Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arisedrew/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Arisedrew[edit]

Arisedrew (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Report date January 23 2009, 23:01 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by NJGW (talk)
  • Arisedrew was indef blocked for impersonating an admin... Banana254 is performing actions which appear to impersonate an admin.[1]
  • Arisedrew has called me a "wanabe mod."[2] Banan254 has accused me of impersonating an admin.[3]
  • Their user pages are identical.[4][5]
  • They both have a problem with race issues.[6][7]
  • IP 76.181.47.198 performed the exact same edit as Banan254 on Race and crime.[[8][9]
  • As for Cmchir, this is might not be related, but Arisedrew comes out of nowhere (no connection I found, and Cmchir's account was only 4 days old) to impersonate an admin and "grant" Cmchir's unblock request.[10] Arisedrew might have just been wikistalking someone or involved with someone somehow, but this is all in the same period as Banan254's creation and is the reason for Arisedrew's block.


NJGW (talk) 23:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by NJGW (talk) 23:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
  1. Banana254 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. Wartortle28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. Ghost109 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  4. Mechafool (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  5. InsaneTears (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  6. ChessNooblol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  7. PROPS TO MY HOMIES ON THE EAST SIDE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  8. KeepAlert (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  9. Interior Crocodile Alligator (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

It was previously determined that Ghost109 = Mother Niggle (talk · contribs) = ProfessionalNub (talk · contribs) = NewYorrrkRangers (talk · contribs). An abuse report to the New York City Public Schools system administrators may be in order. This individual is editing from school computers to further his hellbent racist views and vandalize Wikipedia. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Blocked and tagged. Tiptoety talk 19:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Tiptoety talk 00:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Report date February 10 2009, 20:47 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Previously confirmed and recently active socks
Evidence submitted by NJGW (talk)


Arisedrew blocked for continued socking and disruption, and is confirmed to have operated a disruptive sock farm (see recent socks above). Barnstarr began editing with personal attacks against me (as well as creating a--now deleted--attack page against other editors) despite being a new editor.

  • Banana254's final edit was to call me a "vandal"[11]
  • Barnstarr also calls my edits vandalism.[12]
  • There is significant cross posting by Barnstarr, Banana254, and the 3 IPs listed above, on the talk pages of the 3 IPs listed above.

This CU is to see if there are other Arisedrew socks which the first round of CU may have missed.

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: B  + E (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and community ban/sanction evasion)
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by NJGW (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]


  •  Clerk endorsed To possibly check for more socks. Synergy 01:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Based on the previously identified sockpuppets, Barnstarr would be Red X Unrelated to Arisedrew. IP evidence suggests it could be Sleepydre, though. In any case, no other socks were found. Dominic·t 08:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. 
Synergy 20:46, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Report date March 17 2009, 22:03 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by CardinalDan (talk)

Sock of Arisedrew CardinalDan (talk) 22:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
  •  Clerk note: whilst the name is a bit of a giveaway, is there any behavioural evidence? Mayalld (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions

 Completed already blocked for vandalism Mayalld (talk) 22:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Mayalld (talk) 22:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

04 August 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Already blocked, creating case for CU comments. -- DQ (t) (e) 17:05, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  •  Confirmed that these two accounts match each other. The connection from this batch to the last one batch, however, will have to be behavioural/WP:DUCK, however. Courcelles 17:09, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

29 July 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Erinpails' second edit was to repeat this edit by User:Smerdiese, who was blocked by User:Drmies as a sock of 'User:Arisedrew returns' (aka 'User:Arisedrew' aka 'User:Arisedrew Rises Again').

The IP addresses at The deletion request for the image involved, started by another member of the sockfarm, 'User:BananaYesterday', may be related. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:02, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • So, the girlfriend who owns the dog (or the camera?) broke up with the sock--that's, eh, sad. Drmies (talk) 16:15, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Arisedrew/Archive&oldid=1079625855"