really PD?): "Certain coins contain copyrights licensed to the U.S. Mint and owned by third parties or assigned to and owned by the U.S. Mint [1]. For the United States Mint circulating coin design use policy, see [2]; for the policy on the 50 State Quarters, see [3]. For images of these coins, a fair use license template and rationale must be used.

Going to the "United States Mint Circulating Coin Design Use Policy" pages listed on in the "US-Money" template it says:

"PLEASE NOTE: This policy does not cover use of the design of any coin not specifically defined above as a Covered Coin."

As far as I can tell this coin is not listed a "Covered Coin" (see list in first paragraph) just like the 50 State Quarters are not listed. Do this not mean that the, just like for the 50 State Quarters, the rule "For images of these coins, a fair use license template and rationale must be use" applies? --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 20:29, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Omar Sharif Lawrence of Arabia.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Omar Sharif Lawrence of Arabia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Uploaded as PD - published in US between 1923 and 1977 without a copyright notice. As a screenshot from a film trailer, I would expect this to be copyrighted. Cloudbound (talk) 21:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Originalnikeswoosh-trademarkia-trademark-1972.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Originalnikeswoosh-trademarkia-trademark-1972.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Nike trademarked the image in 1972, therefore I believe the licence used is incorrect. Cloudbound (talk) 21:29, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PennyandWolf.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PennyandWolf.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Per the deletion discussion on Commons here, I do not believe the uploader is the copyright holder. Cloudbound (talk) 23:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.