Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 27[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 27, 2024.

100% coupon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 12:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The context refers to a meme where a person holding the cashier at gunpoint is superficially similar to someone use a coupon because you get your money back in most cases. That being said, I doubt some obscure meme would make a really good redirect. Okmrman (talk) 23:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Mach61 03:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete as unconstructive before max0r finds it cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of Netflix original films (2020–2029)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary WP:CRYSTAL, considering 2029 is several years in the future. Steel1943 (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Windows 12[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Windows 12 is a purported future version of Windows that hasn't really been officially announced by Microsoft yet. There is also a draft article at Draft:Windows 12, but that article is currently built off of rumors and speculation. This redirect can be recreated and/or an article can be written sometime after Microsoft officially announces Windows 12, but right now, WP:CRYSTAL. AKK700 17:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. WP:CRYSTAL applies to articles, not redirects. The redirect is helpful because there are undoubtedly people who type "Windows 12" into the search bar (as I just did, and happened upon this deletion request). And those readers need to be redirected somewhere. 71.77.77.187 (talk) 17:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. WP:CRYSTAL certainly applies to redirects if we do not have sufficient evidence and references to validate the subject existing in the future with certainty. Steel1943 (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Windows 12 has not been released or announced yet, nor has anything really been confirmed about it. The target page contains no information on Windows 12 (and should not until it is announced). This redirect is currently misleading, and a new article can be created once we have official news about it. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Even if the existence of Windows 12 is speculative, it's a cheap redirect that could lead misled readers, and could be easily replaced with a full article if/when the time comes TappyTurtle [talk | contribs] 16:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: WP:G4 (edit: and protect) JoshuaAuble (talk) (edits) 19:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The page should also be protected from creation as with Windows 11, which was create-protected prior to an official announcement from Microsoft. AKK700 03:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G4. — CactusWriter (talk) 23:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the arguments presented in 2015. NotAGenious (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - It strikes me that such a redirect even exists. Who even searches for that? If that should be kept, it could be argued that any company's slogan should redirect to its page, which is totally out of the scope of redirects in general... Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 19:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - It's notable for being a common byline for crediting Wikipedia throughout the web. It certainly doesn't warrant a speedy deletion.GobsPint (talk) 22:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Also, it falls under G4 so a speedy deletion is reasonably necessary. Okmrman (talk) 23:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

New Red Room[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 6#New Red Room

Harley Quinn (pornographic actor)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 6#Harley Quinn (pornographic actor)

Airport route[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 4#Airport route

WorldAntiSpy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 12:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WorldAntiSpy is an example of rogue security software however not discussed at target article and not notable. Golem08 (talk) 22:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

PSGuard[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 12:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Again another malware file, however not discussed at target article and seemingly unnotable. Golem08 (talk) 22:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fatthew Randy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 00:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear why this redirect is needed - there's a listing at urban dictionary but no sources referring to the dab page entries using this name. NotAGenious (talk) 15:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Independent MPs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Independent MPs in Canada used to be at this pagename until I moved it to clarify its scope and avoid potential confusion with other navboxes, e.g. Template:Independent MPs in the United Kingdom. Now that the Canadian navbox is transcluded directly through its new name, I suggest that the old name be deleted to avoid any future mix-ups, e.g. being added to a British MP's biography by mistake. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 20:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate make a template-space dab page (yes, those exist). It would show an error message when transcluded. -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 05:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree with the IP editor who says to disambiguate (although the resulting disambiguation page could potentially get very long, couldn't it?) Bwrs (talk) 04:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not really, the only other relevant template is the UK one linked above. In most other countries with members of parliament, laws forbid anyone running or sitting in parliament without affiliation with a registered party, or independents sit so rarely that a template is moot. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Good point! I didn't notice the word “independent”; probably all the independent members of US Congress and independent sitting state legislators in the United States put together would fit in a single infobox, as they are so rare. All the more reason to disambiguate. Bwrs (talk) 16:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Also, US legislators are not "members of parliament". Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 11:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as noted above there are only two Independent MPs templates, Canada and United Kingdom. The redirect already has zero transclusions, deleting it is cleaner than a template dab - they exist but they're clunky. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 11:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No need for a disambiguation - nobody will expect either country-specific template to be at this title. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Disambiguate or Delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: make sure there's no valid transclusions of this redirect and then delete. Editors can use the correct ones fine without a disambiguation page. Skynxnex (talk) 20:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kafka-trapping[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 6#Kafka-trapping

Nutrient Recovery and Reuse[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 6#Nutrient Recovery and Reuse

Nonstop Sampler[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of Nonstop Sampler at the target discography, does not seem to be a likely search term without any content pertinent to it. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 07:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Open Floor[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No information about "Open Floor" at the target, which is noted in the edit history as being an "entirely different school than 5Rhythms". Was blanked for a moment in 2021, but was restored as a redirect due to no content being added. In any case, this title is ambiguous with Open floor plan which is a redirect to the article of Open plan, who's content is directly pertinent to open floors. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Open Floor is a style of modern dance, as is 5Rhythms. The two are not the same so the redirect (from a dance point of view) should go to Modern dance, with a brief mention of the approach to be added there. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 07:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I can't find any mention in enwiki of this capitalisation. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

OperaMail.com[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 6#OperaMail.com

Hekt[edit]

Not mentioned at the target. External searches don't pull up anything related to this scale, although it appears to be an alternative name for Heqet, says Google. However, it does not appear at Heqet (our page on Wikipedia uses "Heket", but Google's definitely uses "Hekt"). In any case, "Hekt" is short enough to have a surplus of other mentions on Wikipedia as a word, appearing across the board in terms of viability as a redirect. Also sometimes short for "Hektor" and several others. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Per this source, Heinz Bohlen, one of the namesakes of the Bohlen–Pierce scale, described the hekt in this paper (cited in the original German as source 2 in the article) as an alternative measurement to a cent, such that 100 hekts divide each step in the Bohlen–Pierce scale. I found a couple of other sources using the hekt measurement searching Google scholar: [1] and [2]. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I would also be open to disambiguation to Hektor and Bohlen–Pierce scale, as well as Heqet if sources can be found establishing that Hekt is an alternative transliteration. It also appears that there is a HEKT cell line that might be related to HEK 293 cells. If it just ends up being Hektor and BP scale, then I would support keeping with a hatnote to Hektor. voorts (talk/contributions) 14:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom as ambiguous. Mention may be added to the target using voorts' sources however. Jay 💬 11:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 17:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 07:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 03:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qwik Crisp[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 07:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Na Sé Contaethe[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 4#Na Sé Contaethe

El Loco (Los de Abajo song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 12:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 07:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 03:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

El Loco (wrestler)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 07:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 03:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Various MAR characters (2)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussed at target ones or twice in passing but without enough substance to warrant a redirect. Most of these have prior article history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 07:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 03:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Various MAR characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target at all. Most of these have prior article history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 07:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 04:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nanashi (MÄR)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 4#Nanashi (MÄR)

List of minor characters in MÄR[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The target contains no such list. Both of these have prior article history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given that nobody has imported any information in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE, perhaps that can be done by somebody if they can provide an attribute to it while also suggesting it to the other MÄR articles as I had suggested in the AFD that was mentioned. Any objections? Rtkat3 (talk) 02:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 06:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Could change vote if it's updated. Okmrman (talk) 04:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Penny station[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely a flag stop is the primary topic for this generic term. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Not only is this the primary topic according to my research, it's the the only notable topic with this exact name - the only other thing that might be notable (but I'm not convinced it actually is) is called Copper Penny Station and there is no content about that on en.wp anyway. Additionally, this redirect is the result of a BLAR so it should be taken to AfD if you want it deleted, but as previous AfDs for Canadian flag stops resulted in a consensus to redirect we'd likely be back here anyway. Thryduulf (talk) 09:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ToadetteEdit! 06:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Thryduulf Okmrman (talk) 04:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

SuperCops Vs Super Villains[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 6#SuperCops Vs Super Villains

Rape of Nancheng[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 4#Rape of Nancheng

Jonny cochrane[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 4#Jonny cochrane

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_April_27&oldid=1223496798"