Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 5[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 5, 2022.

Talk page stalking[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Cross-namespace redirects indicates that "the general consensus seems to be that most newly created cross-namespace redirects from the main (article) namespace to the Wikipedia (project) namespace should be deleted", and in this case I agree. I think a reader accidentally "falling through the cracks" onto the humour page would violate Principle of least astonishment. –xenotalk 23:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nomination. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:49, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. The cross-namespace redirects to project space that get consensus to keep are (almost) all those which are helpful for very new users who we can't be certain understand namespaces yet. The concept of talk page stalkers is not one that falls into that category. Thryduulf (talk) 07:57, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per Thryduulf. Frankly, there's a speedy deletion criterion for this sort of thing, so WP:IAR keeping these sorts of things requires a very good reason. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:59, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Article to Wikipedia: redirects are explicitly excluded from the speedy deletion criterion (R2) so there is no IAR involved. Thryduulf (talk) 14:41, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as unhelpful for newbies. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 16:43, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all: this is an unhelpful use of XNR. TartarTorte 16:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per above policies; I also feel this has just about reached the SNOW stage. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 20:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep:Well then. It seems that 'Delete all', is popular. I, as a newbie, actually felt these were helpful, but if not, then so be it. TY. — Moops ⋠T⋡ 21:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete these unnecessary cross-namespace redirects. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sveringes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a misspelling of the genetive form of the Swedish name for Sweden (Sveriges). It's received only 2 views this year, which backs up Google results that this isn't a common spelling error. Thryduulf (talk) 21:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as implausible typo on English Wikipedia due to it being a typo of a Swedish word. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 07:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as implausible typo AND an implausible search term. After all, the correct spelling and even Sweden's are not a redirects. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 20:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ballet Caravan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is misleading and needs to be deleted. Although Ballet Caravan and NYC Ballet were both founded by Lincoln Kirstein, they were neither related to each other nor was the latter a successor to the former. Ballet Caravan was disbanded in 1941; NYC Ballet was established in 1948. This fact is confirmed in various reputable sources, including this abstract from Dance Research Journal and NYC Ballet's entry on Kirstein. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Totaljerkface[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:45, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't quite understand this redirect, apparently http://www.totaljerkface.com is a source used for some citations on this article but I don't see the relevance of the term "Totaljerkface" to this game enough that readers would be using it to try to find this article. Liz Read! Talk! 21:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Totaljerkface.com is the only website where the game is officially hosted (i.e. the game's official website). The site is operated by the game's developer (Fancy Force) and Happy Wheels is one of only two games on it. It also serves as the developer's blog, including updates for the game. I'm not sure whether the redirect has encyclopedic value but, if kept, Happy Wheels is the only plausible target as neither Fancy Force nor the other game (Divine Intervention) is notable. IceWelder [✉] 21:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thanks IceWelder, I appreciate the explanation. That information should probably go into the article. I'll let this discussion run in case anyone thinks this is not a useful redirect to keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The official website for this game is listed in the article, albeit in the external links section. If we want to add the link to the infobox, we could, but I don't think that its current absence from the infobox affects my decision. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:01, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Reflex Blue[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pantone color that was mentioned at blue but is not currently mentioned at blue other than a passing mention as the blue in the EU flag in a caption for the EU flag. There are a lot of other passing mentions of this color on wikipedia, but nothing that seems to actually describe the color. It seems like there should probably be a section added to Shades of blue called Reflex Blue, but it's not currently there. TartarTorte 19:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete since the color is not mentioned at target, so no need for keeping. CycloneYoris talk! 23:47, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sonic 2K6[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Sonic 2K6

Sonic the Hedgehog (next-gen)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Sonic the Hedgehog (next-gen)

"##:00" redirects[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#"##:00" redirects

Count Dooku's Clone[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Page history has no significance. These never should have been made in the first place. Delete. TNstingray (talk) 17:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - a google search shows that this relates to a character featured only in fan fiction. Not mentioned at target and unhelpful. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 18:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Jard Dooku (a character existing only on a Star Wars fanfiction wiki, whose redirect's history consists mainly of redirecting and re-redirecting), and slightly weak delete the other two per nom and El cid. Their supposed character, from whom Jard could possibly be a separate character, had an article created in June 2005 that would be merged to List of Star Wars Separatist characters on March 3 the next year (see its most developed version here), before he was removed December 10 and that would be retargeted in October 2008. Count Dooku's Clone has some history that might be worth preserving, but a lot of it is what appears to be some fans' (and supposedly historians') "[Dooku]'s just hiding [until Luke Skywalker or another Jedi from the New Order tracked him down and killed him]" theories, a claim that's pretty questionable. On a side note, Godsy, who targeted the non-Jard ones to their current target, might want to weigh in as well regarding these histories. Regards, SONIC678 06:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Highway construction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Eh, whatever. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 15:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

I was about to WP:BOLDly retarget this to Highway since whatever about the subject of this redirect which needs to be found can probably be found at Highway, but ... I apparently forgot that I nominated this redirect for RFD in 2018, which resulted in this redirect's current target per consensus. So ... proposing retarget to Highway. Steel1943 (talk) 17:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as there is nothing in the Highway article about construction, but the current target deals with the construction of roads of all types. Thryduulf (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The current target is the most logical one given this section covers the relevant content. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf - Four years and still no reason given to change the target? "whatever about the subject of this redirect which needs to be found can probably be found at Highway" - well can it be found there or not? There is nothing about highway construction at Highway, meanwhile the current target is a section about road construction, so seems the most helpful to someone searching this. A7V2 (talk) 09:35, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Roads and Highways[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Roads and Highways

Fredericus 2.0[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's some usage of this term on social media, but it's not mentioned at the target and I can't find any usage in RS. Given that the original Operation Fredericus was a German campaign in WWII, I think it's a stretch to create this redirect in the absence of RS usage. signed, Rosguill talk 16:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Queen's speech[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why these two are unambiguous if King's speech and King's Speech aren't. The first four entries at the DAB are all ambiguous under a queen as well. I would suggest we retarget to King's speech; would also be open to the converse move, moving King's speech to King's speech (disambiguation) and retargeting the two king titles to Speech from the throne. If anyone's interested in doing it that way, please tag King's Speech and leave a note at Talk:King's speech. (Stray thought, probably best answered at WT:RfD: Should there be a "This DAB is implicated by an ongoing RfD" template?) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 14:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget as proposed. This seems to be the best solution to me. I don't think changing the DAB page would be useful, and there would be a plausible argument that the film would actually be the primary topic here rather than the actual speech. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:27, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree with the retargetting, given the recent change in the office-holder this mostly refers to. I wouldn't go so far as to say that the film is the primary topic, but i think it's what makes it be a disambiguation page rather than a hatnote. Morwen (talk) 16:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I think the primary topic is Speech from the throne, usually referring specifically to the British government's forthcoming legislative agenda: "It was in the Queen's speech..." etc. I suspect the reason that Speech from the throne is not the primary topic for King's Speech is the film. I actually disagree that King's speech (lower case) should be the title of the disambiguation page: the primary topic for that capitalisation ought to be Speech from the throne. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I agree with Shhhnotsoloud that the speech from the throne is the primary topic for this search term in both capitalisations. This implies nothing about the primary topic for different search terms such as King's Speech (about which I don't currently have an opinion, other than there is no reason it has to be the same as these). Thryduulf (talk) 10:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per Shhhnotsoloud - I agree that Speech from the throne is the primary topic, and it probably would be for King's speech as well if it wasn't for the 2010 film. Hut 8.5 11:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I agree with the above analysis that the WP:PTOPIC for "Queen's Speech" is indeed Speech from the Throne. With respect to "King's Speech", this is not so due to the 2010 blockbuster film being titled "The King's Speech" blocking anything from being the true primary topic. As the thrust of the nominator's argument relies upon an incorrect pure assumption that what is true of the male gendered term must imply that the same thing is true about the female gendered term, I see no persuasive reason to retarget the redirect. As such, keeping the redirect makes the most sense to me. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:54, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Channel Ten Australia[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Channel Ten Australia

Sydney's TVS[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 12:29, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion under WP:RFD#DELETE (1) and (2). – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 10:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you search Sydney’s TVS on YouTube you will find this video [1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aPZ62aotOI featuring Television Sydney. So I would keep this redirect as it is. Bassie f (talk) 22:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SBS Mobile24[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 11:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same as the other SBS Mobile24 discussion Bassie f (talk) 08:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I’ve notified about this discussion at the target article’s talk page. Bassie f (talk) 08:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rectangular controller[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Rectangular controller

Wing grip controller[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Wing grip controller

Saturn digital gamepad[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Saturn digital gamepad

Dog bone controller[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Nintendo Entertainment System#Controllers. Jay 💬 11:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "dog bone" is not mentioned in the target article, leaving it unclear what this redirect is meant to refer and leaving readers attempting to find information about the subject of the redirect with finding nothing. (However, it seems the redirect is a {{R with history}} that was an article for 6 months in 2005 prior to being WP:BLARed.) Steel1943 (talk) 06:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RETARGET to Nintendo Entertainment System models#Redesigned variant where it is mentioned. This “Dogbone Controller” is actually an officially upgraded NES controller in the style of the SNES Controller. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 12:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Or RETARGET to Nintendo Entertainment System#Controllers where it is also mentioned. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 12:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sonic speed[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Speed of sound. Jay 💬 11:07, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given that sonic speed is literally the speed at which sound travels, I propose that this be retargeted to speed of sound. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget as per nom. WPscatter t/c 06:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(Creator of redirect) Retarget per nom. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 12:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Left button & Right button[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 11:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The concepts are not exclusive to their target, nor are the concepts exclusive to Computer mouse. (If the redirects were named "Left/Right mouse button", then they would be exclusive to Computer mouse.) There are many things that have a "left button" or a "right button" ... not just devices, but even clothes. Steel1943 (talk) 06:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - seems far too ambiguous to be useful. A7V2 (talk) 09:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as ambiguous and likely to cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Video screen[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Video screen

Primate research[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Primatology. Jay 💬 10:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Primatology is on the study of primates, while the current redirect target is about a specific type of testing that is performed on primates. I think that this term better redirects to the more general article on the study of primates, so I propose that this be retargeted to primatology. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:43, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget per nom. A hatnote can be added to the current target if desired. Thryduulf (talk) 10:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom --Lenticel (talk) 03:48, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per the above. I think that a hatnote should definitely be added though as this seems a plausible search term for it even if not the most likely thing a would-be searcher is looking for. A7V2 (talk) 09:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per above, with hatnote to current target. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 20:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bush Dick Affair[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5. ✗plicit 01:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The term "Bush Dick affair" appears nowhere in the target article. This also seems like an implausible search term for the target article, so I propose that this be deleted as such. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE or possibly Speed Delete per WP:G3 as vandalism or WP:G5 if the users get banned as sockpuppets. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 19:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged both as WP:G3 Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 00:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Archived discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Heres The Dealio/Archive#05 October 2022 Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 00:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Golden liquid[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are many golden liquids and the term "golden liquid" is not mentioned at the target article. I'm honestly not sure that urine is the WP:PTOPIC for the topic "golden liquid'", so it might be better to dabify this or delete this outright if a dab is not going to be useful navigationally. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Lager was my first thought, but searches here and at google show there is nothing even remotely resembling a primary topic and a list of gold-coloured liquids would be indiscriminate. Thryduulf (talk) 10:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Moonu nombu[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Draft:Moonu nombu

Private Meeting[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Private Meeting

English-language given names[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget and delete.

The target is 1) in Project space and 2) contains less than a dozen names. I don't find this particularly useful. I don't see a better category. A list of given names is not very encyclopedic and can be found at other websites. Delete. MB 02:17, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added French also, where the target is an empty list. MB 03:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 05:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:WikiFox[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 11#Wikipedia:WikiFox

The fair share sequence[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 11#The fair share sequence

Unannounced Olympiads[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Unannounced Olympiads

List of tallest buildings in Burlington, Vermont[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#List of tallest buildings in Burlington, Vermont

SBS Mobile 24[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 11:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know why this redirect page exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bassie f (talk • contribs) 21:58, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And not mentioned in target article. Bassie f (talk) 23:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I've notified about this discussion at the target article's talkpage.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not mentioned in target article. Bassie f (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_October_5&oldid=1206982836"